Search (100 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.00 
    0.0046249838 = product of:
  0.018499935 = sum of:
    0.018499935 = product of:
      0.03699987 = sum of:
        0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03699987 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  2. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.00 
    0.0046249838 = product of:
  0.018499935 = sum of:
    0.018499935 = product of:
      0.03699987 = sum of:
        0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03699987 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  3. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.00 
    0.0046249838 = product of:
  0.018499935 = sum of:
    0.018499935 = product of:
      0.03699987 = sum of:
        0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03699987 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  4. Kapustina, T.A.: Electronic library, electronic publishing, electronic document delivery : impressions from a Belarusian-German seminar (2002) 0.00 
    0.0039571873 = product of:
  0.01582875 = sum of:
    0.01582875 = product of:
      0.0316575 = sum of:
        0.0316575 = weight(_text_:software in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0316575 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    There is an "information burst" going on in our world. Therefore we think more about the role of information in modern society and in our personal life. The political waves of the peaceful revolutionary process virtually start to erase the borders of the countries drawn on the maps. A little more than ten years ago we had not even a concept for "Belarusian-German relations", because both countries "the new united Germany and the Republic of Belarus did not exist on the maps of the world. Today the communication between our countries covers all aspects of public life "culture" science and education. We have laid a foundation for our economic and cultural cooperation. We already have had some experience in the joint solution of internal and international problems. And "what is most striking" the warm human contacts of the people consolidate and accelerate the process of mutual understanding between our countries and broaden our view. Today no country in the world can yield their citizens more freedom of choice than the "state" of the Internet. The people, freely migrating in a boundless information space, know how to use the invaluable treasures of human thought and creatively increase the achievements of mankind by intellectual work. These people become the pride of every country in our time. In educating, shaping and supporting such persons we see a new social role of the libraries. It is clearly visible that libraries turn into modern information centers. The introduction of new information know-how and the access to electronic information by means of an electronic library satisfy the increasing need of effective and comprehensive information. All steps of the work with documents (publication "search" delivery) are automated. The fast electronic delivery of documents is promoted by the growth of global information networks, by the increase of transfer rates of dates" by the capability of online search in the electronic catalogues and databases connected with the automated systems of the ordering of copies, by the technical equipment and software of scanning and recognition of the text.
  5. Bayer, M.: ¬Die Gier der Bits und Bytes auf Gutenberg : Elektronisches Publizieren, Drucken und das papierlose E-Book melden sich in Frankfurt zu Wort (2000) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=5391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  6. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  7. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  9. Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:38:55
  10. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.00 
    0.0038541534 = product of:
  0.015416614 = sum of:
    0.015416614 = product of:
      0.030833228 = sum of:
        0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030833228 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Migl, J.: Verteilte Ressourcen, zentraler Nachweis: elektronische Dokumente und das "Zentrale Verzeichnis digitalisierter Drucke" (zvdd) : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen eines Portals (2008) 0.00 
    0.0034625386 = product of:
  0.013850154 = sum of:
    0.013850154 = product of:
      0.027700309 = sum of:
        0.027700309 = weight(_text_:software in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027700309 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.15340936 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Voraussetzungen und Zielvorgaben Im Laufe der letzten ungefähr 10 Jahre sind in Deutschland zahlreiche Digitalisierungsprojekte durchgeführt worden. Die Mehrzahl davon war und ist an Bibliotheken angesiedelt, daneben stehen aber nicht wenige Projekte, die von Akademien, MaxPlanck-Instituten, einzelnen Universitätsinstituten und anderen Projektnehmern beantragt und durchgeführt wurden. Selbst wenn man die Zählung auf die DFG-finanzierten Projekte beschränkt, ist man schnell in der Größenordnung von weit über 100 Projekten, ohne Berücksichtigung der mindestens noch einmal so vielen von anderer Seite unterstützten oder privat durchgeführten Unternehmungen2. Was am Beginn der großen Digitalisierungskampagnen noch durchaus gewollt war, nämlich die Förderung unterschiedlicher Verfahren und Methoden, die Anwendung verschiedener technischer Lösungen bei Hard- und Software, die freie Hand für die Projektleiter bei der Entwicklung von Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, bei Erschließungsmethoden und Navigationsinstrumenten, entpuppte sich jedoch nach und nach als strategischer Nachteil. Gewiss: Man hatte auf diese Weise eine Vielzahl an Erfahrungen sammeln und für die Formulierung von Empfehlungen nutzen können. Vor allem bei der Ausarbeitung von technischen Standards mag es hilfreich gewesen sein, auf möglichst viele unterschiedliche Erfahrungen zurückgreifen zu können. Im Ergebnis aber entstanden so viele Realisierungen, wie es Projekte gab. Jedes stand für sich mit einem individuellen Auftritt im Netz und wartete auf Kundschaft, die - wie wir heute wissen - aber nicht in der erhofften Frequenz die neuen Angebote nutzte. Spätestens bei einem Seitenblick auf die parallel entstehenden Strukturen im Ausland musste die sehr bunte deutsche Digitalisierungs-landschaft mehr und mehr als ein eher bedenkliches Konzept erscheinen. Der Verzicht auf Standardisierung und Zentralisierung, das Nebeneinander von jeweils für die Projekte sinnvollen, aber in der Regel nicht nachnutzbaren Projektarchitekturen begann sich zu rächen, denn die potenziellen Nutzer der bereitgestellten Dokumente fanden diese entweder nicht oder verloren schnell die Lust, in jedem neuen Projekt wieder mit dem Studium der Betriebsanleitung zu beginnen. Als sich dann vor dem Hintergrund des Erfolges von Google die Vorstellung durchsetzte, das weltweite Netz lasse sich leicht und vollständig von einem einfachen Suchschlitz aus durchkämmen, wuchs hierzulande der Druck, hinter den vielen bunten Mosaiksteinchen doch noch das eigentliche Bild erkennbar werden zu lassen. Ein zweifellos lohnendes Ziel sind doch die in den Projekten erarbeiteten Angebote und Standards zumeist von hoher Qualität. Der Plan fügte sich zudem leicht in die aktuellen strategischen Zielvorstellungen von einer homogenen digitalen Bibliothek Deutschland, sogar einer europäischen digitalen Bibliothek oder gemeinsamen Portalen von Bibliotheken, Museen und Archiven, in welchen die in den Einzelprojekten erzielten Ergebnisse letzten Endes aufgehen sollen.
  12. Woltering, H.: ¬Der automatische Download von Netzpublikationen durch Bibliotheken und ihre Nutzung (2008) 0.00 
    0.0030833227 = product of:
  0.012333291 = sum of:
    0.012333291 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = weight(_text_:22 in 1982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666581 = score(doc=1982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1982)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Im "Gesetz über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNBG)" vom 22. Juni 2006 erhielt die Bibliothek nicht nur den Auftrag, wie bisher Medienwerke in körperlicher Form (alle Darstellungen auf Papier, elektronischen Datenträgern und anderen Trägern), sondern auch Medienwerke in unkörperlicher Form (alle Darstellungen in öffentlichen Netzen) zu sammeln. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) will zu diesem Zweck zum Sommer 2008 die Pflichtablieferungsverordnung und die Sammelrichtlinien neu fassen. Diese Vorgaben sehen vor, dass die Sammlung von Online-Publikationen (im Folgenden auch: Netzpublikationen, elektronische Publikationen, E-Publikationen) in einem stufenweisen Verfahren ablaufen soll. Die DNB formulierte diese drei Schritte folgendermaßen: - Direkte Kooperation mit Ablieferern oder Kooperation mit aggregierenden Partnern hinsichtlich der Sammlung einzeln identifizierbarer Online-Publikationen. Entsprechende Verfahren wurden bereits vor Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek genutzt. Die bisherigen Erfahrungen dienen dazu, Weiterentwicklungen und Verbesserungen auf einer praktischen Basis und mittels gängiger vorhandener Standards voranzutreiben. In die Übelegungen fließen auch Möglichkeiten