Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.03
    0.031908616 = product of:
      0.06381723 = sum of:
        0.023722902 = weight(_text_:management in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023722902 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
        0.04009433 = sum of:
          0.014488421 = weight(_text_:science in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014488421 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.025605911 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025605911 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Information Science in the German-speaking Countries.
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.3, S.415-439
  2. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.03
    0.025058959 = product of:
      0.100235835 = sum of:
        0.100235835 = sum of:
          0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036221053 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06401478 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science ; 9398
  3. Flores, F.N.; Moreira, V.P.: Assessing the impact of stemming accuracy on information retrieval : a multilingual perspective (2016) 0.02
    0.023225334 = product of:
      0.046450667 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 3187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=3187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3187)
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 3187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=3187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457316300358.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.5, S.840-854
  4. Keller, A.: Attitudes among German- and English-speaking librarians toward (automatic) subject indexing (2015) 0.01
    0.01037877 = product of:
      0.04151508 = sum of:
        0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151508 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The survey described in this article investigates the attitudes of librarians in German- and English-speaking countries toward subject indexing in general, and automatic subject indexing in particular. The results show great similarity between attitudes in both language areas. Respondents agree that the current quality standards should be upheld and dismiss critical voices claiming that subject indexing has lost relevance. With regard to automatic subject indexing, respondents demonstrate considerable skepticism-both with regard to the likely timeframe and the expected quality of such systems. The author considers how this low acceptance poses a difficulty for those involved in change management.
  5. Fauzi, F.; Belkhatir, M.: Multifaceted conceptual image indexing on the world wide web (2013) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.2, S.420-440
  6. Li, X.; Zhang, A.; Li, C.; Ouyang, J.; Cai, Y.: Exploring coherent topics by topic modeling with term weighting (2018) 0.01
    0.007413407 = product of:
      0.029653627 = sum of:
        0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029653627 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.6, S.1345-1358
  7. Siebenkäs, A.; Markscheffel, B.: Conception of a workflow for the semi-automatic construction of a thesaurus for the German printing industry (2015) 0.00
    0.004482127 = product of:
      0.017928507 = sum of:
        0.017928507 = product of:
          0.035857014 = sum of:
            0.035857014 = weight(_text_:science in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035857014 = score(doc=2091,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  8. Williams, R.V.: Hans Peter Luhn and Herbert M. Ohlman : their roles in the origins of keyword-in-context/permutation automatic indexing (2010) 0.00
    0.0036221053 = product of:
      0.014488421 = sum of:
        0.014488421 = product of:
          0.028976843 = sum of:
            0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028976843 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.835-849
  9. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.00
    0.0032015191 = product of:
      0.012806077 = sum of:
        0.012806077 = product of:
          0.025612153 = sum of:
            0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025612153 = score(doc=3311,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.3-16
  10. Smiraglia, R.P.; Cai, X.: Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0032015191 = product of:
      0.012806077 = sum of:
        0.012806077 = product of:
          0.025612153 = sum of:
            0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025612153 = score(doc=3627,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A very important extension of the traditional domain of knowledge organization (KO) arises from attempts to incorporate techniques devised in the computer science domain for automatic concept extraction and for grouping, categorizing, clustering and otherwise organizing knowledge using mechanical means. Four specific terms have emerged to identify the most prevalent techniques: machine learning, clustering, automatic indexing, and automatic classification. Our study presents three domain analytical case analyses in search of answers. The first case relies on citations located using the ISKO-supported "Knowledge Organization Bibliography." The second case relies on works in both Web of Science and SCOPUS. Case three applies co-word analysis and citation analysis to the contents of the papers in the present special issue. We observe scholars involved in "clustering" and "automatic classification" who share common thematic emphases. But we have found no coherence, no common activity and no social semantics. We have not found a research front, or a common teleology within the KO domain. We also have found a lively group of authors who have succeeded in submitting papers to this special issue, and their work quite interestingly aligns with the case studies we report. There is an emphasis on KO for information retrieval; there is much work on clustering (which involves conceptual points within texts) and automatic classification (which involves semantic groupings at the meta-document level).
  11. Lu, K.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Toward effective automated weighted subject indexing : a comparison of different approaches in different environments (2018) 0.00
    0.0032015191 = product of:
      0.012806077 = sum of:
        0.012806077 = product of:
          0.025612153 = sum of:
            0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025612153 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject indexing plays an important role in supporting subject access to information resources. Current subject indexing systems do not make adequate distinctions on the importance of assigned subject descriptors. Assigning numeric weights to subject descriptors to distinguish their importance to the documents can strengthen the role of subject metadata. Automated methods are more cost-effective. This study compares different automated weighting methods in different environments. Two evaluation methods were used to assess the performance. Experiments on three datasets in the biomedical domain suggest the performance of different weighting methods depends on whether it is an abstract or full text environment. Mutual information with bag-of-words representation shows the best average performance in the full text environment, while cosine with bag-of-words representation is the best in an abstract environment. The cosine measure has relatively consistent and robust performance. A direct weighting method, IDF (Inverse Document Frequency), can produce quick and reasonable estimates of the weights. Bag-of-words representation generally outperforms the concept-based representation. Further improvement in performance can be obtained by using the learning-to-rank method to integrate different weighting methods. This study follows up Lu and Mao (Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1776-1784, 2015), in which an automated weighted subject indexing method was proposed and validated. The findings from this study contribute to more effective weighted subject indexing.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.121-133
  12. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.00
    0.003200739 = product of:
      0.012802956 = sum of:
        0.012802956 = product of:
          0.025605911 = sum of:
            0.025605911 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025605911 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.00
    0.003200739 = product of:
      0.012802956 = sum of:
        0.012802956 = product of:
          0.025605911 = sum of:
            0.025605911 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025605911 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Lichtenstein, A.; Plank, M.; Neumann, J.: TIB's portal for audiovisual media : combining manual and automatic indexing (2014) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB) developed a Web-based platform for audiovisual media. The audiovisual portal optimizes access to scientific videos such as computer animations and lecture and conference recordings. TIB's AV-Portal combines traditional cataloging and automatic indexing of audiovisual media. The article describes metadata standards for audiovisual media and introduces the TIB's metadata schema in comparison to other metadata standards for non-textual materials. Additionally, we give an overview of multimedia retrieval technologies used for the Portal and present the AV-Portal in detail as well as the additional value for libraries and their users.
  15. Daudaravicius, V.: ¬A framework for keyphrase extraction from scientific journals (2016) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present a framework for keyphrase extraction from scientific journals in diverse research fields. While journal articles are often provided with manually assigned keywords, it is not clear how to automatically extract keywords and measure their significance for a set of journal articles. We compare extracted keyphrases from journals in the fields of astrophysics, mathematics, physics, and computer science. We show that the presented statistics-based framework is able to demonstrate differences among journals, and that the extracted keyphrases can be used to represent journal or conference research topics, dynamics, and specificity.
  16. Simões, M. da Graça; Machado, L.M.; Souza, R.R.; Almeida, M.B.; Tavares Lopes, A.: Automatic indexing and ontologies : the consistency of research chronology and authoring in the context of Information Science (2018) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Cui, H.; Boufford, D.; Selden, P.: Semantic annotation of biosystematics literature without training examples (2010) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 3422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=3422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.522-542
  18. Benson, A.C.: Image descriptions and their relational expressions : a review of the literature and the issues (2015) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=1867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to survey the treatment of relationships, relationship expressions and the ways in which they manifest themselves in image descriptions. Design/methodology/approach - The term "relationship" is construed in the broadest possible way to include spatial relationships ("to the right of"), temporal ("in 1936," "at noon"), meronymic ("part of"), and attributive ("has color," "has dimension"). The intentions of these vaguely delimited categories with image information, image creation, and description in libraries and archives is complex and in need of explanation. Findings - The review brings into question many generally held beliefs about the relationship problem such as the belief that the semantics of relationships are somehow embedded in the relationship term itself and that image search and retrieval solutions can be found through refinement of word-matching systems. Originality/value - This review has no hope of systematically examining all evidence in all disciplines pertaining to this topic. It instead focusses on a general description of a theoretical treatment in Library and Information Science.
  19. Banerjee, K.; Johnson, M.: Improving access to archival collections with automated entity extraction (2015) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 2144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=2144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The complexity and diversity of archival resources make constructing rich metadata records time consuming and expensive, which in turn limits access to these valuable materials. However, significant automation of the metadata creation process would dramatically reduce the cost of providing access points, improve access to individual resources, and establish connections between resources that would otherwise remain unknown. Using a case study at Oregon Health & Science University as a lens to examine the conceptual and technical challenges associated with automated extraction of access points, we discuss using publically accessible API's to extract entities (i.e. people, places, concepts, etc.) from digital and digitized objects. We describe why Linked Open Data is not well suited for a use case such as ours. We conclude with recommendations about how this method can be used in archives as well as for other library applications.
  20. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Prebor, G.; Bloch, O.: Improving proverb search and retrieval with a generic multidimensional ontology (2017) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=3320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.141-153

Types