Search (11383 results, page 1 of 570)

  1. Kocamustafaogullari, K.: Computer aided management for information processing projects (1995) 0.21 
    0.20821413 = product of:
  0.3123212 = sum of:
    0.15777266 = weight(_text_:management in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15777266 = score(doc=4546,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.7882298 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
    0.15454853 = sum of:
      0.09018275 = weight(_text_:system in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09018275 = score(doc=4546,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.48217484 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
      0.06436578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06436578 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes a study of the nature of information processing projects and some of the project management programming packages used. Also describes an in house interface program developed to utilize a selected project management package, TIMELINE, by using ORACLE Data Base Management System tools and the Pascal programming language for the management of information system projects. Studies a sample application by using the developed system
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:40:59
    Source
    Microcomputers for information management. 12(1995) no.3, S.221-233
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  2. Beulens, A.; Zuurbier, P.: Inter-firm competence management (1996) 0.19 
    0.19277541 = product of:
  0.2891631 = sum of:
    0.1460691 = weight(_text_:management in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1460691 = score(doc=2805,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.729759 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
    0.143094 = sum of:
      0.052067034 = weight(_text_:system in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052067034 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
      0.09102697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09102697 = score(doc=2805,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a framework for analyzing management processes of inter-firm competence. Effective and efficient management of inter-firm competence is suggested to depend an a balance between knowledge systems and enabling information technologies. Knowledge processes comprise processes to collect, generate, diffuse, utilize and dispose knowledge. Managing these processes in an inter-firm environment poses some new challenges both to knowledge and information system development as well.
    Date
    12. 8.2002 13:22:13
    Series
    Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.18 
    0.17709258 = sum of:
  0.09431767 = product of:
    0.282953 = sum of:
      0.282953 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.282953 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5034589 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.063249774 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.063249774 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
        2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
          4.0 = termFreq=4.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.019525139 = product of:
    0.039050277 = sum of:
      0.039050277 = weight(_text_:system in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039050277 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Source
    System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference
  4. Lundquist, C.; Frieder, O.; Holmes, D.O.; Grossman, D.: ¬A parallel relational database management system approach to relevance feedback in information retrieval (1999) 0.18 
    0.1760653 = product of:
  0.26409793 = sum of:
    0.08944868 = weight(_text_:management in 4303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08944868 = score(doc=4303,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4303, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4303)
    0.17464924 = sum of:
      0.078100555 = weight(_text_:system in 4303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078100555 = score(doc=4303,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 4303, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4303)
      0.09654868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09654868 = score(doc=4303,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4303, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4303)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    17. 1.2000 12:22:18
  5. Holsapple, C.W.: Knowledge management in decision making and decision support (1995) 0.17 
    0.1665167 = product of:
  0.24977505 = sum of:
    0.13334224 = weight(_text_:management in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13334224 = score(doc=2437,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.6661758 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
    0.116432816 = sum of:
      0.052067034 = weight(_text_:system in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052067034 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
      0.06436578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06436578 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Introduces a knowledge management oriented view of decisions and decisioning as a complement to classical perspectives and as a contribution to understanding computer based possibilities for relaxing strains on decision makers. The perspective includes a model of knowledge management activities performed by a decision maker and a taxonomy of knowledge types. This leads to a characterization of decision support system purposes, traits and potentials that offer a basis for new research into computerized possibilities for knowledge management
    Source
    Knowledge and policy. 8(1995) no.1, S.5-22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.16 
    0.16469347 = product of:
  0.2470402 = sum of:
    0.07454057 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07454057 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
    0.17249963 = sum of:
      0.09204239 = weight(_text_:system in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09204239 = score(doc=3304,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.08045723 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08045723 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Guest editorial für ein Special issue on "The reward system of science".
