Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.05 
    0.051875494 = product of:
  0.10375099 = sum of:
    0.06916096 = weight(_text_:fields in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06916096 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.21883413 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
    0.034590032 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034590032 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Xu, H.; Lancaster, F.W.: Redundancy and uniqueness of subject access points in online catalogs (1998) 0.05 
    0.05187072 = product of:
  0.20748287 = sum of:
    0.20748287 = weight(_text_:fields in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20748287 = score(doc=1788,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.65650237 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of an analysis of 205 randomly selected records from the OCLC OLUC, to test the assumption that online catalogues have greatly improved subject searching capabilities, over card catalogues, by making other fields in the records searchable as subject access points (SAPs). Results showed considerable overlap (duplication) among the SAPs provided by the title, subject heading and classification number fields. On average, little more than 4 unique, unduplicated access points were found per record. Where title and classification number fields do add some access points not provided by subject headings, the increase is less than many librarians might be expected. Suggests that OPACs might outperform catalogues more in precision than in recall by allowing greater discrimination in searching; terms from different fields may be combined; titles offer greater specifity; searches can be limited by date, language or other criteria
  3. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  4. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  5. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.03 
    0.025942523 = product of:
  0.10377009 = sum of:
    0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10377009 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  6. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.03 
    0.025942523 = product of:
  0.10377009 = sum of:
    0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10377009 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  7. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.03 
    0.025942523 = product of:
  0.10377009 = sum of:
    0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10377009 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  8. Stevens, N.D.: ¬The catalogs of the future : a speculative essay (1998) 0.03 
    0.02593536 = product of:
  0.10374144 = sum of:
    0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 4624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10374144 = score(doc=4624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 4624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4624)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The foundations of the card catalogue, catalogue use studies what can be conjectured about user needs suggest that future catalogues, as they are made possible throught the manipulations of computerized bibliographic records, ought not to take a single format. The concept of the main entry will no longer be valid at this point and multiple access points will be possible. Machine based systems will allow librarians to construct a series of catalogues to meet user needs. Proposes that there might be 3 catalogue levels of varying form and size to meet the needs of different levels of use and types of users: librarian's catalogue with full details; general user's catalogue, a location tool; and individual user's catalogue, full records in particular fields. Users could add their own material to their own catalogues and SDI via a message device would be possible
  9. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.02161877 = product of:
  0.08647508 = sum of:
    0.08647508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08647508 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  10. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.02 
    0.02161877 = product of:
  0.08647508 = sum of:
    0.08647508 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08647508 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02 
    0.02161877 = product of:
  0.08647508 = sum of:
    0.08647508 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08647508 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  12. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.02 
    0.0216128 = product of:
  0.0864512 = sum of:
    0.0864512 = weight(_text_:fields in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0864512 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.27354267 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
  13. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.02 
    0.018344136 = product of:
  0.073376544 = sum of:
    0.073376544 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073376544 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  14. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  15. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  16. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  20. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.02 
    0.015133139 = product of:
  0.060532555 = sum of:
    0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060532555 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 12
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • b 3
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes