-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.12
0.11575418 = sum of:
0.096695825 = product of:
0.29008746 = sum of:
0.29008746 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29008746 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4424171 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.019058352 = product of:
0.038116705 = sum of:
0.038116705 = weight(_text_:systems in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038116705 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
- Source
- IBM systems journal. 44(2005) no.4, S.887-903
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.10
0.10409279 = sum of:
0.08288213 = product of:
0.24864638 = sum of:
0.24864638 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24864638 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4424171 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.021210661 = product of:
0.042421322 = sum of:
0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042421322 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002)
0.09
0.09266427 = product of:
0.18532854 = sum of:
0.18532854 = sum of:
0.06534292 = weight(_text_:systems in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06534292 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.119985625 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119985625 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:15:14
-
Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005)
0.09
0.08760825 = product of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07623341 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
0.09898309 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09898309 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
-
Domingue, J.; Motta, E.: PlanetOnto : from news publishing to integrated knowledge management support (2000)
0.09
0.08760825 = product of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07623341 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
0.09898309 = weight(_text_:22 in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09898309 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2002 11:47:22
- Source
- IEEE intelligent systems. 15(2000) no.2, S.26-32
-
Adams, S.: Comparing the IPC and the US classification systems for the patent searcher (2001)
0.09
0.08760825 = product of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.1752165 = sum of:
0.07623341 = weight(_text_:systems in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07623341 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.09898309 = weight(_text_:22 in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09898309 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 3.2002 15:22:31
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.08
0.077220224 = product of:
0.15444045 = sum of:
0.15444045 = sum of:
0.054452434 = weight(_text_:systems in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054452434 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.09998801 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09998801 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007)
0.08
0.07509278 = product of:
0.15018556 = sum of:
0.15018556 = sum of:
0.06534292 = weight(_text_:systems in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06534292 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.084842645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084842645 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This note is also appearing in the Journal of the American Society for Information Systems and Technology.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 14:22:47
-
Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008)
0.08
0.07509278 = product of:
0.15018556 = sum of:
0.15018556 = sum of:
0.06534292 = weight(_text_:systems in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06534292 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
0.084842645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084842645 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Präsentation anlässlich: NKOS 2008 - Networked Knowledge Organization Systems, September 19th 2008 ECDL-Conference, Arhus.
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 19:30:41
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.07
0.06600664 = product of:
0.13201328 = sum of:
0.13201328 = sum of:
0.07545151 = weight(_text_:systems in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07545151 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4704818 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056561764 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Yetim, F.: Universal Actability : Towards an integral understanding of universal usability, (intercultural) action competence, and information systems actability (2004)
0.06
0.064430945 = product of:
0.12886189 = sum of:
0.12886189 = sum of:
0.08644056 = weight(_text_:systems in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08644056 = score(doc=377,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.5390046 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042421322 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The approach to information systems actability emphasizes the social action character of information systems and its social context. It aims at a pragmatically and social sensitive approach to information systems. This paper extends the scope and focus of this approach by suggesting a research framework called universal actability. The research framework advocates for an integral understanding of universal usability, human communication and action competence, and information systems actability. To pursue this research objective, this paper focuses on the following aspects: It provides a critical review of the concepts of the previous research on information systems actability and suggests some extensions and revisions towards universal actability. In addition, it discusses several maxims for (intercultural) communications and their implications for the actors and systems. Finally, it reflects on the applicability of user modeling technology for modeling diversity in order to enhance actor's and system's actability across diverse contexts.
- Date
- 22. 6.2007 13:31:31
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.06
0.061776184 = product of:
0.12355237 = sum of:
0.12355237 = sum of:
0.043561947 = weight(_text_:systems in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043561947 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.07999042 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07999042 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.06
0.05908383 = product of:
0.11816766 = sum of:
0.11816766 = sum of:
0.061605897 = weight(_text_:systems in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061605897 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056561764 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006)
0.06
0.05908383 = product of:
0.11816766 = sum of:
0.11816766 = sum of:
0.061605897 = weight(_text_:systems in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061605897 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.056561764 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056561764 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.06
0.057755806 = product of:
0.11551161 = sum of:
0.11551161 = sum of:
0.06602007 = weight(_text_:systems in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06602007 = score(doc=5365,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049491543 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.06
0.05773846 = product of:
0.11547692 = sum of:
0.11547692 = sum of:
0.0730556 = weight(_text_:systems in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0730556 = score(doc=201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042421322 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.05
0.053882122 = product of:
0.107764244 = sum of:
0.107764244 = sum of:
0.06534292 = weight(_text_:systems in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06534292 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.042421322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042421322 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.05
0.05309862 = product of:
0.10619724 = sum of:
0.10619724 = sum of:
0.04620442 = weight(_text_:systems in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04620442 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.059992813 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059992813 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006)
0.05
0.051698353 = product of:
0.10339671 = sum of:
0.10339671 = sum of:
0.053905163 = weight(_text_:systems in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053905163 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049491543 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:05:39
-
Tsakonas, G.; Papatheodorou, C.: Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries (2008)
0.05
0.051698353 = product of:
0.10339671 = sum of:
0.10339671 = sum of:
0.053905163 = weight(_text_:systems in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053905163 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16037072 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.049491543 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049491543 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1827397 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052184064 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Advances in the publishing world have emerged new models of digital library development. Open access publishing modes are expanding their presence and realize the digital library idea in various means. While user-centered evaluation of digital libraries has drawn considerable attention during the last years, these systems are currently viewed from the publishing, economic and scientometric perspectives. The present study explores the concepts of usefulness and usability in the evaluation of an e-print archive. The results demonstrate that several attributes of usefulness, such as the level and the relevance of information, and usability, such as easiness of use and learnability, as well as functionalities commonly met in these systems, affect user interaction and satisfaction.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 11:49:22
