Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Cui, H.; Boufford, D.; Selden, P.: Semantic annotation of biosystematics literature without training examples (2010) 0.03
    0.03137991 = product of:
      0.20919938 = sum of:
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=3422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 3422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3422)
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=3422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 3422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3422)
        0.06973313 = weight(_text_:biologie in 3422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06973313 = score(doc=3422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960093 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.43692183 = fieldWeight in 3422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.590942 = idf(docFreq=164, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3422)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Field
    Biologie
  2. Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018) 0.03
    0.027758468 = product of:
      0.11103387 = sum of:
        0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022534605 = score(doc=4310,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
        0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022534605 = score(doc=4310,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
        0.020895448 = weight(_text_:der in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020895448 = score(doc=4310,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
        0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022534605 = score(doc=4310,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
        0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022534605 = score(doc=4310,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Seit Herbst 2017 findet in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek die Inhaltserschließung bestimmter Medienwerke rein maschinell statt. Die Qualität dieses Verfahrens, das die Prozessorganisation von Bibliotheken maßgeblich prägen kann, wird unter Fachleuten kontrovers diskutiert. Ihre Standpunkte werden zunächst hinreichend erläutert, ehe die Notwendigkeit einer Qualitätsprüfung des Verfahrens und dessen Grundlagen dargelegt werden. Zentraler Bestandteil einer künftigen Prüfung ist eine Testkollektion. Ihre Erstellung und deren Dokumentation steht im Fokus dieser Arbeit. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch die Entstehungsgeschichte und Anforderungen an gelungene Testkollektionen behandelt. Abschließend wird ein Retrievaltest durchgeführt, der die Einsatzfähigkeit der erarbeiteten Testkollektion belegt. Seine Ergebnisse dienen ausschließlich der Funktionsüberprüfung. Eine Qualitätsbeurteilung maschineller Inhaltserschließung im Speziellen sowie im Allgemeinen findet nicht statt und ist nicht Ziel der Ausarbeitung.
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit, Bibliothekswissenschaften, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Köln
    Imprint
    Köln : Technische Hochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
  3. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.02
    0.020845547 = product of:
      0.08338219 = sum of:
        0.01662403 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01662403 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.01662403 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01662403 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.01688607 = weight(_text_:der in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01688607 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3121784 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.01662403 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01662403 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.01662403 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01662403 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
    Footnote
    Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Siebenkäs, A.; Markscheffel, B.: Conception of a workflow for the semi-automatic construction of a thesaurus for the German printing industry (2015) 0.01
    0.0073597715 = product of:
      0.036798857 = sum of:
        0.009199714 = weight(_text_:und in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009199714 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.009199714 = weight(_text_:und in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009199714 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.009199714 = weight(_text_:und in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009199714 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.009199714 = weight(_text_:und in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009199714 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Karpathy, A.; Fei-Fei, L.: Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions (2015) 0.01
    0.0063083754 = product of:
      0.031541876 = sum of:
        0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007885469 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007885469 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007885469 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.007885469 = weight(_text_:und in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007885469 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/cvpr2015.pdf und http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/deepimagesent/. Vgl. auch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8621658.
  6. Williams, R.V.: Hans Peter Luhn and Herbert M. Ohlman : their roles in the origins of keyword-in-context/permutation automatic indexing (2010) 0.01
    0.0059028077 = product of:
      0.059028074 = sum of:
        0.048348386 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048348386 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11508996 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42009214 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
        0.010679688 = weight(_text_:der in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010679688 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  7. Willis, C.; Losee, R.M.: ¬A random walk on an ontology : using thesaurus structure for automatic subject indexing (2013) 0.00
    0.0042055836 = product of:
      0.021027917 = sum of:
        0.0052569793 = weight(_text_:und in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052569793 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
        0.0052569793 = weight(_text_:und in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052569793 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
        0.0052569793 = weight(_text_:und in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052569793 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
        0.0052569793 = weight(_text_:und in 1016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052569793 = score(doc=1016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1016)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.00
    8.20206E-4 = product of:
      0.01640412 = sum of:
        0.01640412 = product of:
          0.03280824 = sum of:
            0.03280824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03280824 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  9. Junger, U.: Can indexing be automated? : the example of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (2014) 0.00
    4.672364E-4 = product of:
      0.009344728 = sum of:
        0.009344728 = weight(_text_:der in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009344728 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  10. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.00
    3.2808242E-4 = product of:
      0.006561648 = sum of:
        0.006561648 = product of:
          0.013123296 = sum of:
            0.013123296 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013123296 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.00
    3.2808242E-4 = product of:
      0.006561648 = sum of:
        0.006561648 = product of:
          0.013123296 = sum of:
            0.013123296 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013123296 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.00
    3.2808242E-4 = product of:
      0.006561648 = sum of:
        0.006561648 = product of:
          0.013123296 = sum of:
            0.013123296 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013123296 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22