-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.01
0.01079163 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = product of:
0.08633304 = sum of:
0.08633304 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08633304 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.0092499675 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = product of:
0.07399974 = sum of:
0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07399974 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.01
0.0092499675 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = product of:
0.07399974 = sum of:
0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07399974 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Resource Description Framework (RDF) (2004)
0.01
0.007914375 = product of:
0.0316575 = sum of:
0.0316575 = product of:
0.063315 = sum of:
0.063315 = weight(_text_:software in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063315 = score(doc=3063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Resource Description Framework (RDF) integrates a variety of applications from library catalogs and world-wide directories to syndication and aggregation of news, software, and content to personal collections of music, photos, and events using XML as an interchange syntax. The RDF specifications provide a lightweight ontology system to support the exchange of knowledge on the Web. The W3C Semantic Web Activity Statement explains W3C's plans for RDF, including the RDF Core WG, Web Ontology and the RDF Interest Group.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004)
0.01
0.007914375 = product of:
0.0316575 = sum of:
0.0316575 = product of:
0.063315 = sum of:
0.063315 = weight(_text_:software in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063315 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
-
Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2011 19:21:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.0061666453 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = product of:
0.049333163 = sum of:
0.049333163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049333163 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Miles, A.: SKOS: requirements for standardization (2006)
0.01
0.0059357807 = product of:
0.023743123 = sum of:
0.023743123 = product of:
0.047486246 = sum of:
0.047486246 = weight(_text_:software in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486246 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper poses three questions regarding the planned development of the Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) towards W3C Recommendation status. Firstly, what is the fundamental purpose and therefore scope of SKOS? Secondly, which key software components depend on SKOS, and how do they interact? Thirdly, what is the wider technological and social context in which SKOS is likely to be applied and how might this influence design goals? Some tentative conclusions are drawn and in particular it is suggested that the scope of SKOS be restricted to the formal representation of controlled structured vocabularies intended for use within retrieval applications. However, the main purpose of this paper is to articulate the assumptions that have motivated the design of SKOS, so that these may be reviewed prior to a rigorous standardization initiative.
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.00
0.0046249838 = product of:
0.018499935 = sum of:
0.018499935 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03699987 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015)
0.00
0.0046249838 = product of:
0.018499935 = sum of:
0.018499935 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03699987 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 7.2015 22:02:31
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.00
0.0038541534 = product of:
0.015416614 = sum of:
0.015416614 = product of:
0.030833228 = sum of:
0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030833228 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997)
0.00
0.0034625386 = product of:
0.013850154 = sum of:
0.013850154 = product of:
0.027700309 = sum of:
0.027700309 = weight(_text_:software in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027700309 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.15340936 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
-
Heery, R.; Wagner, H.: ¬A metadata registry for the Semantic Web (2002)
0.00
0.0034625386 = product of:
0.013850154 = sum of:
0.013850154 = product of:
0.027700309 = sum of:
0.027700309 = weight(_text_:software in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027700309 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.15340936 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- * Agencies maintaining directories of data elements in a domain area in accordance with ISO/IEC 11179 (This standard specifies good practice for data element definition as well as the registration process. Example implementations are the National Health Information Knowledgebase hosted by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Environmental Data Registry hosted by the US Environmental Protection Agency.); * The xml.org directory of the Extended Markup Language (XML) document specifications facilitating re-use of Document Type Definition (DTD), hosted by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS); * The MetaForm database of Dublin Core usage and mappings maintained at the State and University Library in Goettingen; * The Semantic Web Agreement Group Dictionary, a database of terms for the Semantic Web that can be referred to by humans and software agents; * LEXML, a multi-lingual and multi-jurisdictional RDF Dictionary for the legal world; * The SCHEMAS registry maintained by the European Commission funded SCHEMAS project, which indexes several metadata element sets as well as a large number of activity reports describing metadata related activities and initiatives. Metadata registries essentially provide an index of terms. Given the distributed nature of the Web, there are a number of ways this can be accomplished. For example, the registry could link to terms and definitions in schemas published by implementers and stored locally by the schema maintainer. Alternatively, the registry might harvest various metadata schemas from their maintainers. Registries provide 'added value' to users by indexing schemas relevant to a particular 'domain' or 'community of use' and by simplifying the navigation of terms by enabling multiple schemas to be accessed from one view. An important benefit of this approach is an increase in the reuse of existing terms, rather than users having to reinvent them. Merging schemas to one view leads to harmonization between applications and helps avoid duplication of effort. Additionally, the establishment of registries to index terms actively being used in local implementations facilitates the metadata standards activity by providing implementation experience transferable to the standards-making process.