der Nutzung bestehender Vertriebswege einzelner Sparten ein. - Implementierung einer generell nutzbaren Schnittstelle auf der Website der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek für die Ablieferung einzeln identifizierbarer Netzpublikationen in einem standardisierten Verfahren. Diese Schnittstelle wird bereits seit einigen Jahren genutzt und derzeit für größere Ablieferungsvolumina optimiert. - Erprobung von Harvesting-Methoden für die Sammlung bzw. den Abruf definierter kleinerer oder größerer Domainbereiche. In diese Fragestellung fällt auch das Einsammeln ganzer Objektgruppen wie etwa Websites aller Bundesbehörden oder thematische Sammlungen zu besonderen nationalen Ereignissen wie Bundestagswahlen. Deutlich wird hier jedoch, dass der Prozess der Verfahrensfindung noch im Gange ist. Ebenso augenscheinlich ist, dass zwischen der freiwilligen Ablieferung von E-Publikationen durch die publizierenden Organisationen und der Sicherung ganzer Websites noch die automatisierte Sicherung der einzelnen elektronischen Publikationen von den Organisations-Websites stehen könnte und sollte. Der Download durch Bibliotheken erscheint sinnvoll, da die Ablieferung eigener E-Publikationen oft nicht selbständig durch die Organisationen erfolgt, sondern meist regelmäßig eingefordert werden muss. Hinzu kommt, dass sich der Sammelauftrag der DNB naturgemäß auf die Netzpublikationen deutscher Organisationen bezieht, nicht jedoch auf elektronische Veröffentlichungen außerdeutscher Einrichtungen,die z.B. auch für SSG- Bibliotheken mit regional oder thematisch ausgerichtet m Sammelauftrag interessant wären.
  13. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.00 
    0.0030833227 = product of:
  0.012333291 = sum of:
    0.012333291 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666581 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  14. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.00 
    0.0030833227 = product of:
  0.012333291 = sum of:
    0.012333291 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666581 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.00 
    0.0030833227 = product of:
  0.012333291 = sum of:
    0.012333291 = product of:
      0.024666581 = sum of:
        0.024666581 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666581 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Sülzer, T.: ¬Die komplette Rundschau jetzt im Internet : "E-Paper"-Ausgabe mit sämtlichen Beilagen online lesen - für Abonnenten völlig kostenlos (2005) 0.00 
    0.0026979074 = product of:
  0.01079163 = sum of:
    0.01079163 = product of:
      0.02158326 = sum of:
        0.02158326 = weight(_text_:22 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02158326 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  17. Ramm, T.: ¬Der Computer ersetzt den Lesesaal : Die Wissenschaftspublikation im digitalen Zeitalter - Verleger und Bibliothekare müssen künftig Informationsvermeidung betreiben (2001) 0.00 
    0.0023124919 = product of:
  0.0092499675 = sum of:
    0.0092499675 = product of:
      0.018499935 = sum of:
        0.018499935 = weight(_text_:22 in 5634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018499935 = score(doc=5634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 5634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    21. 6.2005 19:53:22
  18. Siegle, J.: Programmabsturz : Immer mehr Internet-Zeitschriften stehen vor dem Aus - jüngstes Opfer ist das US-Magazin 'The Industry Standard' (2000) 0.00 
    0.0023124919 = product of:
  0.0092499675 = sum of:
    0.0092499675 = product of:
      0.018499935 = sum of:
        0.018499935 = weight(_text_:22 in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018499935 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  19. Siegle, J.: @lles hat ein Ende : Im Sog der kriselnden Web-Wirtschaft kämpfen immer mehr Internet-Zeitschriften um ihr Überleben (2001) 0.00 
    0.0019270767 = product of:
  0.007708307 = sum of:
    0.007708307 = product of:
      0.015416614 = sum of:
        0.015416614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015416614 = score(doc=2058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2058)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  20. Lingner, M.: Gutenberg 2.0 oder die Neuerfindung des Buches (2009) 0.00 
    0.0019270767 = product of:
  0.007708307 = sum of:
    0.007708307 = product of:
      0.015416614 = sum of:
        0.015416614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015416614 = score(doc=2869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045514934 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 6.2009 15:13:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 50
  • e 50

Themes