Search (226 results, page 1 of 12)

0.110025704 = product of:
  0.22005141 = sum of:
    0.22005141 = sum of:
      0.100288466 = weight(_text_:w in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100288466 = score(doc=4007,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
      0.119762935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.119762935 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.1999 20:22:06

0.08711834 = sum of:
  0.062046222 = product of:
    0.24818489 = sum of:
      0.24818489 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24818489 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44159594 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.025072116 = product of:
    0.050144233 = sum of:
      0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050144233 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.

0.061657883 = product of:
  0.12331577 = sum of:
    0.12331577 = sum of:
      0.06685898 = weight(_text_:w in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685898 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.056456786 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056456786 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht

0.061657883 = product of:
  0.12331577 = sum of:
    0.12331577 = sum of:
      0.06685898 = weight(_text_:w in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685898 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
      0.056456786 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056456786 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.5-22

Source

Libraries and Google. Eds.: Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen

0.058850884 = sum of:
  0.029600082 = product of:
    0.11840033 = sum of:
      0.11840033 = weight(_text_:authors in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11840033 = score(doc=352,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.029250802 = product of:
    0.058501605 = sum of:
      0.058501605 = weight(_text_:w in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058501605 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Librarians need to be the Google experts in their community since it enables librarians to be more competent in educating users. To keep up with the developments of Google the authors reviewed eleven Web sites and blogs and create a strategy for keeping up using these sites. Three are highly recommended for a keeping-up regimen. The authors also suggest that librarians either use search engine alerting services or RSS technology to deliver news feeds into a news aggregator in their keeping-up regimen.

Source

Libraries and Google. Eds.: Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen

0.05018122 = sum of:
  0.020930419 = product of:
    0.083721675 = sum of:
      0.083721675 = weight(_text_:authors in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083721675 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.029250802 = product of:
    0.058501605 = sum of:
      0.058501605 = weight(_text_:w in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058501605 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

External factors are forcing libraries to seriously evaluate and redefine their purpose within higher education. Libraries have identified themselves as gateways to information. Google, and other Internet search tools, have changed the need and importance of the gatekeeper role in libraries. The authors argue that libraries have a role that is broader than that of gatekeeper. It is necessary to move beyond our existing mental models and truly redefine our unique role based on the needs within the external environment. To develop this broader role, libraries must develop collaborative relationships and leverage existing tools and services.

Source

Libraries and Google. Eds.: Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen

0.047543347 = sum of:
  0.0299006 = product of:
    0.1196024 = sum of:
      0.1196024 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1196024 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017642746 = product of:
    0.03528549 = sum of:
      0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03528549 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.043537427 = sum of:
  0.025894681 = product of:
    0.103578724 = sum of:
      0.103578724 = weight(_text_:authors in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103578724 = score(doc=109,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017642746 = product of:
    0.03528549 = sum of:
      0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03528549 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This chapter shows that the wider use of Web search engines, reconsidering the theoretical and methodological frameworks to grasp new information practices. Beginning with an overview of the recent challenges implied by the dynamic nature of the Web, this chapter then traces the information behavior related concepts in order to present the different approaches from the user perspective. The authors pay special attention to the concept of "information practice" and other related concepts such as "use", "activity", and "behavior" largely used in the literature but not always strictly defined. The authors provide an overview of user-oriented studies that are meaningful to understand the different contexts of use of electronic information access systems, focusing on five approaches: the system-oriented approaches, the theories of information seeking, the cognitive and psychological approaches, the management science approaches, and the marketing approaches. Future directions of work are then shaped, including social searching and the ethical, cultural, and political dimensions of Web search engines. The authors conclude considering the importance of Critical theory to better understand the role of Web Search engines in our modern society.

Date

20. 4.2012 13:22:37

0.03911165 = sum of:
  0.01794036 = product of:
    0.07176144 = sum of:
      0.07176144 = weight(_text_:authors in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07176144 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021171294 = product of:
    0.04234259 = sum of:
      0.04234259 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04234259 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.

Date

20. 4.2012 13:19:22

0.038536176 = product of:
  0.07707235 = sum of:
    0.07707235 = sum of:
      0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04178686 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
      0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 5283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03528549 = score(doc=5283,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5283, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5283)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2006 16:59:13

0.03584373 = sum of:
  0.0149503 = product of:
    0.0598012 = sum of:
      0.0598012 = weight(_text_:authors in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0598012 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02089343 = product of:
    0.04178686 = sum of:
      0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04178686 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Search engines are essential tools for web users today. They rely on a large number of features to compute the rank of search results for each given query. The estimated reputation of pages is among the effective features available for search engine designers, probably being adopted by most current commercial search engines. Page reputation is estimated by analyzing the linkage relationships between pages. This information is used by link analysis algorithms as a query-independent feature, to be taken into account when computing the rank of the results. Unfortunately, several types of links found on the web may damage the estimated page reputation and thus cause a negative effect on the quality of search results. This work studies alternatives to reduce the negative impact of such noisy links. More specifically, the authors propose and evaluate new methods that deal with noisy links, considering scenarios where the reputation of pages is computed using the PageRank algorithm. They show, through experiments with real web content, that their methods achieve significant improvements when compared to previous solutions proposed in the literature.

0.035457328 = product of:
  0.070914656 = sum of:
    0.070914656 = product of:
      0.14182931 = sum of:
        0.14182931 = weight(_text_:w in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14182931 = score(doc=1622,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.71452606 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Libraries and Google. Eds.: Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen

0.03342949 = product of:
  0.06685898 = sum of:
    0.06685898 = product of:
      0.13371795 = sum of:
        0.13371795 = weight(_text_:w in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13371795 = score(doc=708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.67366165 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.030828942 = product of:
  0.061657883 = sum of:
    0.061657883 = sum of:
      0.03342949 = weight(_text_:w in 4953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03342949 = score(doc=4953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 4953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4953)
      0.028228393 = weight(_text_:22 in 4953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028228393 = score(doc=4953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4953)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Footnote

Rez. in: Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.192 vom 19.8.2006, S.ras01a/1 (W. Schmidt): Die Erfolgreiche: Wie die Suchmaschine wurde, was sie ist.

0.029940734 = product of:
  0.059881467 = sum of:
    0.059881467 = product of:
      0.119762935 = sum of:
        0.119762935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119762935 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7. 2.1996 22:38:41

Pages

22 S

0.029940734 = product of:
  0.059881467 = sum of:
    0.059881467 = product of:
      0.119762935 = sum of:
        0.119762935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119762935 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.1999 21:22:59

0.029250802 = product of:
  0.058501605 = sum of:
    0.058501605 = product of:
      0.11700321 = sum of:
        0.11700321 = weight(_text_:w in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11700321 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.028228393 = product of:
  0.056456786 = sum of:
    0.056456786 = product of:
      0.11291357 = sum of:
        0.11291357 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11291357 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27.11.2005 18:04:22

0.027506426 = product of:
  0.055012852 = sum of:
    0.055012852 = sum of:
      0.025072116 = weight(_text_:w in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025072116 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.12631156 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
      0.029940734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029940734 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
- Als eine regelrechte Sumpfblüte aus dem Szenario des «Bullshits» präsentiert sich der republikanische Präsidentschaftskandidat Donald Trump. Aber Künstlichkeit des Faktischen bedeutet nun gerade nicht Unverbindlichkeit. Dieser Fehlschluss stellt sich nicht nur für die Erkenntnistheorie als ruinös heraus, sondern vor allem auch für die Demokratie. Zur Erläuterung benütze ich drei politische Szenarien: jenes der Wahrheit, jenes der Macht und jenes des «Bullshits». Im Szenario der Wahrheit überprüfen wir eine Aussage, bis wir den robusten Konsens für einen Entscheid gefunden haben: Die Aussage ist wahr oder falsch, tertium non datur. Lügner werden überführt, wie US-Aussenminister Colin Powell, der 2003 in der Uno die Intervention im Irak mit falschen faktischen Behauptungen begründete. Dieser Makel haftet ihm bis heute an. Dies gerade auch - und das muss man ihm zugutehalten -, weil Powell das Szenario der Wahrheit anerkennt. George W. Bush und seine Kamarilla im Irakkrieg etablierten dagegen das Szenario der Macht.

0.025725782 = product of:
  0.051451564 = sum of:
    0.051451564 = sum of:
      0.02089343 = weight(_text_:w in 5938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02089343 = score(doc=5938,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.105259635 = fieldWeight in 5938, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5938)
      0.030558133 = weight(_text_:22 in 5938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030558133 = score(doc=5938,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05208721 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 5938, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5938)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Wer Google googelt, sieht zuallererst Google. Das klingt wie ein plattes Witzchen - ist aber schon das wesentliche Geheimnis des unheimlichen Erfolgs einer Suchmaschine, der es gelungen ist, binnen weniger Jahre das Internet, die Suche nach Informationen und die Werbewelt zu verändern und sich unentbehrlich zu machen. Googeln wurde buchstäblich zum Begriff. "Keine andere Marke hat je so schnell globale Anerkennung gefunden wie Google", schreiben David A. Vise, ein Reporter der "Washington Post", und sein Kollege Mark Malseed in ihrem Buch über den sagenhaften Aufstieg des Unternehmens, das Suchergebnisse in 35 Sprachen liefert. Allein in Deutschland nutzen heute über 22 Millionen Menschen die Suchmaschine mit den bunten Buchstaben regelmäßig - unter den Internet-Surfern hierzulande ein Marktanteil von 65 Prozent. Sie suchen nach Neuigkeiten über ihre Filmhelden, prüfen die Schreibweise von Fremdwörtern oder forschen wie Detektive nach Wissenswertem über die Frau oder den Mann, mit dem sie sich abends treffen werden - zum Rendezvous oder Geschäftsessen. Längst gelten in manchen Kreisen Menschen als Langweiler, über die selbst Google nichts weiß. Wie dieser Erfolg möglich war, beschreiben Vise und Malseed auf rund 300 Seiten. Man kann es mit dem Dichter Victor Hugo (1802-1885) aber auch kürzer sagen: "Nichts ist so mächtig wie eine Idee, deren Zeit gekommen ist." Noch mächtiger freilich ist eine Idee, die von der Konkurrenz übernommen wird - in totaler Verkennung der Bedürfnisse von Internet-Nutzern. Eine solche Idee brachte 1997 Google hervor - und hat längst Wirtschafts- und Kulturgeschichte geschrieben. Der zentrale Gedanke der beiden damals 22-jährigen Google-Gründer Larry Page und Sergey Brin ist simpel: Wenn die Lawine der im Internet abrufbaren Informationen weiter derart anschwillt, dann brauchen die Nutzer des weltweiten Netzes einen exzellenten Suchhund. Nicht umsonst ist der Name der Suchmaschine abgeleitet von dem Wort Googol, womit in der Mathematik eine absurd große Zahl mit hundert Nullen bezeichnet wird - eine Anspielung auf die unermessliche und längst unüberschaubare Weite des Internets.

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22