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485
  7. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.16 
    0.16028245 = product of:
  0.24042366 = sum of:
    0.059632454 = weight(_text_:management in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059632454 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
    0.18079121 = sum of:
      0.11642543 = weight(_text_:system in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11642543 = score(doc=6582,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.62248504 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
      0.06436578 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06436578 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the form and function of Cutter numbers in the classification of books and describes the CUTT-x expert system for the automatic assignment of Cutter numbers with particular reference to the 3 basic elements in the system: knowledge base; inference engine; and user interface. The system was designed, tested and implemented in the Library of the International Civil Aviation Organization and was developed using the MS Access relational database management system in a Windows environment
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  8. Ballay, J.-F.; Poitou, J.-P.: Diademe : a collective knowledge management system (CKMS) (1996) 0.16 
    0.1561606 = product of:
  0.23424089 = sum of:
    0.11832949 = weight(_text_:management in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11832949 = score(doc=916,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
    0.1159114 = sum of:
      0.06763706 = weight(_text_:system in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06763706 = score(doc=916,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.04827434 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04827434 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The rationale and the general outline of a system for the management of collective knowledge (CKMS) has been presented by Poitou at ISMICK 95. The features of a CKMS are quite closely implemented in DIADEME, a computer assisted system for the capitalization and the management of research engineers' knowledge, which has been designed, developed and is currently being implemented at Electricité de France (EDF) by Ballay. During Spring 1995, Poitou has conducted at EDF a survey of the engineers' knowledge management behavior, of their attitudes toward a prospective CKMS. During Spring 1996, Poitou conducted a survey among the same engineers about their users' reactions to the implementation of DIADEME. The present paper briefly sums up the main features of a CKMS, (Section 1) describes the aims and the general architecture of DIADEME (Section 4), and gives some insight into the results of the 1995 users' expectation survey (Section 3) and of the 1996 users' satisfaction survey (Section 5).
    Series
    Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  9. Hangel, N.; Schmidt-Pfister, D.: Why do you publish? : on the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure (2017) 0.16 
    0.1552383 = sum of:
  0.045197517 = product of:
    0.13559255 = sum of:
      0.13559255 = weight(_text_:themes in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13559255 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.381782 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.037270285 = weight(_text_:management in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.037270285 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
        1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
          2.0 = termFreq=2.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
  0.072770506 = sum of:
    0.032541893 = weight(_text_:system in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032541893 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.040228616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040228616 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine researchers' motivations to publish by comparing different career stages (PhD students; temporarily employed postdocs/new professors; scholars with permanent employment) with regard to epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motives. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative analysis is mainly based on semi-structured narrative interviews with 91 researchers in the humanities, social, and natural sciences, based at six renowned (anonymous) universities in Germany, the UK, and the USA. These narratives contain answers to the direct question "why do you publish?" as well as remarks on motivations to publish in relation to other questions and themes. The interdisciplinary interpretation is based on both sociological science studies and philosophy of science in practice. Findings At each career stage, epistemic, pragmatic, and personal motivations to publish are weighed differently. Confirming earlier studies, the authors find that PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in temporary positions mainly feel pressured to publish for career-related reasons. However, across status groups, researchers also want to publish in order to support collective knowledge generation. Research limitations/implications The sample of interviewees may be biased toward those interested in reflecting on their day-to-day work. Social implications Continuous and collective reflection is imperative for preventing uncritical internalization of pragmatic reasons to publish. Creating occasions for reflection is a task not only of researchers themselves, but also of administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. Originality/value Most studies have illuminated how researchers publish while adapting to or growing into the contemporary publish-or-perish culture. This paper addresses the rarely asked question why researchers publish at all.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special issue on "The reward system of science".
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.529-544
  10. Fu, J.Z.: Making urban and regional documents available to the public : classifying and converting a specialized collection (1996) 0.15 
    0.15208821 = product of:
  0.22813231 = sum of:
    0.059632454 = weight(_text_:management in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059632454 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
    0.16849986 = sum of:
      0.10413407 = weight(_text_:system in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10413407 = score(doc=7232,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
      0.06436578 = weight(_text_:22 in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06436578 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the complex nature of urban, regional and local documents management, the decision making process of an in house classification system, and problems of converting a manual card cataloguing system to an computerized information retrieval system at Florida International University Library. The principles of this in house classification system can be used for any specialized collection
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  11. Knowledge management in practice : connections and context. (2008) 0.15 
    0.15013118 = sum of:
  0.062627524 = product of:
    0.18788257 = sum of:
      0.18788257 = weight(_text_:themes in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18788257 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.381782 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.49212003 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.059632454 = weight(_text_:management in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.059632454 = score(doc=2749,freq=8.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
        2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
          8.0 = termFreq=8.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
  0.027871203 = product of:
    0.055742405 = sum of:
      0.055742405 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055742405 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    658.4/038 22
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:43:51
    DDC
    658.4/038 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."
