Search (153 results, page 1 of 8)

0.040584274 = product of:
  0.08116855 = sum of:
    0.08116855 = sum of:
      0.011703446 = weight(_text_:e in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011703446 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.0694651 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0694651 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Language

e

0.037322458 = product of:
  0.074644916 = sum of:
    0.074644916 = sum of:
      0.015701821 = weight(_text_:e in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015701821 = score(doc=3355,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.2130639 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.058943093 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058943093 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

JZN (E)
TVV (E)

Date

22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56

GHBS

JZN (E)
TVV (E)

Language

e

0.034285955 = sum of:
  0.018052246 = product of:
    0.072208986 = sum of:
      0.072208986 = weight(_text_:editors in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.072208986 = score(doc=1789,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.34419647 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.20979002 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016233709 = sum of:
    0.002340689 = weight(_text_:e in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002340689 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051270977 = queryNorm
        0.031761687 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
    0.013893019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013893019 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051270977 = queryNorm
        0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)

Date

23. 3.2008 19:10:22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.9, S.905-906 (C.A. Badurek): "Visual approaches for knowledge discovery in very large databases are a prime research need for information scientists focused an extracting meaningful information from the ever growing stores of data from a variety of domains, including business, the geosciences, and satellite and medical imagery. This work presents a summary of research efforts in the fields of data mining, knowledge discovery, and data visualization with the goal of aiding the integration of research approaches and techniques from these major fields. The editors, leading computer scientists from academia and industry, present a collection of 32 papers from contributors who are incorporating visualization and data mining techniques through academic research as well application development in industry and government agencies. Information Visualization focuses upon techniques to enhance the natural abilities of humans to visually understand data, in particular, large-scale data sets. It is primarily concerned with developing interactive graphical representations to enable users to more intuitively make sense of multidimensional data as part of the data exploration process. It includes research from computer science, psychology, human-computer interaction, statistics, and information science. Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) most often refers to the process of mining databases for previously unknown patterns and trends in data. Data mining refers to the particular computational methods or algorithms used in this process. The data mining research field is most related to computational advances in database theory, artificial intelligence and machine learning. This work compiles research summaries from these main research areas in order to provide "a reference work containing the collection of thoughts and ideas of noted researchers from the fields of data mining and data visualization" (p. 8). It addresses these areas in three main sections: the first an data visualization, the second an KDD and model visualization, and the last an using visualization in the knowledge discovery process. The seven chapters of Part One focus upon methodologies and successful techniques from the field of Data Visualization. Hoffman and Grinstein (Chapter 2) give a particularly good overview of the field of data visualization and its potential application to data mining. An introduction to the terminology of data visualization, relation to perceptual and cognitive science, and discussion of the major visualization display techniques are presented. Discussion and illustration explain the usefulness and proper context of such data visualization techniques as scatter plots, 2D and 3D isosurfaces, glyphs, parallel coordinates, and radial coordinate visualizations. Remaining chapters present the need for standardization of visualization methods, discussion of user requirements in the development of tools, and examples of using information visualization in addressing research problems.
In 13 chapters, Part Two provides an introduction to KDD, an overview of data mining techniques, and examples of the usefulness of data model visualizations. The importance of visualization throughout the KDD process is stressed in many of the chapters. In particular, the need for measures of visualization effectiveness, benchmarking for identifying best practices, and the use of standardized sample data sets is convincingly presented. Many of the important data mining approaches are discussed in this complementary context. Cluster and outlier detection, classification techniques, and rule discovery algorithms are presented as the basic techniques common to the KDD process. The potential effectiveness of using visualization in the data modeling process are illustrated in chapters focused an using visualization for helping users understand the KDD process, ask questions and form hypotheses about their data, and evaluate the accuracy and veracity of their results. The 11 chapters of Part Three provide an overview of the KDD process and successful approaches to integrating KDD, data mining, and visualization in complementary domains. Rhodes (Chapter 21) begins this section with an excellent overview of the relation between the KDD process and data mining techniques. He states that the "primary goals of data mining are to describe the existing data and to predict the behavior or characteristics of future data of the same type" (p. 281). These goals are met by data mining tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, summarization, dependency modeling, and change or deviation detection. Subsequent chapters demonstrate how visualization can aid users in the interactive process of knowledge discovery by graphically representing the results from these iterative tasks. Finally, examples of the usefulness of integrating visualization and data mining tools in the domain of business, imagery and text mining, and massive data sets are provided. This text concludes with a thorough and useful 17-page index and lengthy yet integrating 17-page summary of the academic and industrial backgrounds of the contributing authors. A 16-page set of color inserts provide a better representation of the visualizations discussed, and a URL provided suggests that readers may view all the book's figures in color on-line, although as of this submission date it only provides access to a summary of the book and its contents. The overall contribution of this work is its focus an bridging two distinct areas of research, making it a valuable addition to the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Database Management Systems. The editors of this text have met their main goal of providing the first textbook integrating knowledge discovery, data mining, and visualization. Although it contributes greatly to our under- standing of the development and current state of the field, a major weakness of this text is that there is no concluding chapter to discuss the contributions of the sum of these contributed papers or give direction to possible future areas of research. "Integration of expertise between two different disciplines is a difficult process of communication and reeducation. Integrating data mining and visualization is particularly complex because each of these fields in itself must draw an a wide range of research experience" (p. 300). Although this work contributes to the crossdisciplinary communication needed to advance visualization in KDD, a more formal call for an interdisciplinary research agenda in a concluding chapter would have provided a more satisfying conclusion to a very good introductory text.

Language

e

0.025804881 = product of:
  0.051609762 = sum of:
    0.051609762 = sum of:
      0.009930703 = weight(_text_:e in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009930703 = score(doc=1781,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
      0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04167906 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

JZN (E)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:35:21

GHBS

JZN (E)

0.024350563 = product of:
  0.048701126 = sum of:
    0.048701126 = sum of:
      0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007022067 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
      0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04167906 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

Language

e

0.024350563 = product of:
  0.048701126 = sum of:
    0.048701126 = sum of:
      0.007022067 = weight(_text_:e in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007022067 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
      0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04167906 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2010 19:36:46

Language

e

0.022434015 = product of:
  0.04486803 = sum of:
    0.04486803 = sum of:
      0.010135481 = weight(_text_:e in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010135481 = score(doc=3070,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03473255 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Language

e

0.020292137 = product of:
  0.040584274 = sum of:
    0.040584274 = sum of:
      0.005851723 = weight(_text_:e in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005851723 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03473255 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:29:25

Language

e

0.020292137 = product of:
  0.040584274 = sum of:
    0.040584274 = sum of:
      0.005851723 = weight(_text_:e in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005851723 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03473255 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2006 16:11:05

Language

e

0.020292137 = product of:
  0.040584274 = sum of:
    0.040584274 = sum of:
      0.005851723 = weight(_text_:e in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005851723 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03473255 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

9.12.2018 16:22:25

Language

e

0.020292137 = product of:
  0.040584274 = sum of:
    0.040584274 = sum of:
      0.005851723 = weight(_text_:e in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005851723 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
      0.03473255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03473255 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

21.12.2018 17:22:13

Language

e

0.017366275 = product of:
  0.03473255 = sum of:
    0.03473255 = product of:
      0.0694651 = sum of:
        0.0694651 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0694651 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

0.017203253 = product of:
  0.034406506 = sum of:
    0.034406506 = sum of:
      0.0066204686 = weight(_text_:e in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0066204686 = score(doc=1444,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
      0.027786039 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027786039 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Acquiring knowledge in any field involves information retrieval, i.e. searching the available documents to identify answers to the queries concerning the selected objects. Knowing the keywords which are names of the objects will enable situating the user's query in the information space organized as a thesaurus or faceted classification. Objectives: Identification the areas in the information space which correspond to gaps in the user's personal knowledge or in the domain knowledge might become useful in theory or practice. The aim of this paper is to present a realistic information-space model of a self-authored full-text document on information culture, indexed by the author of this article. Methodology: Having established the relations between the terms, particular modules (sets of terms connected by relations used in facet classification) are situated on a plain, similarly to a communication map. Conclusions drawn from the "journey" on the map, which is a visualization of the knowledge contained in the analysed document, are the crucial part of this paper. Results: The direct result of the research is the created model of information space visualization of a given document (book, article, website). The proposed procedure can practically be used as a new form of representation in order to map the contents of academic books and articles, beside the traditional index form, especially as an e-book auxiliary tool. In teaching, visualization of the information space of a document can be used to help students understand the issues of: classification, categorization and representation of new knowledge emerging in human mind.

Language

e

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.016233709 = product of:
  0.032467417 = sum of:
    0.032467417 = sum of:
      0.004681378 = weight(_text_:e in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004681378 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
      0.027786039 = weight(_text_:22 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027786039 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051270977 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

e

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.0121563915 = product of:
  0.024312783 = sum of:
    0.024312783 = product of:
      0.048625566 = sum of:
        0.048625566 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048625566 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 1.2007 18:22:41

0.010419765 = product of:
  0.02083953 = sum of:
    0.02083953 = product of:
      0.04167906 = sum of:
        0.04167906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04167906 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 2.2015 9:22:39

0.0052098823 = product of:
  0.010419765 = sum of:
    0.010419765 = product of:
      0.02083953 = sum of:
        0.02083953 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02083953 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17954223 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

0.004096206 = product of:
  0.008192412 = sum of:
    0.008192412 = product of:
      0.016384823 = sum of:
        0.016384823 = weight(_text_:e in 3475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016384823 = score(doc=3475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

e

0.004096206 = product of:
  0.008192412 = sum of:
    0.008192412 = product of:
      0.016384823 = sum of:
        0.016384823 = weight(_text_:e in 7711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016384823 = score(doc=7711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 7711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

e

0.004096206 = product of:
  0.008192412 = sum of:
    0.008192412 = product of:
      0.016384823 = sum of:
        0.016384823 = weight(_text_:e in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016384823 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07369536 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051270977 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

e