-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.02
0.018595984 = product of:
0.03719197 = sum of:
0.03719197 = product of:
0.05578795 = sum of:
0.018678864 = weight(_text_:h in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018678864 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.012369696 = product of:
0.024739392 = sum of:
0.024739392 = product of:
0.07421818 = sum of:
0.07421818 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07421818 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000)
0.01
0.010847658 = product of:
0.021695316 = sum of:
0.021695316 = product of:
0.032542974 = sum of:
0.010896005 = weight(_text_:h in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010896005 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.021646967 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021646967 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.01
0.01030808 = product of:
0.02061616 = sum of:
0.02061616 = product of:
0.06184848 = sum of:
0.06184848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06184848 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.008746697 = product of:
0.017493393 = sum of:
0.017493393 = product of:
0.05248018 = sum of:
0.05248018 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05248018 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.008246465 = product of:
0.01649293 = sum of:
0.01649293 = product of:
0.049478784 = sum of:
0.049478784 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049478784 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.008246465 = product of:
0.01649293 = sum of:
0.01649293 = product of:
0.049478784 = sum of:
0.049478784 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049478784 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.008246465 = product of:
0.01649293 = sum of:
0.01649293 = product of:
0.049478784 = sum of:
0.049478784 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049478784 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
¬Der Alte Realkatalog der Staatsbibliothek ist online (2006)
0.01
0.00822272 = product of:
0.01644544 = sum of:
0.01644544 = product of:
0.024668159 = sum of:
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 4876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=4876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4876)
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 4876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=4876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4876)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- D
- Source
- BuB. 58(2006) H.1, S.16
-
hbz: ¬Das Suchraum-Konzept (2007)
0.01
0.00822272 = product of:
0.01644544 = sum of:
0.01644544 = product of:
0.024668159 = sum of:
0.015565722 = weight(_text_:h in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015565722 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.009102437 = weight(_text_:d in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009102437 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- D
- Source
- BuB. 59(2007) H.5, S.345
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.007215656 = product of:
0.014431312 = sum of:
0.014431312 = product of:
0.043293934 = sum of:
0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043293934 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.01
0.007215656 = product of:
0.014431312 = sum of:
0.014431312 = product of:
0.043293934 = sum of:
0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043293934 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
82 Millionen Titel in 470 Sprachen : Deutsche Nationalbibliothek ist Bestandteil des weltweit größten Bibliothekskatalogs (2007)
0.01
0.0065781754 = product of:
0.013156351 = sum of:
0.013156351 = product of:
0.019734526 = sum of:
0.012452577 = weight(_text_:h in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012452577 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.0072819493 = weight(_text_:d in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072819493 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- D
- Source
- BuB. 59(2007) H.6, S.407
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.01
0.006184848 = product of:
0.012369696 = sum of:
0.012369696 = product of:
0.03710909 = sum of:
0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710909 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.01
0.00515404 = product of:
0.01030808 = sum of:
0.01030808 = product of:
0.03092424 = sum of:
0.03092424 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03092424 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Weber, A.: "HeiIFASTen" - Entschlacken mit Leistungsgewinn : Neue Möglichkeiten für Bibliothekskataloge durch den Einsatz von Suchmaschinentechnologie (2007)
0.00
0.0049336315 = product of:
0.009867263 = sum of:
0.009867263 = product of:
0.014800894 = sum of:
0.009339432 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009339432 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.005461462 = weight(_text_:d in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005461462 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.06297245 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- D
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.225
-
Libraries and Google (2005)
0.00
0.004148759 = product of:
0.008297518 = sum of:
0.008297518 = product of:
0.012446277 = sum of:
0.008805302 = weight(_text_:h in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008805302 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.077639036 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.0036409746 = weight(_text_:d in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036409746 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.041981634 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Co-published simultaneously as Internet reference services quarterly, vol. 10(1005), nos. 3/4 Rez. in: ZfBB 54(2007) H.2, S.98-99 (D. Lewandowski): "Google und Bibliotheken? Meist hat man leider den Eindruck, dass hier eher ein oder gedacht wird. Dies sehen auch die Herausgeber des vorliegenden Bandes und nehmen deshalb neben Beiträgen zur Diskussion um die Rolle der Bibliotheken im Zeitalter von Google auch solche auf, die Tipps zur Verwendung unterschiedlicher Google-Dienste geben. Die allgemeine Diskussion um Google und die Bibliotheken dreht sich vor allem um die Rolle, die Bibliotheken (mit ihren Informationsportalen) noch spielen können, wenn ihre Nutzer sowieso bei Google suchen, auch wenn die Bibliotheksangebote (zumindest von den Bibliothekaren) als überlegen empfunden werden. Auch wenn die Nutzer geschult werden, greifen sie doch meist lieber zur einfachen Recherchemöglichkeit bei Google oder anderen Suchmaschinen - vielleicht lässt sich die Situation am besten mit dem Satz eines im Buch zitierten Bibliothekars ausdrücken: »Everyone starts with Google except librarians.« (5.95) Sollen die Bibliotheken nun Google die einfache Recherche ganz überlassen und sich auf die komplexeren Suchfragen konzentrieren? Oder verlieren sie dadurch eine Nutzerschaft, die sich mittlerweile gar nicht mehr vorstellen kann, dass man mit anderen Werkzeugen als Suchmaschinen bessere Ergebnisse erzielen kann? Diese sicherlich für die Zukunft der Bibliotheken maßgebliche Frage wird in mehreren Beiträgen diskutiert, wobei auffällt, dass die jeweiligen Autoren keine klare Antwort bieten können, wie Bibliotheken ihre Quellen so präsentieren können, dass die Nutzer mit der Recherche so zufrieden sind, dass sie freiwillig in den Bibliotheksangeboten anstatt in Google recherchieren. Den Schwerpunkt des Buchs machen aber nicht diese eher theoretischen Aufsätze aus, sondern solche, die sich mit konkreten Google-Diensten beschäftigen. Aufgrund ihrer Nähe zu den Bibliotheksangeboten bzw. den Aufgaben der Bibliotheken sind dies vor allem Google Print und Google Scholar, aber auch die Google Search Appliance. Bei letzterer handelt es sich um eine integrierte Hard- und Softwarelösung, die die Indexierung von Inhalten aus unterschiedlichen Datenquellen ermöglicht. Der Aufsatz von Mary Taylor beschreibt die Vor- und Nachteile des Systems anhand der praktischen Anwendung in der University of Nevada.
Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.00
0.0041232323 = product of:
0.008246465 = sum of:
0.008246465 = product of:
0.024739392 = sum of:
0.024739392 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024739392 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.00
0.0041232323 = product of:
0.008246465 = sum of:
0.008246465 = product of:
0.024739392 = sum of:
0.024739392 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024739392 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wesseling, M.G.: OCLC PICA : committed to libraries in Europe (2002)
0.00
0.0036320016 = product of:
0.007264003 = sum of:
0.007264003 = product of:
0.02179201 = sum of:
0.02179201 = weight(_text_:h in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02179201 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045649286 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 49(2002) H.4, S.221-226
