Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.02
    0.02432098 = product of:
      0.060802452 = sum of:
        0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027104476 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  2. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.02
    0.01809748 = product of:
      0.045243703 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.016460039 = product of:
          0.032920077 = sum of:
            0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032920077 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  3. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.02
    0.017425805 = product of:
      0.043564513 = sum of:
        0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027104476 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
        0.016460039 = product of:
          0.032920077 = sum of:
            0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032920077 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  4. Snow, B.: ¬The Internet's hidden content and how to find it (2000) 0.01
    0.013479191 = product of:
      0.067395955 = sum of:
        0.067395955 = weight(_text_:b in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067395955 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  5. Verlic, Z.; Repinc, U.: Informacijsko vedenje z iskalno strategijo (2000) 0.01
    0.013432376 = product of:
      0.06716188 = sum of:
        0.06716188 = weight(_text_:u in 7863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06716188 = score(doc=7863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 7863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7863)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  6. Mandala, R.; Tokunaga, T.; Tanaka, H.: Query expansion using heterogeneous thesauri (2000) 0.01
    0.011513465 = product of:
      0.057567324 = sum of:
        0.057567324 = weight(_text_:u in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057567324 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Fourie, I.: ¬A theoretical model for studying Web information seeking / searching behaviour (2003) 0.01
    0.009594555 = product of:
      0.047972776 = sum of:
        0.047972776 = weight(_text_:u in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047972776 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  8. Kules, B.; Shneiderman, B.: Users can change their web search tactics : design guidelines for categorized overviews (2008) 0.01
    0.0079426905 = product of:
      0.03971345 = sum of:
        0.03971345 = weight(_text_:b in 2044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03971345 = score(doc=2044,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 2044, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2044)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Kim, K.-S.; Allen, B.: Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior (2002) 0.01
    0.007862861 = product of:
      0.039314307 = sum of:
        0.039314307 = weight(_text_:b in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039314307 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01
    0.007681352 = product of:
      0.03840676 = sum of:
        0.03840676 = product of:
          0.07681352 = sum of:
            0.07681352 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07681352 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04049623 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  11. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and human individual differences : cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.0067395954 = product of:
      0.033697978 = sum of:
        0.033697978 = weight(_text_:b in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697978 = score(doc=3475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The research reported here was an exploratory study that sought to discover the effects of human individual differences an Web search strategy. These differences consisted of (a) study approaches, (b) cognitive and demographic features, and (c) perceptions of and preferred approaches to Web-based information seeking. Sixtyeight master's students used AItaVista to search for information an three assigned search topics graded in terms of complexity. Five hundred seven search queries were factor analyzed to identify relationships between the individual difference variables and Boolean and best-match search strategies. A number of consistent patterns of relationship were found. As task complexity increased, a number of strategic shifts were also observed an the part of searchers possessing particular combinations of characteristics. A second article (published in this issue of JASIST; Ford, Miller, & Moss, 2005) presents a combined analyses of the data including a series of regression analyses.
  12. Lee, H.-L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword : two cultural perspectives (2006) 0.01
    0.006716188 = product of:
      0.03358094 = sum of:
        0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03358094 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  13. Stefl-Mabry, J.: ¬The reality of media preferences : do professional groups vary in awareness? (2005) 0.01
    0.006388586 = product of:
      0.03194293 = sum of:
        0.03194293 = weight(_text_:j in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03194293 = score(doc=4574,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study is based an earlier research by the author that employed social judgment analysis (SJA; J. SteflMabry, 2001, 2003) to identify the information judgment preferences held by professional groups. This study explores the extent to which individuals, professional groups, and subgroups are self-aware of their judgment profiles. Three specialized groups of professionals-law enforcement, medicine, and education-were chosen to determine if preference profiles cluster around professions or around demographic and other background variables. As the proliferation of data continues to increase, the need to understand users' media preference and selection decisions is of tremendous value to every industry, governmental agency, and institution of learning. In 1966, H. Menzel first raised concern about the reliability of users' to self-assess, and scientists continue to explore the issue of competency in human judgment. To understand the reliability of users' self-assessment regarding media preferences, this study examines the extent to which individuals and groups are self-aware of the empirical judgment profiles they employ in evaluating information source scenarios. This investigation explores the congruence of three groups of professionals' self-reported media preferences as compared to their empirical judgment values, as defined by social judgment analysis.
