-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.04
0.037640385 = product of:
0.11292115 = sum of:
0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051281624 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330111 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.028628424 = product of:
0.057256848 = sum of:
0.057256848 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057256848 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996)
0.03
0.029824575 = product of:
0.13421059 = sum of:
0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06345777 = score(doc=5578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.07075281 = weight(_text_:data in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07075281 = score(doc=5578,freq=12.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.59902847 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
-
Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996)
0.03
0.02521946 = product of:
0.113487564 = sum of:
0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06345777 = score(doc=5574,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.050029792 = weight(_text_:data in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050029792 = score(doc=5574,freq=6.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-90
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Linking of alternate graphic representation in USMARC authority records (1993)
0.02
0.024101896 = product of:
0.108458534 = sum of:
0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051281624 = score(doc=8341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
0.057176907 = weight(_text_:data in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057176907 = score(doc=8341,freq=6.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses the facilities in USMARC for linking fields containing non Roman scripts to their Romanized counterparts. In USMARC authority records, the 880 field: Alternate graphic representation (which contains the authentic non Roman text); is linked to the field that contains the same information in romanized form. The 880 field was added to the USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data in 1984 and to the USMARC Format for Authority Data in 1991. The new data elements in the Authority Format are modeled on those of the Bibliographic Format
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 18(1993) no.1, S.27-62
-
Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990)
0.02
0.02345206 = product of:
0.10553427 = sum of:
0.07252317 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07252317 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330111 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A practical manual describing standard procedures in cataloguing using AACR2 1988 revision and LoC cataloguing data
- LCSH
- Cataloging
- Subject
- Cataloging
-
McCallum, S.: What makes a standard? (1996)
0.02
0.02345206 = product of:
0.10553427 = sum of:
0.07252317 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07252317 = score(doc=5104,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330111 = score(doc=5104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Describes the characteristics of de jure standards developed by the formal standards organizations (ISO, ANSI, and NISO) and formal industry groups, and de facto standards developed by informal, self selected groups and companies. Compares this process with that used to develop Internet standards. Examines 3 key standards for the library community on this basis: standards that form the basis for encoding bibliographic data (MARC); standards for electronic documents (SGML-based), and standards for ordering and purchasing bibliographic items (EDIFACT-based)
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.5-15
-
Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996)
0.02
0.022595724 = product of:
0.101680756 = sum of:
0.07692243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07692243 = score(doc=57,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.024758326 = weight(_text_:data in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024758326 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.21, nos.3/4
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Linkage in USMARC bibliographic records (1993)
0.02
0.020520551 = product of:
0.09234248 = sum of:
0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06345777 = score(doc=544,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028884713 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- USMARC records that contain non Roman scripts exhibit 2 types of linkage between the Latin script fields and their alternate graphic representation (the non Roman text): linkage based on systematic romanization, and linkage between names for the same person, place or thing. The lack of rules for linkage inhibits copy cataloging and causes inconsistency on record displays. To determine an unequivocal basis for linkage, 4 types of field association in bibliographic records are examined: hierarchy of components; functional equivalence; semantic equivalence; and systematic romanization. Concludes that semantic equivalence is the ideal basis for linkage and can be accomodated by the current structure of the USMARC format for bibliographic data
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.1, S.5-38
-
Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999)
0.02
0.018731717 = product of:
0.084292725 = sum of:
0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051281624 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330111 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the two concepts of Content and Coding which together define Metadata. The encoding scheme used to hold the data content is referred to as a shell. One such shell is the MARC format. In this paper I describe the MARC format and its application to Internet resources, primarily through the OCLC-sponsored Intercat Project
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.55-68
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.02
0.018037936 = product of:
0.08117071 = sum of:
0.06345777 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06345777 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.017712934 = product of:
0.035425868 = sum of:
0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035425868 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.02
0.016521791 = product of:
0.074348055 = sum of:
0.054104704 = weight(_text_:processing in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054104704 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15121111 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.020243352 = product of:
0.040486705 = sum of:
0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040486705 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Heaney, M.: Object-oriented cataloging (1995)
0.02
0.016390251 = product of:
0.07375613 = sum of:
0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04487142 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028884713 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Catalogues have evolved from lists of physical items present in particular libraries into computerized access and retrieval tools for works dispersed across local and national boundaries. Works themselves are no longer constrained by physical form yet cataloguing rules have not evolved in parallel with these developments. Reanalyzes the nature of works and their publication in an approach based on object oriented modelling and demonstrates the advantages to be gained thereby. Suggests a strategic plan to enable an organic transformation to be made from current MARC based cataloguing to object oriented cataloguing. Proposes major revisions of MARC in order to allow records to maximize the benefits of both computerized databases and high speed data networks. This will involve a fundamental shift away from the AACR philosophy of description of, plus access to, physical items
-
Riemer, J.J.: Adding 856 Fields to authority records : rationale and implications (1998)
0.02
0.016390251 = product of:
0.07375613 = sum of:
0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04487142 = score(doc=3715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
0.028884713 = weight(_text_:data in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028884713 = score(doc=3715,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses ways of applying MARC Field 856 (Electronic Location and Access) to authority records in online union catalogues. In principle, each catalogue site location can be treated as the electronic record of the work concerned and the MARC Field 856 can then refer to this location as if it were referring to the location of a primary record. Although URLs may become outdated, the fact that they are located in specifically defined MARC Fields makes the data contained amenable to the same link maintenance software ae used for the electronic records themselves. Includes practical examples of typical union catalogue records incorporating MARC Field 856
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.5-9
-
Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990)
0.02
0.01589444 = product of:
0.07152498 = sum of:
0.051281624 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051281624 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.020243352 = product of:
0.040486705 = sum of:
0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040486705 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 14:22:51
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) nos.3/4, S.117-143
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.02
0.015538065 = product of:
0.06992129 = sum of:
0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04487142 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.025049873 = product of:
0.050099745 = sum of:
0.050099745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050099745 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Parker, V.: MARC tags for cataloging cartographic materials (1999)
0.01
0.014244896 = product of:
0.12820406 = sum of:
0.12820406 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12820406 = score(doc=5317,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.87087274 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- This is a table of those MARC fields most frequently used when cataloging cartographic materials. The table gives fields both for monographs and for serials.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 27(1999) nos.1/2, S.5-9
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.01
0.013907635 = product of:
0.062584355 = sum of:
0.04487142 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04487142 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14721331 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.017712934 = product of:
0.035425868 = sum of:
0.035425868 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035425868 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
International Seminar on the Creation and Use of Authority Files, St. Petersburg, Russia, 4-6 October 1995 (1996)
0.01
0.01304635 = product of:
0.11741715 = sum of:
0.11741715 = weight(_text_:germany in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11741715 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22275731 = queryWeight, product of:
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.52710795 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Content
- Papers of the following speakers: DANSKIN, A.: The Anglo-American Authority File: an idea whose time has come?; GUY, M.: The Bibliothèque Nationale de France and authority files: advances and perspectives in co-operation; KELM, B.: The Subject Authority File in Germany; McGARRY, D.: Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries; MURTOMAA, E.: Planning and creating name authority control: the Finnish experience
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.01
0.011834323 = product of:
0.053254455 = sum of:
0.0330111 = weight(_text_:data in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330111 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.020243352 = product of:
0.040486705 = sum of:
0.040486705 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040486705 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13080442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Delfino, E.: Data file formats for exchange of data (1993)
0.01
0.010252093 = product of:
0.09226884 = sum of:
0.09226884 = weight(_text_:data in 6690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09226884 = score(doc=6690,freq=10.0), product of:
0.118112594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.037353165 = queryNorm
0.7811939 = fieldWeight in 6690, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6690)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Discusses examples of ASCII data formats available in database programs which can be used for data exchange. Describes comma-delimited format, fixed length format, and one field per line format. Details a WordPerfect wordprocessing macro for converting data in comma-delimited files of a database system into a secondary mail merge file format of a wordprocessing package
