Search (494 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for editors and publishers (1987) 0.10
    0.09611295 = sum of:
      0.09026123 = product of:
        0.3610449 = sum of:
          0.3610449 = weight(_text_:editors in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3610449 = score(doc=5941,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              1.0489501 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.005851723 = product of:
        0.011703446 = sum of:
          0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011703446 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Guidelines for editors and publishers of scholarly texts to which markup has been added in accordance with the SGML
    Language
    e
  2. Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995) 0.09
    0.08699572 = sum of:
      0.0382946 = product of:
        0.1531784 = sum of:
          0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1531784 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.048701126 = sum of:
        0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007022067 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
        0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04167906 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
    
    Abstract
    This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
    Date
    22. 1.1996 18:26:45
    Language
    e
  3. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.06
    0.064934835 = product of:
      0.12986967 = sum of:
        0.12986967 = sum of:
          0.018725513 = weight(_text_:e in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018725513 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.111144155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.111144155 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  4. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.06
    0.064934835 = product of:
      0.12986967 = sum of:
        0.12986967 = sum of:
          0.018725513 = weight(_text_:e in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018725513 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.111144155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.111144155 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  5. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.06
    0.05681798 = product of:
      0.11363596 = sum of:
        0.11363596 = sum of:
          0.016384823 = weight(_text_:e in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016384823 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.09725113 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09725113 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  6. Hayashi, K; Sekilima, A.: Mediating interface between hypertext and structured documents (1993) 0.06
    0.05574084 = sum of:
      0.051059462 = product of:
        0.20423785 = sum of:
          0.20423785 = weight(_text_:editors in 8411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20423785 = score(doc=8411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 8411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8411)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.004681378 = product of:
        0.009362756 = sum of:
          0.009362756 = weight(_text_:e in 8411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009362756 = score(doc=8411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 8411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8411)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a unified document model for an authoring system that focuses on the stage of drafting and revising and takes advantage of both hypertext and structured document models. Discusses the underlying structure and the surface of the document models and its key features. Describes Nelumbo, a prototype system currently being developed which integrates different types of editors that ahndle features of hypertext and structured documents. Users can use any of the tools at will, and editing with the tools affects the underlying structure consistently
    Language
    e
  7. Pack, T.: ¬The electronic editor (1996) 0.06
    0.05574084 = sum of:
      0.051059462 = product of:
        0.20423785 = sum of:
          0.20423785 = weight(_text_:editors in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20423785 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.004681378 = product of:
        0.009362756 = sum of:
          0.009362756 = weight(_text_:e in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009362756 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The skills of editors are undervalued by the information industry. Some online media are beginning to follow a television model instead of a newspaper or book model. The danger this trend represents is that more and more information providers will adopt a style over substance strategy and overlook the fact that editorial skills are essential to the creation of high quality electronic databases
    Language
    e
  8. Kommers, P.A.M.; Ferreira, A.; Kwak, A.K.: Document management for hypermedia design (1997) 0.06
    0.05574084 = sum of:
      0.051059462 = product of:
        0.20423785 = sum of:
          0.20423785 = weight(_text_:editors in 7515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20423785 = score(doc=7515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 7515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7515)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.004681378 = product of:
        0.009362756 = sum of:
          0.009362756 = weight(_text_:e in 7515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009362756 = score(doc=7515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 7515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7515)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic texts offer new ways to store, retrieve, update, and cross-link information. Hypermedia documents require new levels of organization and strict discipline from authors, editors, and managers. This book provides a step-by step guide to all aspects of hypermedia development, from strategic decision-making to editing formats and production methods
    Language
    e
  9. Harter, S.P.; Park, T.K.: Impact of prior electronic publication on manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals (2000) 0.05
    0.054369695 = sum of:
      0.051059462 = product of:
        0.20423785 = sum of:
          0.20423785 = weight(_text_:editors in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20423785 = score(doc=4997,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0033102343 = product of:
        0.0066204686 = sum of:
          0.0066204686 = weight(_text_:e in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066204686 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to study current policies and practices of scholarly journals on evaluating manuscripts for publication that had been previously published electronically. Various electronic forms were considered: a manuscript having been e-mailed to members of a listserv, attached to a personal or institutional home page, stored in an electronic preprint collection, or published in an electronic proceedings or electronic journal. Factors that might affect the consideration of such manuscripts were also examined, including characteristics of the journal, the previously published work, and the submitted manuscript. A sample of 202 scholarly journals in the sciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities was selected for study. A questionnaire and cover letters were sent to the journal editors in the summer and fall of 1997, with an overall return rate of 57.4%. Results are reported for all journals, with comparisons being made between journals edited in the Unites States and outside the Unites States, by journal impact factor, and by discipline. The findings suggest that editorial policies regarding prior electronic publication are in an early stage of development. Most journal editors do not have a formal policy regarding the evaluation of work previously published in electronic form, nor are they currently evaluating such a policy. Editors disagreed widely on the importance of the various factors that might affect their decision to consider a work previously published electronically. The form or type of prior electronic publication was an important variable. Although some editors currently have a fairly rigid and negative posture towards work previously published electronically, most are willing to consider certain forms of such work for publication in their journals. Probably the most significant results of the study were the many differences in practices among scholarly disciplines. The findings of this study reveal how the Internet and the World Wide Web are currently affecting manuscript consideration policies of scholarly journals at this early stage of Web and Internet publishing
    Language
    e
  10. Weiner, S.T.: Electronic journals, four part series : an introduction (1997) 0.04
    0.04437589 = sum of:
      0.0382946 = product of:
        0.1531784 = sum of:
          0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1531784 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.006081289 = product of:
        0.012162578 = sum of:
          0.012162578 = weight(_text_:e in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012162578 = score(doc=834,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.16503859 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    First in a series of 4 articles discussing the future of the e-journal considering such issues as pricing, implementation, distribution copyright and format from the perspectives of publiahers, librarians and editors. Lists articles providing an overview of what has been happening with e-journals over the last 2 years from the following titles: access methods to electronic journals via the Internet; the alarmists versus the equilibrists: re-examining the role of the serials professionals in the information ages; BH Blackwell, Readmore to develop electronic journal service; cheaper by the case; electronic chemistry journals: elemental concerns; electronic journals: trends in the WWW Internet access; electronic journals market and technology; electronics journbal update; CJTCS - Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science; Elsevier rolls out digital library; IT and the sciences; JAVELIN: an approach to the development of a new kind of electronic journal; projecting the electronic revolution while budgeting for the status quo; a theory of polar information; TULIP: participating in an experiment of electronic journal access - administrative challenges to ensure success; The University Licensing Program (TULIP); electronic journals in materials science; and the weekly journal of sciences goes electronic
    Language
    e
  11. Nobarany, S.; Booth, K.S.: Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2017) 0.04
    0.041805632 = sum of:
      0.0382946 = product of:
        0.1531784 = sum of:
          0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1531784 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0035110335 = product of:
        0.007022067 = sum of:
          0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007022067 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Design of peer-review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the concealment and transparency of information related to identities of the various stakeholders (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) involved in the peer-review process. Anonymity policies have been a subject of debate for several decades within scholarly communities. Because of widespread criticism of traditional peer-review processes, a variety of new peer-review processes have emerged that manage the trade-offs between disclosure and concealment of identities in different ways. Based on an analysis of policies and guidelines for authors and reviewers provided by publication venues, we developed a framework for understanding how disclosure and concealment of identities is managed. We discuss the appropriate role of information technology and computer support for the peer-review process within that framework.
    Language
    e
  12. Publish and don't be damned : some science journals that claim to peer review papers do not do so (2018) 0.04
    0.041805632 = sum of:
      0.0382946 = product of:
        0.1531784 = sum of:
          0.1531784 = weight(_text_:editors in 4333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1531784 = score(doc=4333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 4333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4333)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0035110335 = product of:
        0.007022067 = sum of:
          0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 4333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007022067 = score(doc=4333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4333)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Whether to get a promotion or merely a foot in the door, academics have long known that they must publish papers, typically the more the better. Tallying scholarly publications to evaluate their authors has been common since the invention of scientific journals in the 17th century. So, too, has the practice of journal editors asking independent, usually anonymous, experts to scrutinise manuscripts and reject those deemed flawed-a quality-control process now known as peer review. Of late, however, this habit of according importance to papers labelled as "peer reviewed" has become something of a gamble. A rising number of journals that claim to review submissions in this way do not bother to do so. Not coincidentally, this seems to be leading some academics to inflate their publication lists with papers that might not pass such scrutiny."