    LCSH
    Knowledge management
    Subject
    Knowledge management
  12. Tsuchiya, T.; Tsuchiya, S.: Interorganizational knowledge creation and policy exercise (1996) 0.15 
    0.15007102 = product of:
  0.22510652 = sum of:
    0.104356796 = weight(_text_:management in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104356796 = score(doc=913,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
    0.12074973 = sum of:
      0.06442966 = weight(_text_:system in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06442966 = score(doc=913,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.05632006 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05632006 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Interorganizational knowledge creation has become a crucial factor for successful management of corporations in the environment surrounding them today. Collaboration with other organizations is indispensable for a corporation to resolve complex and Jong range issues such as customer satisfaction and sustainable development. One of the most fundamental obstacles in creating knowledge among organizations is partial or incomplete communication due to incommensurable point of view. Policy exercises can improve commensurability and facilitate inter-organizational knowledge creation by providing a shared model of the system under investigation. This paper will discuss it taking Intelligent Transportation System (TTS) Deployment Exercises as an example.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  13. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.15 
    0.14781322 = sum of:
  0.031638265 = product of:
    0.094914794 = sum of:
      0.094914794 = weight(_text_:themes in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.094914794 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.381782 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.24860993 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0368957 = weight(_text_:management in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.0368957 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
        2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
          4.0 = termFreq=4.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
  0.07927925 = sum of:
    0.039454952 = weight(_text_:system in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039454952 = score(doc=1155,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.21095149 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.0398243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398243 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    Abstract
    Metadata and semantics are integral to any information system and significant to the sphere of Web data. Research focusing on metadata and semantics is crucial for advancing our understanding and knowledge of metadata; and, more profoundly for being able to effectively discover, use, archive, and repurpose information. In response to this need, researchers are actively examining methods for generating, reusing, and interchanging metadata. Integrated with these developments is research on the application of computational methods, linked data, and data analytics. A growing body of work also targets conceptual and theoretical designs providing foundational frameworks for metadata and semantic applications. There is no doubt that metadata weaves its way into nearly every aspect of our information ecosystem, and there is great motivation for advancing the current state of metadata and semantics. To this end, it is vital that scholars and practitioners convene and share their work.
    The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  14. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.15 
    0.14748585 = product of:
  0.22122876 = sum of:
    0.0737914 = weight(_text_:management in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0737914 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.14743736 = sum of:
      0.09111731 = weight(_text_:system in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09111731 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.05632006 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05632006 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.14 
    0.14162397 = sum of:
  0.054237023 = product of:
    0.16271107 = sum of:
      0.16271107 = weight(_text_:themes in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16271107 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.381782 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.063249774 = weight(_text_:management in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.063249774 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
        2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
          4.0 = termFreq=4.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
  0.02413717 = product of:
    0.04827434 = sum of:
      0.04827434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04827434 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.14 
    0.14075026 = product of:
  0.21112537 = sum of:
    0.09037565 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09037565 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.12074973 = sum of:
      0.06442966 = weight(_text_:system in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06442966 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.05632006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05632006 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System
  17. Lupovici, C.: ¬Le digital object identifier : le système du DOI (1998) 0.14 
    0.14049128 = product of:
  0.2107369 = sum of:
    0.052178398 = weight(_text_:management in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052178398 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
    0.1585585 = sum of:
      0.078909904 = weight(_text_:system in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078909904 = score(doc=2747,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
      0.0796486 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0796486 = score(doc=2747,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) has been developed by the academic technical and medical publishing sectors to enable the management of access rights to information published electronically. The DOI system has evolved from the physical documentary unit identifiers developed in the 1970, physical and document logical unit identifiers developed in the 1980s and recently modified to meet the needs of electronic distribution. This experience is integrated into the standardization, currently in progress on the Internet network, of the identification of resources and their localization. The DOI system is potentially the object of an international standard as the ISBN and the ISSN have been
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:29:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The digital Object Identifier: the DOI system
  18. Information at work : Information management in the workplace (2019) 0.14 
    0.13862346 = sum of:
  0.036158018 = product of:
    0.108474046 = sum of:
      0.108474046 = weight(_text_:themes in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.108474046 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.381782 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.08944868 = weight(_text_:management in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.08944868 = score(doc=5777,freq=18.0), product of:
      0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.05938408 = queryNorm
      0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
        4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
          18.0 = termFreq=18.0
        3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
        0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
  0.0130167585 = product of:
    0.026033517 = sum of:
      0.026033517 = weight(_text_:system in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026033517 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Today's society is characterized by quick technological developments and constant changes to our information environments. One of the biggest changes has been on our workplace environments where technological developments have automated work processes that were previously done by manual labour whilst new professions and work tasks have emerged in response to new methods of creating, sharing and using information. Information at Work: Information management in the workplace provides a comprehensive account of information in the modern workplace. It includes a set of chapters examining and reviewing the major concepts within workplace information, from over-arching themes of information cultures and ecologies, to strategic concerns of information management and governance, and to detailed accounts of questions and current debates. This book will be useful reading for researchers in Information Science and Information Management and students on related courses. It is also suitable to be used as an introductory text for those working in allied fields such as Management and Business Studies.
    Content
    Intro -- Title page -- Contents -- List of figures -- Acknowledgement -- Contributors -- Foreword: Situating the role of information in the messy and complex context of the workplace -- 1 Work and information in modern society: a changing workplace -- Economic changes and information innovation -- Information technology and its impact on people -- Fragmentation -- Information technology and its impact on organizations -- Global trends -- Work information environments -- Perspectives on workplace information -- Models of workplace information1 -- Taylor's information use environments -- This book -- References -- 2 Information activities and tasks -- Introduction -- Data, information and knowledge - the fuel that drives information work -- About work and examples of work -- The workplace -- Deconstructing work -- Conclusion -- Future directions -- References -- 3 Information culture -- Introduction -- Defining information culture -- Information culture - factors and components -- Information culture research -- Conclusions -- References -- 4 Information management -- Introduction -- Information management and the workplace -- Definition of information management -- Related concepts -- Conclusion: the future of information management and workplace information -- Note -- References -- 5 Information artefacts -- Introduction -- Theoretical underpinnings for information artefacts -- Key concepts: information source and information channel -- Use of information sources and channels -- Key concept: information tool -- Key concept: information system -- Information artefacts and information needs -- Conclusions: information artefacts, collegial inclusion and expertise in the workplace -- References -- 6 Information attributes -- Introduction -- Theoretical underpinnings -- Conclusion -- References.
  19. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.14 
    0.1379376 = product of:
  0.20690641 = sum of:
    0.16667779 = weight(_text_:management in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16667779 = score(doc=1000,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.040228616 = product of:
      0.08045723 = sum of:
        0.08045723 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045723 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05938408 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  20. Moore, R.W.: Management of very large distributed shared collections (2009) 0.14 
    0.13749035 = product of:
  0.20623551 = sum of:
    0.104356796 = weight(_text_:management in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104356796 = score(doc=3845,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20016073 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05938408 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
    0.10187872 = sum of:
      0.045558654 = weight(_text_:system in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045558654 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1870333 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
      0.05632006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05632006 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20795293 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05938408 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Large scientific collections may be managed as data grids for sharing data, digital libraries for publishing data, persistent archives for preserving data, or as real-time data repositories for sensor data. Despite the multiple types of data management objectives, it is possible to build each system from generic software infrastructure. This entry examines the requirements driving the management of large data collections, the concepts on which current data management systems are based, and the current research initiatives for managing distributed data collections.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:57

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 9505
  • m 1130
  • s 494
  • el 470
  • x 118
  • r 92
  • b 54
  • i 34
  • p 19
  • n 13
  • ? 10
  • d 8
  • h 3
  • pat 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications