Search (514 results, page 2 of 26)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.011556499 = product of:
      0.034669496 = sum of:
        0.013968632 = weight(_text_:in in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013968632 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
        0.020700864 = product of:
          0.04140173 = sum of:
            0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04140173 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  2. Internet Privacy : eine multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme / a multidisciplinary analysis: acatech STUDIE (2012) 0.01
    0.011538027 = product of:
      0.03461408 = sum of:
        0.0061828885 = weight(_text_:in in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061828885 = score(doc=3383,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1041228 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
        0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02843119 = score(doc=3383,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Aufgrund der so großen Bedeutung von Privatheit im Internet hat acatech, die Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften, 2011 ein Projekt initiiert, das sich mit dem Privatheitsparadoxon wissenschaftlich auseinandersetzt. In dem Projekt werden Empfehlungen entwickelt, wie sich eine Kultur der Privatheit und des Vertrauens im Internet etablieren lässt, die es ermöglicht, das Paradoxon aufzulösen. Wir verwenden hier den Begriff der Privatheit. Er deutet an, dass hier nicht nur der räumliche Begriff Privatsphäre gemeint ist, sondern auch das im europäischen Kontext wichtige Konzept der informationellen Selbstbestimmung einbezogen ist. Dieser Band legt die Ergebnisse der ersten Projektphase vor: eine Bestandsaufnahme von Privatheit im Internet aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln. Kapitel 1 stellt die Wünsche und Befürchtungen von Internetnutzern und Gesellschaft im Hinblick auf ihre Privatheit vor. Sie wurden mithilfe sozialwissenschaftlicher Methoden untersucht. Ergänzend dazu untersucht das zweite Kapitel Privatheit im Cyberspace aus ethischer Perspektive. Das dritte Kapitel widmet sich ökonomischen Aspekten: Da viele Onlinedienstleistungen mit Nutzerdaten bezahlt werden, ergibt sich die Frage, was dies sowohl für den Nutzer und Kunden als auch für die Unternehmen bedeutet. Kapitel 4 hat einen technologischen Fokus und analysiert, wie Privatheit von Internettechnologien bedroht wird und welche technischen Möglichkeiten es gibt, um die Privatheit des Nutzers zu schützen. Selbstverständlich ist der Schutz von Privatheit im Internet nicht nur ein technisches Problem. Deshalb untersucht Kapitel 5 Privatheit aus rechtlicher Sicht. Bei der Lektüre der fünf Kapitel wird dem Leser sofort die Komplexität der Frage von Privatheit im Internet (Internet Privacy) bewusst. Daraus folgt die unbedingte Notwendigkeit eines interdisziplinären Ansatzes. In diesem Sinne wird die interdisziplinäre Projektgruppe gemeinsam Optionen und Empfehlungen für einen Umgang mit Privatheit im Internet entwickeln, die eine Kultur der Privatheit und des Vertrauens im Internet fördern. Diese Optionen und Empfehlungen werden 2013 als zweiter Band dieser Studie veröffentlicht.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Publikationen/Projektberichte/acatech_STUDIE_Internet_Privacy_WEB.pdf. Enthält Auszüge aus: Capurro, R., M, Eldred u. D. Nagel: Digital Whoness: Identity, Privacy and Freedom in the Cyberworld. Frankfurt 2013. Vgl. http://www.capurro.de/floridi.html.
  3. Cawkell, T.: ¬The information age : for better or for worse (1998) 0.01
    0.011251582 = product of:
      0.033754744 = sum of:
        0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010096614 = score(doc=2485,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
        0.02365813 = product of:
          0.04731626 = sum of:
            0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04731626 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Although the 'information poor' are already present, the arrival of a much greater gap between the 'information poor' and 'information rich' is forecast in the book: Sovereign individual, by J.D. Davidson and W. Rees-Mogg. Concludes that, if the events forecast in the book come about, there will not be an information society but an unacceptable society
    Date
    3. 1.1999 14:40:22
  4. Olivier, P.; Ananiadou, S.; Maeda, T.; Tsujii, J.: Visualisation: mediating the interchange of information from the verbal to the visual domain (1992) 0.01
    0.010872297 = product of:
      0.03261689 = sum of:
        0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 8839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008924231 = score(doc=8839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 8839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8839)
        0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 8839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02369266 = score(doc=8839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 8839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8839)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
  5. Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009) 0.01
    0.010506973 = product of:
      0.031520918 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=2790,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
        0.020700864 = product of:
          0.04140173 = sum of:
            0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04140173 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Survivors of intimate partner violence face more than information gaps; many face powerful barriers in the form of information myths. Triangulating data from in-depth interviews and community bulletin board postings, this study incorporates insights from survivors, police, and shelter staff to begin mapping the information landscape through which survivors move. An unanticipated feature of that landscape is a set of 28 compelling information myths that prevent some survivors from making effective use of the social, legal, economic, and support resources available to them. This analysis of the sources, contexts, and consequences of these information myths is the first step in devising strategies to counter their ill effects.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:16:44
  6. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.01
    0.010494012 = product of:
      0.031482037 = sum of:
        0.016695706 = weight(_text_:in in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016695706 = score(doc=5077,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2811637 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
        0.014786332 = product of:
          0.029572664 = sum of:
            0.029572664 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029572664 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    How does information lead to changes in human behavior? Why have current information theories been inadequate to shed light on this and related questions? Library and Information Science (LIS) has arrived at a crucial juncture in its relatively brief theoretical history. In addition to the cognitive and physical perspectives in our study of information, a new paradigm has been suggested; the affective paradigm. This new perspective offers keys to unlocking questions about the nature of the interaction of human and information. In recent years we have developed deeper knowledge and deeper specializations, drawing together and combining knowledge from multiple fields in order to advance our own knowledge. The relationship between information needs and information seeking has been well studied. The ways in which people use information is not as well understood because of the complex nature of human behavior. Drawing from other fields that study human behavior, however, muddies the traditional boundaries of LIS, creating some possible discomfort as we trespass into lesser known intellectual territory. Pushing our boundaries also forces questions of our self-identity as a discipline. What constitutes Library and Information Science, either in whole or in part, becomes more difficult to define and can lead to greater fragmentation. Alternatively, the incorporation of multiple perspectives may be the defining core of what constitutes LIS. The focus of this talk is to look at LIS from the outside in, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in order to shed light on questions of how information can lead to changes in human behavior. Drawing from other fields of study, the impact of information on human behavior will be explored in light of what other fields may have to offer.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22
  7. Peine, S.: Benutzerfreundlich (2002) 0.01
    0.010429325 = product of:
      0.031287972 = sum of:
        0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010096614 = score(doc=1417,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
        0.021191359 = weight(_text_:und in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021191359 = score(doc=1417,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.219024 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Kennt doch jeder: Man will in einer fremden Stadt am Automat einen Fahr schein für die Straßenbahn ziehen. Quälende Minuten später steht man immer noch vor dem vertrackten Gerät, nur viel wütender und vor' allem beschämt, weil man sich im Gewirr der Knöpfe, Straßenverzeichnisse und Tarife verheddert hat. Statt der Einzelfahrkarte für einen Erwachsenen hält man schließlich ein 24-Stunden-Familien-Ticket in der Hand. Das Ende vom Lied: Der Benutzer hält sich für technisch vertrottelt. Dabei ist genau das Gegenteil der Fall: Der Entwickler, der sich das Gerät ausdachte, besaß keinerlei Einfühlungsvermögen in die Logik des künftigen Benutzers. Nach leidvoller Erfahrung hat sich inzwischen die Erkenntnis durchgesetzt, dass Benutzerführung gelernt sein muss und sie nicht einfach technikvernarrten Ingenieuren überlassen werden darf An der Stuttgarter Hochschule für Medien gibt es deshalb seit dem Wintersemester 2001/2002 den Bachelor-Studiengang Informationsdesign - Studenten lernen in sieben Semestern, wie man Menschen sinnvoll durch den Informationsdschungel des 21. Jahrhunderts führt. Wie entwickelt man ein Orientierungsssystem für ein Museum, das den Besucher nicht in die Irre führt? Wie kommt ein Kunde am Bankautomaten zügig an sein Geld, ohne dass seine Karte wegen einer irrtümlich gedrückten Taste sofort verschluckt wird? Und wie schreibt man eine Gebrauchsanweisung, die tatsächlich ein technisches Gerät bedienen hilft? Klar, dass es hier nicht nur um Handwerk, sondern vor allem auch um das Verständnis menschlicher Kommunikation geht. In den USA und in Großbritannien ist der Studiengang Informationsdesign längst etabliert. Die Absolventen fänden problemlos Jobs, sagt der Stuttgarter Studiengangsleiter Professor Frank Thissen. Auch hier zu Lande scheint die Wirtschaft sehr angetan. Dabei hat sie das neue Berufsbild geradezu provoziert. Weil neue Produkte meist unter großem Zeitdruck entwickelt werden, sparen viele Firmen am Ende ausgerechnet an den Benutzertests. Auch manche Bedienungsanleitung verunzierte heute nicht die Welt, wäre sie zuvor nur ein einziges Mal mit technisch durchschnittlich begabten Menschen in Berührung gekommen. Welchen Nutzen hat schon ein Benutzerhandbuch, das einem derartige Anleitungen zumutet: "Wenn Sie die Druckformatvorlage eines Dokumentes mit der Druckformatvorlage einer Dokumentvorlage verbinden, ersetzen die Druckformatdefinitionen des Dokuments die gleichnamigen Druckformatdeflnitionen der Dokumentvorlage." Es gibt noch viel zu tun für die Informationsdesign-Studenten. Manchmal allerdings reichte gesunder Menschenverstand schon aus, um Peinlichkeiten zu vermeiden, so wie die Warnung auf dem Beipackzettel eines Schlafmittels: "Achtung, kann Müdigkeit verursachen!"."
  8. Time, quantum and information (2003) 0.01
    0.010328172 = product of:
      0.030984513 = sum of:
        0.0080441935 = weight(_text_:in in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0080441935 = score(doc=2900,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.13546807 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
        0.022940319 = weight(_text_:und in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022940319 = score(doc=2900,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23710044 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2004, H.11., S.92-96 (S. Stier): "Nach Einsteins Allgemeiner Relativitätstheorie gibt es im Kosmos Objekte von so ungeheurer Gravitationskraft, dass aus ihrem Inneren keinerlei Informationen, auch nicht in Form von Licht, nach außen dringen können; sie werden deshalb als Schwarze Löcher bezeichnet. Eines der vielen Rätsel, die sie umgeben, war lange Zeit die Größe ihrer Entropie (siehe »Das holografische Universum« von Jacob Bekenstein, Spektrum der Wissenschaft 11/ 2003, S. 34). Nach der herkömmlichen Definition ist die Entropie ein Maß für den Informationsgehalt eines Objekts; sie berechnet sich aus der Zahl seiner inneren Zustände, in denen es dieselben Eigenschaften hat. Damit hängt sie davon ab, welche Eigenschaften man zur Beschreibung des Objekts wählt und wie detailliert man seine inneren Zustände beschreibt. Entropie und Information sind also relative, vom Kontext einer bestimmten Beschreibung abhängige Maße. je detaillierter die Beschreibung seiner inneren Zustände, desto größer die Entropie. Nicht so bei einem Schwarzen Loch: Da es alle Informationen über sein Inneres verbirgt, ist seine Entropie die Obergrenze für alles, was man überhaupt darüber wissen könnte, unabhängig von irgendwelchen Modellen seiner Struktur. Information wird damit zu einer unabhängigen Eigenschaft eines Objekts und zu einer absoluten physikalischen Größe. Das ist ein radikaler Bruch im Verständnis von Information. Mit Hilfe der von Bekenstein vor dreißig Jahren angegebenen Formel kann man berechnen, wie die Entropie eines Schwarzen Lochs von der Größe unseres Universums dadurch zunimmt, dass von außen ein Proton hineinstürzt. Diese Änderung lässt sich als der Informationsgehalt des Protons selbst interpretieren: Es sind 10**40 Bit, ein Wert, der im Rahmen der etablierten Physik eigentlich nicht erklärbar ist.
    Zu genau diesem Ergebnis war schon einige Jahre zuvor Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker auf völlig anderem Weg gekommen. Die von ihm entwickelte Urtheorie ist der radikale Versuch, die gesamte Naturwissenschaft, mit der Quantentheorie an der Spitze, auf den Informationsbegriff zurückzuführen: Ure sind nichts weiter als die Quantenbits (»Qubits«), die im Zusammenhang mit den Quantencomputern zu Ehren gekommen sind. Dabei setzt die Urtheorie nicht einmal die Struktur des Raumes voraus; diese ergibt sich erst aus der Verknüpfung der kleinsten Informationseinheit, der Entscheidung zwischen zwei Möglichkeiten, und der Quantentheorie. Bis heute ist die Urtheorie ein Fragment geblieben; so ist es nicht gelungen, eine Theorie der Wechselwirkung der Ure zu entwickeln, die schließlich zu einer Theorie der Elementarteilchen führen sollte. Der vorliegende Sammelband ist von Weizsäcker zu seinem 90. Geburtstag gewidmet; die sehr wenigen Forscher, die an der Urtheorie weitergearbeitet haben, kommen in mehreren Beiträgen zu Wort. Der Frankfurter Physiker Thomas Görnitz fasst seine eigenen einschlägigen Arbeiten zusammen. Dazu gehört die oben genannte Verknüpfung der Entropie Schwarzer Löcher mit der Urtheorie, die für Görnitz die »zentrale Anbindung« an die etablierte Physik ist. Ausgehend von den heute bekannten Größenordnungen für Radius und Dichte des Universums kommt er zu Abschätzungen für die Entropie des gesamten Universums und die Anzahl der darin enthaltenen Nukleonen und Photonen, die nach seiner Aussage mit den empirisch bekannten Daten gut übereinstimmen. Das gelte auch für die Energie der Photonen im Universum, der so genannten » kosmischen Hintergrundstrahlung«. Die Verknüpfung der Urtheorie mit der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie führe zu einem plausiblen kosmologischen Modell, in dem sich die extreme Kleinheit der »kosmologischen Konstanten«, der Vakuumenergie des Kosmos, in natürlicher Weise ergebe. Für die etablierten Theorien stelle dies ein erhebliches Problem dar.
    Während sich die Beiträge zur Urtheorie an Spezialisten wenden, finden sich zu anderen Arbeitsgebieten von Weizsäckers eher allgemeinverständliche Darstellungen: Astro- und Kernphysik mit den thermonuklearen Prozessen in Sternen und der Entstehung der Planetensysteme sowie die Philosophie der Naturwissenschaft und der Zeit - alles in der für solche Festschriften typischen bunten Mischung. Hervorgehoben sei die Darstellung des Hamburger Friedensforschers Götz Neuneck zur deutschen Atomforschung während des Zweiten Weltkriegs und zu den nachfolgenden Bemühungen internationaler Wissenschaftler, die Institution des Kriegs nach dem Bau der Atombombe abzuschaffen. In beiden hat von Weizsäcker eine herausragende Rolle gespielt. Ein wichtiges Thema des Buchs sind die Grundlagen der Quantentheorie. Mit der Charakterisierung von Objekten durch Information ist die Urtheorie eine radikale Weiterführung der »Kopenhagener Deutung«, jener orthodoxen, aber von vielen Physikern nur mangels einer überzeugenden Alternative akzeptierten Interpretation der Quantentheorie. Ein seit deren Anfängen andauernder Streit geht darum, ob die Wellenfunktion, die Wahrscheinlichkeiten für Messergebnisse vorhersagt, gemäß der Kopenhagener Deutung das mögliche Wissen eines Beobachters darstellt oder eine davon unabhängige Realität beschreibt. Wie lebendig diese Debatte ist, machen mehrere Beiträge in diesem Buch deutlich. Hans Primas und Harald Atmanspacher lösen den Widerspruch nach dem Muster des Teilchen-Welle-Dualismus auf Beide Positionen beruhen auf unterschiedlichen Auffassungen der Wirklichkeit, die beide für eine Beschreibung der Natur je nach der zu Grunde liegenden Fragestellung notwendig seien. Claus Kiefer erläutert das Phänomen der »Dekohärenz«, wonach der quantenmechanische Messprozess in neuem Licht erscheine, wenn auch die Kopplung des Messgeräts an seine Umgebung berücksichtigt werde, denn unrealistische Überlagerungszustände im Messprozess wie die berühmte sowohl tote als auch lebendige »Schrödinger'sche Katze« seien bereits durch die Quantenmechanik selbst ausgeschlossen. Spätestens wenn der Kosmos als Ganzes betrachtet werde, komme die Kopenhagener Deutung an ihr Ende, denn hier gebe es keinen Beobachter mehr, für den die quantentheoretischen Möglichkeiten zu Fakten werden könnten.
    Einen interessanten Vorschlag machen schließlich Ceslav Brukner und Anton Zeilinger von der Universität Wien. Ganz in von Weizsäckers Sinn, die Naturwissenschaft auf Ja-Nein-Aussagen zurückzuführen, streben sie nach einer Herleitung der Quantentheorie aus der Informationstheorie. Ihr Ausgangspunkt ist die Annahme, dass jedes physikalische Objekt einen endlichen Informationsgehalt hat. Da diese Information aber nicht ausreiche, um die Resultate aus allen möglichen Messungen festzulegen, könne eine bestimmte Messung nicht mehr mit Sicherheit vorhergesagt werden. Der Indeterminismus der Quantentheorie ist damit auf ein fundamentaleres Prinzip zurückgeführt. Viele Autoren heben die Bedeutung von Weizsäckers Fragen und Antworten als Quelle der Inspiration und als Herausforderung an die etablierte Wissen schaft hervor, die in ihrer Vorausschau noch nicht an ihr Ende gekommen sei. Dem ist wenig hinzuzufügen."
  9. Smith, L.C.: "Wholly new forms of encyclopedias" : electronic knowledge in the form of hypertext (1989) 0.01
    0.010265838 = product of:
      0.030797515 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
        0.02365813 = product of:
          0.04731626 = sum of:
            0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04731626 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    7. 1.1996 22:47:52
  10. Information literacy : a position paper on information problem solving; American Association of School Librarians Position Statement (1995) 0.01
    0.010265838 = product of:
      0.030797515 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
        0.02365813 = product of:
          0.04731626 = sum of:
            0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04731626 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Adopted and formatted in 1994 and reprinted with the permission of the American Association of School Librarians. Information literacy is the term being applied to the skills of information problem solving. Identifies the key elements of information literacy and presents a rationale for integrating information literacy into all aspects of the K-12 and post secondary curriculum
    Date
    11. 4.1996 14:22:40
  11. Oxbrow, N.: Information literacy : the final key to an information society (1998) 0.01
    0.010265838 = product of:
      0.030797515 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
        0.02365813 = product of:
          0.04731626 = sum of:
            0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04731626 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The terms: information society, the information age, the knowledge based society and the knowledge driven economy are all now familiar terms. Governments have been promoting them, the media has been reporting on them and leaders use them to indicate progress and advancement. In light of all this exposure, considers just how far along the road are these societies from the industrial age towards the information age
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:55:13
  12. Swigon, M.: Information limits : definition, typology and types (2011) 0.01
    0.010265838 = product of:
      0.030797515 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
        0.02365813 = product of:
          0.04731626 = sum of:
            0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04731626 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to organize the extensive field and to compile the complete list of information limits. Design/methodology/approach - A thorough analysis of literature from the field beginning with the 1960s up to the present has been performed. Findings - A universal typology of information limits has been proposed. A list of barriers mentioned in the literature of the subject has been compiled. Research limitations/implications - The term "information limits" is not commonly used. Originality/value - The complete list of information limits with bibliographical hints (helpful for future research) is presented.
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:22:52
  13. Dillon, A.; Vaughan, M.: "It's the journey and the destination" : shape and the emergent property of genre in evaluating digital documents (1997) 0.01
    0.009845134 = product of:
      0.029535402 = sum of:
        0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008834538 = score(doc=2889,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.020700864 = product of:
          0.04140173 = sum of:
            0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04140173 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation is a limited metaphor for hypermedia and website use that potentially constraints our understanding of human-computer interaction. Traces the emergence of the navigation metaphor and the emprical analysis of navigation measures in usability evaluation before suggesting an alternative concept to consider: shape. The shape concept affords a richer analytic tool for considering humans' use of digital documents and invokes social level analysis of meaning that are shared among discourse communities who both produce and consume the information resources
    Date
    6. 2.1999 20:10:22
  14. Chaitin, G.J.: Algorithmic information theory (1987) 0.01
    0.00979274 = product of:
      0.02937822 = sum of:
        0.009274333 = weight(_text_:in in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009274333 = score(doc=4175,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
        0.020103889 = weight(_text_:und in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020103889 = score(doc=4175,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Chaitin, the inventor of algorithmic information theory, presents in this book the strongest possible version of Gödel's incompleteness theorem, using an information theoretic approach based on the size of computer programs. One half of the book is concerned with studying the halting probability of a universal computer if its program is chosen by tossing a coin. The other half is concerned with encoding the halting probability as an algebraic equation in integers, a so-called exponential diophantine equation.
    BK
    31.02 (Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie der Mathematik)
    Classification
    31.02 (Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie der Mathematik)
    Series
    Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science ; 1
  15. Verdi, M.P.; Kulhavy, R.W.; Stock, W.A.; Rittscho, K.A.; Savenye, W.: Why maps improve memory for text : the influence of structural information on working-memory operations (1993) 0.01
    0.009484224 = product of:
      0.028452672 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=2090,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:18:18
  16. Bruce, C.S.: ¬The relational approach : a new model for information literacy (1997) 0.01
    0.009484224 = product of:
      0.028452672 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=408,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The dominant approaches in information literacy scholarship and research conflict with constructivist approaches to learning preferred by educators. Proposes an alternative, 'relational', model of information literacy which reveals a picture of information literacy that is constructed in terms of varying relations between people and information. These relations are captured in 7 categories, graphially conveyed through awareness structures, which together represent information literacy as it is experienced. Information literacy education may be interpreted as helping people to experience information use differently. This model demonstrates that: the meanings associated with information literacy by information professionals may not be shared by users; the experienced meaning of information literacy is fluid and contextually bound; and, understanding of information literacy and related concepts will deepen if the experience of information users is given priority in research. Proposes an agenda for information literacy research based upon the relational approach
    Source
    New review of information and library research. 3(1997), S.1-22
  17. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.01
    0.009484224 = product of:
      0.028452672 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=909,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  18. Atran, S.; Medin, D.L.; Ross, N.: Evolution and devolution of knowledge : a tale of two biologies (2004) 0.01
    0.009484224 = product of:
      0.028452672 = sum of:
        0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010709076 = score(doc=479,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
        0.017743597 = product of:
          0.035487194 = sum of:
            0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035487194 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Anthropological inquiry suggests that all societies classify animals and plants in similar ways. Paradoxically, in the same cultures that have seen large advances in biological science, citizenry's practical knowledge of nature has dramatically diminished. Here we describe historical, cross-cultural and developmental research on how people ordinarily conceptualize organic nature (folkbiology), concentrating on cognitive consequences associated with knowledge devolution. We show that results on psychological studies of categorization and reasoning from "standard populations" fail to generalize to humanity at large. Usual populations (Euro-American college students) have impoverished experience with nature, which yields misleading results about knowledge acquisition and the ontogenetic relationship between folkbiology and folkpsychology. We also show that groups living in the same habitat can manifest strikingly distinct behaviors, cognitions and social relations relative to it. This has novel implications for environmental decision making and management, including commons problems.
    Date
    23. 1.2022 10:22:18
  19. Philosophy, computing and information science (2014) 0.01
    0.009466215 = product of:
      0.028398644 = sum of:
        0.009444519 = weight(_text_:in in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009444519 = score(doc=3407,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
        0.018954126 = weight(_text_:und in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018954126 = score(doc=3407,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    BK
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Introduction: Philosophy's Relevance in Computing and Information Science - Ruth Hagengruber and Uwe V.Riss Part I: Philosophy of Computing and Information 1 The Fourth Revolution in our Self-Understanding - Luciano Floridi -- 2 Information Transfer as a Metaphor - Jakob Krebs -- 3 With Aristotle towards a Differentiated Concept of Information? - Uwe Voigt -- 4 The Influence of Philosophy on the Understanding of Computing and Information - Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski -- Part II: Complexity and System Theory 5 The Emergence of Self-Conscious Systems: From Symbolic AI to Embodied Robotics - Klaus Mainzer -- 6 Artificial Intelligence as a New Metaphysical Project - Aziz F. Zambak Part III: Ontology 7 The Relevance of Philosophical Ontology to Information and Computer Science - Barry Smith -- 8 Ontology, its Origins and its Meaning in Information Science - Jens Kohne -- 9 Smart Questions: Steps towards an Ontology of Questions and Answers - Ludwig Jaskolla and Matthias Rugel Part IV: Knowledge Representation 10 Sophisticated Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Requires Philosophy - Selmer Bringsjord, Micah Clark and Joshua Taylor -- 11 On Frames and Theory-Elements of Structuralism Holger Andreas -- 12 Ontological Complexity and Human Culture David J. Saab and Frederico Fonseca Part V: Action Theory 13 Knowledge and Action between Abstraction and Concretion - Uwe V.Riss -- 14 Action-Directing Construction of Reality in Product Creation Using Social Software: Employing Philosophy to Solve Real-World Problems - Kai Holzweifiig and Jens Krüger -- 15 An Action-Theory-Based Treatment ofTemporal Individuals - Tillmann Pross -- 16 Four Rules for Classifying Social Entities - Ludger Jansen Part VI: Info-Computationalism 17 Info-Computationalism and Philosophical Aspects of Research in Information Sciences - Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic -- 18 Pancomputationalism: Theory or Metaphor ? - Vincent C. Mutter Part VII: Ethics 19 The Importance of the Sources of Professional Obligations - Francis C. Dane
    RSWK
    Technikphilosophie / Künstliche Intelligenz / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Technikphilosophie / Künstliche Intelligenz / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Aufsatzsammlung
  20. Gleick, J.: ¬The information : a history, a theory, a flood (2011) 0.01
    0.0093849255 = product of:
      0.028154776 = sum of:
        0.0044621155 = weight(_text_:in in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044621155 = score(doc=4979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
        0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02369266 = score(doc=4979,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    BK
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 62(2011) no.12, S.2543-2545 (C.H. Davis)
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichtee (BVB)
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichtee (BVB)

Years

Types

  • a 425
  • m 65
  • el 20
  • s 19
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications