-
Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008)
0.02
0.020114698 = product of:
0.040229395 = sum of:
0.040229395 = product of:
0.060344093 = sum of:
0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018688826 = score(doc=1867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
0.041655265 = weight(_text_:h in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041655265 = score(doc=1867,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.3682743 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A brief communication appearing in this journal ranked UK-based LIS and (some) IR academics by their h-index using data derived from the Thomson ISI Web of Science(TM) (WoS). In this brief communication, the same academics were re-ranked, using other popular citation databases. It was found that for academics who publish more in computer science forums, their h was significantly different due to highly cited papers missed by WoS; consequently, their rank changed substantially. The study was widened to a broader set of UK-based LIS and IR academics in which results showed similar statistically significant differences. A variant of h, hmx, was introduced that allowed a ranking of the academics using all citation databases together.
- Object
- h-index
-
Petrelli, D.; Beaulieu, M.; Sanderson, M.; Demetriou, G.; Herring, P.; Hansen, P.: Observing users, designing clarity : a case study an the user-centered design of a cross-language information retrieval system (2004)
0.00
0.0044049984 = product of:
0.008809997 = sum of:
0.008809997 = product of:
0.02642999 = sum of:
0.02642999 = weight(_text_:m in 2506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02642999 = score(doc=2506,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2506, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2506)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Petrelli, D.; Levin, S.; Beaulieu, M.; Sanderson, M.: Which user interaction for cross-language information retrieval? : design issues and reflections (2006)
0.00
0.0044049984 = product of:
0.008809997 = sum of:
0.008809997 = product of:
0.02642999 = sum of:
0.02642999 = weight(_text_:m in 5053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02642999 = score(doc=5053,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 5053, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5053)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tann, C.; Sanderson, M.: Are Web-based informational queries changing? (2009)
0.00
0.0036339383 = product of:
0.0072678765 = sum of:
0.0072678765 = product of:
0.021803629 = sum of:
0.021803629 = weight(_text_:m in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021803629 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sanderson, M.; Lawrie, D.: Building, testing, and applying concept hierarchies (2000)
0.00
0.0031148044 = product of:
0.006229609 = sum of:
0.006229609 = product of:
0.018688826 = sum of:
0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018688826 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Clough, P.; Sanderson, M.: User experiments with the Eurovision Cross-Language Image Retrieval System (2006)
0.00
0.0031148044 = product of:
0.006229609 = sum of:
0.006229609 = product of:
0.018688826 = sum of:
0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 5052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018688826 = score(doc=5052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5052)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)