  14. Pomerantz, J.: ¬A linguistic analysis of question taxonomies (2005) 0.01
    0.006324378 = product of:
      0.03162189 = sum of:
        0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03162189 = score(doc=3465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Heinström, J.: Broad exploration or precise specificity : two basic information seeking patterns among students (2006) 0.01
    0.006324378 = product of:
      0.03162189 = sum of:
        0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03162189 = score(doc=6004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Johnson, J.D.: On contexts of information seeking (2003) 0.01
    0.0057567325 = product of:
      0.028783662 = sum of:
        0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028783662 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  17. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.01
    0.00561633 = product of:
      0.02808165 = sum of:
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=4915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  18. Hupfer, M.E.; Detlor, B.: Gender and Web information seeking : a self-concept orientation model (2006) 0.01
    0.00561633 = product of:
      0.02808165 = sum of:
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 5119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=5119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5119)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Einsporn, N.: Fachinformationen im WWW (2006) 0.01
    0.00561633 = product of:
      0.02808165 = sum of:
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 6044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=6044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 6044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6044)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Mittels professioneller Suchtechniken lässt sich die Recherche im WWW wesentlich schneller und zuverlässiger gestalten. Selbst eine universelle Suchmaschine, wie Google, erlaubt mittels spezieller Suchfunktionen qualifizierte Recherchen über den Freitext hinaus. Von besonderer Bedeutung sind hier die Selektion nach Domainnamen und die Einbeziehung der URL. In Kombination mit dem Verständnis der Ranking-Techniken, z. B. der Prioritäten der im HTML-Quelltext verankerten inhaltlichen Meta-Informationen (Title-Tag, Meta-Tags Keywords, Description) gegenüber dem Standardverfahren (Google PageRank) lässt sich die Recherche auf professionelle Informationsangebote ausrichten. Eine weitere Qualifizierung lässt sich durch geschickten Einsatz der Phrasensuche erreichen. In jedem Fall setzt eine erfolgreiche Recherche, auch bei scheinbar einfachen Benennungen und Zusammenhängen eine intellektuelle Recherchevorbereitung voraus - bei der zunächst das Thema strukturiert und dann eine Vorstellung über die möglichen Zusammenhänge entwickelt wird, in der die Zielinformation im WWW zu finden sein könnte. Soweit die Möglichkeit besteht, sollte bei anspruchsvollen technischwissenschaftlichen Themen der WWW-Suche eine Recherche in professionellen Literaturdatenbanken vorausgehen. Diese haben den Vorzug, dass eine transparente und sorgfältig selektierte Quellenbasis vorliegt und durch Suche mit kontrolliertem Wortschatz die typischen Unschärfen einer Freitextrecherche (unerwünschte Zusammenhänge, Synonyme, Homonyme, Schreibvarianten usw.) umgangen werden können. Die FIZ-Technik-Inform GmbH bietet kostenpflichtige Weiterbildungsveranstaltungen auch zur WWW-Recherche an.
  20. Wacholder, N.; Liu, L.: User preference : a measure of query-term quality (2006) 0.01
    0.00561633 = product of:
      0.02808165 = sum of:
        0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 19) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02808165 = score(doc=19,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049623 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 19, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=19)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of this research is to understand what characteristics, if any, lead users engaged in interactive information seeking to prefer certain sets of query terms. Underlying this work is the assumption that query terms that information seekers prefer induce a kind of cognitive efficiency: They require less mental effort to process and therefore reduce the energy required in the interactive information-seeking process. Conceptually, this work applies insights from linguistics and cognitive science to the study of query-term quality. We report on an experiment in which we compare user preference for three sets of terms; one had been preconstructed by a human indexer, and two were identified automatically. Twenty-four participants used a merged list of all terms to answer a carefully created set of questions. By design, the interface constrained users to access the text exclusively via the displayed list of query terms. We found that participants displayed a preference for the human-constructed set of terms eight times greater than the preference for either set of automatically identified terms. We speculate about reasons for this strong preference and discuss the implications for information access. The primary contributions of this research are (a) explication of the concept of user preference as a measure of queryterm quality and (b) identification of a replicable procedure for measuring preference for sets of query terms created by different methods, whether human or automatic. All other factors being equal, query terms that users prefer clearly are the best choice for real-world information-access systems.