-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.07
0.06753081 = product of:
0.13506162 = sum of:
0.13506162 = sum of:
0.074088484 = weight(_text_:1998 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074088484 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17371792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.4264873 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.06097314 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06097314 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.03
0.033765405 = product of:
0.06753081 = sum of:
0.06753081 = sum of:
0.037044242 = weight(_text_:1998 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037044242 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17371792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.21324365 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.03048657 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03048657 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.01829194 = product of:
0.03658388 = sum of:
0.03658388 = product of:
0.07316776 = sum of:
0.07316776 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07316776 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.012934357 = product of:
0.025868714 = sum of:
0.025868714 = product of:
0.051737428 = sum of:
0.051737428 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051737428 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.012194628 = product of:
0.024389256 = sum of:
0.024389256 = product of:
0.04877851 = sum of:
0.04877851 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04877851 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.012194628 = product of:
0.024389256 = sum of:
0.024389256 = product of:
0.04877851 = sum of:
0.04877851 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04877851 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.012194628 = product of:
0.024389256 = sum of:
0.024389256 = product of:
0.04877851 = sum of:
0.04877851 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04877851 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.01
0.010670299 = product of:
0.021340597 = sum of:
0.021340597 = product of:
0.042681195 = sum of:
0.042681195 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042681195 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.01
0.010670299 = product of:
0.021340597 = sum of:
0.021340597 = product of:
0.042681195 = sum of:
0.042681195 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042681195 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.01
0.010477694 = product of:
0.020955388 = sum of:
0.020955388 = product of:
0.041910775 = sum of:
0.041910775 = weight(_text_:1998 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041910775 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17371792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.24125765 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.01
0.00914597 = product of:
0.01829194 = sum of:
0.01829194 = product of:
0.03658388 = sum of:
0.03658388 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03658388 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.01
0.00914597 = product of:
0.01829194 = sum of:
0.01829194 = product of:
0.03658388 = sum of:
0.03658388 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03658388 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.01
0.006097314 = product of:
0.012194628 = sum of:
0.012194628 = product of:
0.024389256 = sum of:
0.024389256 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024389256 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.01
0.006097314 = product of:
0.012194628 = sum of:
0.012194628 = product of:
0.024389256 = sum of:
0.024389256 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024389256 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000)
0.01
0.0053351494 = product of:
0.010670299 = sum of:
0.010670299 = product of:
0.021340597 = sum of:
0.021340597 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021340597 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15759358 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045003213 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
