Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Broadbent, E."
  1. Broadbent, E.: Classification access in the online catalog (1995) 0.02
    0.024785958 = product of:
      0.049571916 = sum of:
        0.049571916 = product of:
          0.09914383 = sum of:
            0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09914383 = score(doc=5571,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the development during the last few years of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, the potential for improving call number browsing in online catalogs has increased dramatically. For example, it is now possible to create various types of indexes to classification numbers in the online catalog. Two types of possible indexes, a chain index and an index using Library of Congress subject headings as an index to the Library of Congress classification are discussed and examples given in appendices. It is also noted that these two indexes are only two of various forms an online index to classification numbers could take.
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.119-142
  2. Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of the use of the subject catalog, Marriott Library, University of Utah (1984) 0.02
    0.020447372 = product of:
      0.040894743 = sum of:
        0.040894743 = product of:
          0.081789486 = sum of:
            0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081789486 = score(doc=315,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1984) no.3, S.75-83
  3. Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=457,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.105-124
  4. Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of humanities faculty library information seeking behavior (1986) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1986) no.3, S.23-37