-
Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002)
0.05
0.05011743 = product of:
0.10023486 = sum of:
0.10023486 = sum of:
0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05070265 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
0.04953221 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953221 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 7.2006 14:11:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.05
0.05011743 = product of:
0.10023486 = sum of:
0.10023486 = sum of:
0.05070265 = weight(_text_:b in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05070265 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.04953221 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953221 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011)
0.04
0.042957798 = product of:
0.085915595 = sum of:
0.085915595 = sum of:
0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043459415 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.04245618 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04245618 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 3.2011 19:22:55
-
Hjoerland, B.: Knowledge organization = Information organization? (2012)
0.04
0.039718196 = sum of:
0.017988488 = product of:
0.07195395 = sum of:
0.07195395 = weight(_text_:authors in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07195395 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043459415 = score(doc=639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Are the terms information organization (IO), organization of information (OI) and information architecture (IA) synonyms for knowledge organization (KO)? This study uses bibliometric methods, among others, to determine some relations between these terms and their meanings. Apparently the data shows that these terms should not be considered synonyms because each of the terms IO, OI, IA and KO produce a different set of high ranked authors, journals and papers. In many cases the terms are, however, used interchangeably (and thus indicating synonymity) and it is argued that the underlying theoretical principles are identical but that the different terms tend to be applied in different contexts: KO in the library context; IA in the web-context and IO and OI in more unspecified ways.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Indexing: concepts and theory (2018)
0.04
0.039718196 = sum of:
0.017988488 = product of:
0.07195395 = sum of:
0.07195395 = weight(_text_:authors in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07195395 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = weight(_text_:b in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043459415 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article discusses definitions of index and indexing and provides a systematic overview of kinds of indexes. Theories of indexing are reviewed, and the theoretical basis of both manual indexing and automatic indexing is discussed, and a classification of theories is suggested (rationalist, cognitivist, empiricist, and historicist and pragmatist theories). It is claimed that although many researchers do not consider indexing to be a theoretical issue (or consider it to be a field without theories) indexing is indeed highly theory-laden (and the idea of atheoretical indexing is an oxymoron). An important issue is also the subjectivity of the indexer, in particular, her socio-cultural and paradigmatic background, as for example, when authors of documents are the best indexers of their own documents. The article contains a section about the tools available for indexing in the form of the indexing languages and their nature. It is concluded that the social epistemology first proposed by Jesse Shera in 1951 provides the most fruitful theoretical framework for indexing.
-
Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013)
0.04
0.035798166 = product of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
0.03538015 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03538015 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:49:13
-
Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014)
0.04
0.035798166 = product of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
0.03538015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03538015 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022)
0.04
0.035798166 = product of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.07159633 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.03538015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03538015 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18.11.2023 13:47:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The foundation of the concept of relevance (2010)
0.03
0.033098496 = sum of:
0.014990407 = product of:
0.05996163 = sum of:
0.05996163 = weight(_text_:authors in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05996163 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01810809 = product of:
0.03621618 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 1975 Tefko Saracevic declared the subject knowledge view to be the most fundamental perspective of relevance. This paper examines the assumptions in different views of relevance, including the system's view and the user's view and offers a reinterpretation of these views. The paper finds that what was regarded as the most fundamental view by Saracevic in 1975 has not since been considered (with very few exceptions). Other views, which are based on less fruitful assumptions, have dominated the discourse on relevance in information retrieval and information science. Many authors have reexamined the concept of relevance in information science, but have neglected the subject knowledge view, hence basic theoretical assumptions seem not to have been properly addressed. It is as urgent now as it was in 1975 seriously to consider the subject knowledge view of relevance (which may also be termed the epistemological view). The concept of relevance, like other basic concepts, is influenced by overall approaches to information science, such as the cognitive view and the domain-analytic view. There is today a trend toward a social paradigm for information science. This paper offers an understanding of relevance from such a social point of view.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Citation analysis : a social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization (2013)
0.03
0.033098496 = sum of:
0.014990407 = product of:
0.05996163 = sum of:
0.05996163 = weight(_text_:authors in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05996163 = score(doc=2710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23809293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01810809 = product of:
0.03621618 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=2710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization (KO) and bibliometrics have traditionally been seen as separate subfields of library and information science, but bibliometric techniques make it possible to identify candidate terms for thesauri and to organize knowledge by relating scientific papers and authors to each other and thereby indicating kinds of relatedness and semantic distance. It is therefore important to view bibliometric techniques as a family of approaches to KO in order to illustrate their relative strengths and weaknesses. The subfield of bibliometrics concerned with citation analysis forms a distinct approach to KO which is characterized by its social, historical and dynamic nature, its close dependence on scholarly literature and its explicit kind of literary warrant. The two main methods, co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling represent different things and thus neither can be considered superior for all purposes. The main difference between traditional knowledge organization systems (KOSs) and maps based on citation analysis is that the first group represents intellectual KOSs, whereas the second represents social KOSs. For this reason bibliometric maps cannot be expected ever to be fully equivalent to scholarly taxonomies, but they are - along with other forms of KOSs - valuable tools for assisting users' to orient themselves to the information ecology. Like other KOSs, citation-based maps cannot be neutral but will always be based on researchers' decisions, which tend to favor certain interests and views at the expense of others.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009)
0.03
0.026953127 = product of:
0.053906254 = sum of:
0.053906254 = sum of:
0.03621618 = weight(_text_:b in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03621618 = score(doc=2748,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.017690076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017690076 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288986 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- References Bates, M.J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10(4), paper 239. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. Bates, M.J. (2006). Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1033-1045. Bates, M.J. (2008). Hjorland's critique of Bates' work on defining information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 842-844. Hjoerland, B. (2000). Documents, memory institutions, and information science. Journal of Documentation, 56, 27-41. Hjoerland, B. (2007). Information: Objective or subjective-situational? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1448-1456. Karpatschof, B. (2000). Human activity. Contributions to the anthropological sciences from a perspective of activity theory. Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/ 12-3/Karpatschof/Karp00.html.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:13:27
-
Nicolaisen, J.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬A rejoinder to Beghtol (2004) (2004)
0.03
0.025608707 = product of:
0.051217414 = sum of:
0.051217414 = product of:
0.10243483 = sum of:
0.10243483 = weight(_text_:b in 3006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10243483 = score(doc=3006,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.5535878 = fieldWeight in 3006, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen. In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63 sowie: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Understandings of language and cognition : implications for classification research (1994)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 8884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=8884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 8884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001)
0.03
0.025351325 = product of:
0.05070265 = sum of:
0.05070265 = product of:
0.1014053 = sum of:
0.1014053 = weight(_text_:b in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1014053 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theory of information science : Reply to Professor Gernot Wersig (1998)
0.02
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = product of:
0.08691883 = sum of:
0.08691883 = weight(_text_:b in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691883 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theory of knowledge organization and the feasibility of universal solutions (2004)
0.02
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = product of:
0.08691883 = sum of:
0.08691883 = weight(_text_:b in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691883 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The nature of information science and its core concepts (2014)
0.02
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = product of:
0.08691883 = sum of:
0.08691883 = weight(_text_:b in 1318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691883 = score(doc=1318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 1318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Does informetrics need a theory? : a rejoinder to professor anthony van raan (2017)
0.02
0.021729708 = product of:
0.043459415 = sum of:
0.043459415 = product of:
0.08691883 = sum of:
0.08691883 = weight(_text_:b in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691883 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010)
0.02
0.020486966 = product of:
0.04097393 = sum of:
0.04097393 = product of:
0.08194786 = sum of:
0.08194786 = weight(_text_:b in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08194786 = score(doc=3323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18503809 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.052226946 = queryNorm
0.44287026 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bezug zu: Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1519-1536.