    Language
    e
  13. Doering, P.F.: ¬The hidden dangers of electronic publishing (1995) 0.04
    0.040584274 = product of:
      0.08116855 = sum of:
        0.08116855 = sum of:
          0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011703446 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
          0.0694651 = weight(_text_:22 in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694651 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 21:39:19
    Language
    e
  14. Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995) 0.04
    0.040584274 = product of:
      0.08116855 = sum of:
        0.08116855 = sum of:
          0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011703446 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
          0.0694651 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0694651 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
  15. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.04
    0.037148796 = product of:
      0.07429759 = sum of:
        0.07429759 = sum of:
          0.018725513 = weight(_text_:e in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018725513 = score(doc=3035,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.055572078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055572078 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
    Language
    e
  16. García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: ¬The principal-agent problem in peer review : an interactionist perspective on everyday use of biomedical information (2015) 0.03
    0.034838025 = sum of:
      0.031912163 = product of:
        0.12764865 = sum of:
          0.12764865 = weight(_text_:editors in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12764865 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.37085986 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0029258614 = product of:
        0.005851723 = sum of:
          0.005851723 = weight(_text_:e in 1638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005851723 = score(doc=1638,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1638, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1638)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In economics, the principal-agent problem is the difficulty in motivating one party (the agent), to act in the best interests of another (the principal) rather than in his own interests. We consider the example of a journal editor (the principal) wondering whether his or her reviewer (the agent) is recommending rejection of a manuscript because it does not have enough quality to be published or because the reviewer dislikes effort and he/she must work to acquire in-depth knowledge of the content of the manuscript. The reviewer's effort provides him or her with superior information about a manuscript's quality. If this information is not correctly communicated, the reviewer has more information when compared with the journal editor. This inherently leads to an encouragement of moral hazard, where the editor will not know whether the reviewer has done his or her job in accordance to the editor's interest. Prescriptions need to be given as to how the journal editor should control the reviewers to curb self-interest. Besides the associate editors monitoring the peer-review process, incentives can be employed to limit moral hazard on the part of the reviewer. Drawing on agency theory, we examine the incentives motivating the reviewers to expend effort to generate information about the quality of submissions. This model predicts that for reviewers early in their careers, promotion-based incentives may mean there is no need for within-job incentives, but also that within-job rewards for a referee's performance should depend on individual differences in ability and promotion opportunities.
    Language
    e
  17. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03
    0.03473255 = product of:
      0.0694651 = sum of:
        0.0694651 = product of:
          0.1389302 = sum of:
            0.1389302 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1389302 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051270977 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  18. Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998) 0.03
    0.034406506 = product of:
      0.06881301 = sum of:
        0.06881301 = sum of:
          0.013240937 = weight(_text_:e in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013240937 = score(doc=3620,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
          0.055572078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055572078 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Language
    e
  19. Hammerl, M.; Kempf, K.; Schäffler, H.: E-Books in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken : Versuch einer Bestandsaufnahme (2008) 0.03
    0.03347218 = product of:
      0.06694436 = sum of:
        0.06694436 = sum of:
          0.018318791 = weight(_text_:e in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018318791 = score(doc=1802,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.24857454 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.048625566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048625566 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag verfolgt das Ziel einer praxisorientierten Bestandsaufnahme der aktuellen Situation auf dem Markt kostenpflichtiger E-Books aus der Perspektive wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken. Ausgehend von den Erwartungen, die von Nutzer- und Bibliotheksseite an diese relativ neue Gattung elektronischer Medien gerichtet werden können, und dem den E-Books grundsätzlich unterstellten Potenzial wird der tatsächlich erreichte Stand näher beleuchtet. Untersucht werden dabei neben einer allgemeinen Markteinschätzung Aspekte wie gängige Zugriffsoptionen, Preis-und Geschäftsmodelle, Vertriebswege, Recherche- und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten oder auch Erschließungsfragen. Der Aufsatz mündet in einen exemplarischen Blick auf bisher gewonnene konkrete Erfahrungen mit E-Books an wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken sowie die Andeutung möglicher Entwicklungsperspektiven.
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:13:22
    Object
    E-Books
  20. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.03
    0.032467417 = product of:
      0.064934835 = sum of:
        0.064934835 = sum of:
          0.009362756 = weight(_text_:e in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009362756 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
          0.055572078 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055572078 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051270977 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22

Years

Languages

  • e 406
  • d 86
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 431
  • m 31
  • el 26
  • s 16
  • r 9
  • n 3
  • b 2
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications