Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Still, J.: ¬A comparison of online search strategy formation as presented in British and American textbooks (1996) 0.03
    0.032632396 = product of:
      0.06526479 = sum of:
        0.06526479 = product of:
          0.13052958 = sum of:
            0.13052958 = weight(_text_:word in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13052958 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.46344328 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    UK and USA textbooks present keyword and controlled vocabulary searching in different ways, and put differing emphasis on the use of variant spellings and word variations. This reflects previous research on the way searchers in the 2 countries prepare online search strategies. Differences may reflect occupational trends, cultural behaviour, or awareness of a greater world view
  2. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.029111583 = product of:
      0.058223166 = sum of:
        0.058223166 = product of:
          0.11644633 = sum of:
            0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11644633 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  3. Wang, P.; Berry, M.W.; Yang, Y.: Mining longitudinal Web queries : trends and patterns (2003) 0.03
    0.028553344 = product of:
      0.05710669 = sum of:
        0.05710669 = product of:
          0.11421338 = sum of:
            0.11421338 = weight(_text_:word in 6561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11421338 = score(doc=6561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.40551287 = fieldWeight in 6561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This project analyzed 541,920 user queries submitted to and executed in an academic Website during a four-year period (May 1997 to May 2001) using a relational database. The purpose of the study is three-fold: (1) to understand Web users' query behavior; (2) to identify problems encountered by these Web users; (3) to develop appropriate techniques for optimization of query analysis and mining. The linguistic analyses focus an query structures, lexicon, and word associations using statistical measures such as Zipf distribution and mutual information. A data model with finest granularity is used for data storage and iterative analyses. Patterns and trends of querying behavior are identified and compared with previous studies.
  4. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  5. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  6. Boynton, J.: Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE : developing an objective approach to search strategy design (1998) 0.02
    0.024474295 = product of:
      0.04894859 = sum of:
        0.04894859 = product of:
          0.09789718 = sum of:
            0.09789718 = weight(_text_:word in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09789718 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.34758246 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Systematic reviews are becoming increasingly important for health care professionals seeking to provide evidence based health care. In the past, systematic reviews have been difficult to identify among the mass of literature labelled 'reviews'. Reports results of a study to design search strategies based on a more objective approach to strategy construction. MEDLINE was chosen as the database and word frequencies in the titles, abstracts and subject keywords of a collection of systematic reviews of the effective health care interventions were analyzed to derive a highly sensitive search strategy. 'Sensitivity' was used in preference to the usual term 'recall' as one of the measures (in addition to the usual 'precision'). The proposed strategy was found to offer 98% sensitivity in retrieving systematic reviews, while retaining a low but acceptable level of precision (20%). Reports results using other strategies with other levels of sensitivity and precision. Concludes that it is possible to use frequency analysis to generate highly sensitive strategies when retrieving systematic reviews
  7. Stefl-Mabry, J.: ¬A social judgment analysis of information source preference profiles : An exploratory study to empirically represent media selection patterns (2003) 0.02
    0.020395245 = product of:
      0.04079049 = sum of:
        0.04079049 = product of:
          0.08158098 = sum of:
            0.08158098 = weight(_text_:word in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08158098 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.28965205 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To better understand how individuals and groups derive satisfaction from information, it is important to identify the information source preferences they apply in information seeking and decision making. Four informal propositions drove the structure and underlying logic of this study, forming a preliminary outline of a theory of information source preference profiles and their influence an information satisfaction. This study employed Social Judgment Analysis (SJA) to identify the information judgment preferences held by professional groups for six selected information sources: word of mouth, expert oral advice, Internet, print news, nonfiction books, and radio/television news. The research was designed as an hypotheses-generating exploratory study employing a purposive sample (n = 90) and generated four empirically supported, testable hypotheses about user satisfaction with information sources. The SJA judgment functions revealed the influences of volume and polarity (i.e., positive versus negative information) an information satisfaction. By advancing the understanding of how information source preferences can be identified empirically and their influence an information satisfaction, this research reflects a first, small step toward understanding "satisficing." Satisficing behaviors result in early termination of information search processes when individuals, facing incomplete information, are sufficiently satisfied to assume risks and execute decisions.
  8. Madden, A.D.; Ford, N.J.; Miller, D.; Levy, P.: Children's use of the internet for information-seeking : what strategies do they use, and what factors affect their performance? (2006) 0.02
    0.020395245 = product of:
      0.04079049 = sum of:
        0.04079049 = product of:
          0.08158098 = sum of:
            0.08158098 = weight(_text_:word in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08158098 = score(doc=615,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.28965205 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - A common criticism of research into information seeking on the internet is that information seekers are restricted by the demands of the researcher. Another criticism is that the search topics, are often imposed by the researcher, and; particularly when working with children, domain knowledge could be as important as information-seeking skills. The research reported here attempts to address both these problems. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 15 children, aged 11 to 16, were each set three "think aloud" internet searches. In the first, they were asked to recall the last time they had sought information on the internet, and to repeat the search. For the second, they were given a word, asked to interpret it, then asked to search for their interpretation. For the third, they were asked to recall the last time they had been unsuccessful in a search, and to repeat the search. While performing each task, the children were encouraged to explain their actions. Findings - The paper finds that the factors that determined a child's ability to search successfully appeared to be: the amount of experience the child had of using the internet; the amount of guidance, both from adults and from peers; and the child's ability to explore the virtual environment, and to use the tools available for so doing. Originality/value - Many of the searches performed by participants in this paper were not related to schoolwork, and so some of the search approaches differed from those taught by teachers. Instead, they evolved through exploration and exchange of ideas. Further studies of this sort could provide insights of value to designers of web environments.
  9. Grau, B.: Finding answers to questions, in text collections or Web, in open domain or specialty domains (2012) 0.02
    0.020395245 = product of:
      0.04079049 = sum of:
        0.04079049 = product of:
          0.08158098 = sum of:
            0.08158098 = weight(_text_:word in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08158098 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.28965205 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter is dedicated to factual question answering, i.e., extracting precise and exact answers to question given in natural language from texts. A question in natural language gives more information than a bag of word query (i.e., a query made of a list of words), and provides clues for finding precise answers. The author first focuses on the presentation of the underlying problems mainly due to the existence of linguistic variations between questions and their answerable pieces of texts for selecting relevant passages and extracting reliable answers. The author first presents how to answer factual question in open domain. The author also presents answering questions in specialty domain as it requires dealing with semi-structured knowledge and specialized terminologies, and can lead to different applications, as information management in corporations for example. Searching answers on the Web constitutes another application frame and introduces specificities linked to Web redundancy or collaborative usage. Besides, the Web is also multilingual, and a challenging problem consists in searching answers in target language documents other than the source language of the question. For all these topics, this chapter presents main approaches and the remaining problems.
  10. Liu, Z.; Jansen, B.J.: ASK: A taxonomy of accuracy, social, and knowledge information seeking posts in social question and answering (2017) 0.02
    0.020395245 = product of:
      0.04079049 = sum of:
        0.04079049 = product of:
          0.08158098 = sum of:
            0.08158098 = weight(_text_:word in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08158098 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.28965205 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Many people turn to their social networks to find information through the practice of question and answering. We believe it is necessary to use different answering strategies based on the type of questions to accommodate the different information needs. In this research, we propose the ASK taxonomy that categorizes questions posted on social networking sites into three types according to the nature of the questioner's inquiry of accuracy, social, or knowledge. To automatically decide which answering strategy to use, we develop a predictive model based on ASK question types using question features from the perspectives of lexical, topical, contextual, and syntactic as well as answer features. By applying the classifier on an annotated data set, we present a comprehensive analysis to compare questions in terms of their word usage, topical interests, temporal and spatial restrictions, syntactic structure, and response characteristics. Our research results show that the three types of questions exhibited different characteristics in the way they are asked. Our automatic classification algorithm achieves an 83% correct labeling result, showing the value of the ASK taxonomy for the design of social question and answering systems.
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.018194739 = product of:
      0.036389478 = sum of:
        0.036389478 = product of:
          0.072778955 = sum of:
            0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072778955 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  12. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
  13. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  14. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  15. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  16. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  17. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  18. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  19. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  20. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.009097369 = product of:
      0.018194739 = sum of:
        0.018194739 = product of:
          0.036389478 = sum of:
            0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036389478 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52