Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.04
    0.038632046 = sum of:
      0.017720366 = product of:
        0.07088146 = sum of:
          0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07088146 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02091168 = product of:
        0.04182336 = sum of:
          0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04182336 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on an experimental study on the differences between spoken and written queries. A set of written and spontaneous spoken queries are generated by users from written topics. These two sets of queries are compared in qualitative terms and in terms of their retrieval effectiveness. Written and spoken queries are compared in terms of length, duration, and part of speech. In addition, assuming perfect transcription of the spoken queries, written and spoken queries are compared in terms of their aptitude to describe relevant documents. The retrieval effectiveness of spoken and written queries is compared using three different information retrieval models. The results show that using speech to formulate one's information need provides a way to express it more naturally and encourages the formulation of longer queries. Despite that, longer spoken queries do not seem to significantly improve retrieval effectiveness compared with written queries.
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  2. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.027882243 = product of:
      0.055764485 = sum of:
        0.055764485 = product of:
          0.11152897 = sum of:
            0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11152897 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  3. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.03
    0.02697864 = product of:
      0.05395728 = sum of:
        0.05395728 = product of:
          0.10791456 = sum of:
            0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10791456 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.024396962 = product of:
      0.048793923 = sum of:
        0.048793923 = product of:
          0.097587846 = sum of:
            0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097587846 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  5. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024396962 = product of:
      0.048793923 = sum of:
        0.048793923 = product of:
          0.097587846 = sum of:
            0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097587846 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  6. Cothey, V.: ¬A longitudinal study of World Wide Web users' information-searching behavior (2002) 0.02
    0.023606312 = product of:
      0.047212623 = sum of:
        0.047212623 = product of:
          0.094425246 = sum of:
            0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094425246 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017426401 = product of:
      0.034852803 = sum of:
        0.034852803 = product of:
          0.069705606 = sum of:
            0.069705606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069705606 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  8. Hollink, V.; Tsikrika, T.; Vries, A.P. de: Semantic search log analysis : a method and a study on professional image search (2011) 0.02
    0.016861651 = product of:
      0.033723302 = sum of:
        0.033723302 = product of:
          0.067446604 = sum of:
            0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067446604 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Granikov, V.; El Sherif, R.; Bouthillier, F.; Pluye, P.: Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking : a mixed studies review with a framework synthesis (2022) 0.02
    0.016861651 = product of:
      0.033723302 = sum of:
        0.033723302 = product of:
          0.067446604 = sum of:
            0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067446604 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Shah, C.; Marchionini, G.: Awareness in collaborative information seeking (2010) 0.01
    0.012530192 = product of:
      0.025060384 = sum of:
        0.025060384 = product of:
          0.100241534 = sum of:
            0.100241534 = weight(_text_:authors in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.100241534 = score(doc=4082,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Support for explicit collaboration in information-seeking activities is increasingly recognized as a desideratum for search systems. Several tools have emerged recently that help groups of people with the same information-seeking goals to work together. Many issues for these collaborative information-seeking (CIS) environments remain understudied. The authors identified awareness as one of these issues in CIS, and they presented a user study that involved 42 pairs of participants, who worked in collaboration over 2 sessions with 3 instances of the authors' CIS system for exploratory search. They showed that while having awareness of personal actions and history is important for exploratory search tasks spanning multiple sessions, support for group awareness is even more significant for effective collaboration. In addition, they showed that support for such group awareness can be provided without compromising usability or introducing additional load on the users.
  11. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
  12. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  13. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  14. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  15. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  16. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  17. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01
    0.01045584 = product of:
      0.02091168 = sum of:
        0.02091168 = product of:
          0.04182336 = sum of:
            0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182336 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  18. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.01
    0.010441827 = product of:
      0.020883653 = sum of:
        0.020883653 = product of:
          0.08353461 = sum of:
            0.08353461 = weight(_text_:authors in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08353461 = score(doc=4915,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  19. Pharo, N.; Järvelin, K.: "Irrational" searchers and IR-rational researchers (2006) 0.01
    0.008860183 = product of:
      0.017720366 = sum of:
        0.017720366 = product of:
          0.07088146 = sum of:
            0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 4922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07088146 = score(doc=4922,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4922, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4922)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article the authors look at the prescriptions advocated by Web search textbooks in the light of a selection of empirical data of real Web information search processes. They use the strategy of disjointed incrementalism, which is a theoretical foundation from decision making, to focus an how people face complex problems, and claim that such problem solving can be compared to the tasks searchers perform when interacting with the Web. The findings suggest that textbooks an Web searching should take into account that searchers only tend to take a certain number of sources into consideration, that the searchers adjust their goals and objectives during searching, and that searchers reconsider the usefulness of sources at different stages of their work tasks as well as their search tasks.
  20. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.01
    0.008860183 = product of:
      0.017720366 = sum of:
        0.017720366 = product of:
          0.07088146 = sum of:
            0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07088146 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ellis, et alia, now provide part five of their study on mediated searching which is treated separately here because of the presence of additional authors. The data source remains cases collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K. but the focus here is on seeker/intermediary interaction utilizing the Saracevic triadic IR model, and the method is the analysis of discourse. While the pre-search interview stressed problem definition, interaction during the search in terms of relevance and magnitude continued to develop the problem statement. The user and intermediary focused on search tactics, review and relevance, while the intermediary interaction with the system was comprised of terminology and answers. The interaction clearly affected the search process. Users and intermediaries considered the process effective and users felt the intermediary increased their overall satisfaction.

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • m 1
  • More… Less…