-
Jansen, L.: Four rules for classifying social entities (2014)
0.03
0.030403543 = product of:
0.091210626 = sum of:
0.06776674 = product of:
0.13553348 = sum of:
0.13553348 = weight(_text_:searle in 3409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13553348 = score(doc=3409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30824864 = queryWeight, product of:
7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.4396888 = fieldWeight in 3409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3409)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 3409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=3409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3409)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Many top-level ontologies like Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) have been developed as a framework for ontologies in the natural sciences. The aim of the present essay is to extend the account of BFO to a very special layer of reality, the world of social entities. While natural entities like bacteria, thunderstorms or temperatures exist independently from human action and thought, social entities like countries, hospitals or money come into being only through human collective intentions and collective actions. Recently, the regional ontology of the social world has attracted considerable research interest in philosophy - witness, e.g., the pioneering work by Gilbert, Tuomela and Searle. There is a considerable class of phenomena that require the participation of more than one human agent: nobody can tango alone, play tennis against oneself, or set up a parliamentary democracy for oneself. Through cooperation and coordination of their wills and actions, agents can act together - they can perform social actions and group actions. An important kind of social action is the establishment of an institution (e.g. a hospital, a research agency or a marriage) through mutual promise or (social) contract. Another important kind of social action is the imposition of a social status on certain entities. For example, a society can impose the status of being a 20 Euro note on certain pieces of paper or the status of being an approved medication to a certain chemical substance.
- Source
- Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.02
0.023654789 = product of:
0.070964366 = sum of:
0.06151114 = product of:
0.18453342 = sum of:
0.18453342 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18453342 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32834074 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.00945323 = product of:
0.01890646 = sum of:
0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01890646 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
- Source
- Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
-
Bringsjord, S.; Clark, M.; Taylor, J.: Sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning requires philosophy (2014)
0.02
0.02184669 = product of:
0.06554007 = sum of:
0.05242212 = weight(_text_:r in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05242212 = score(doc=3403,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.40890455 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.013117946 = product of:
0.026235892 = sum of:
0.026235892 = weight(_text_:22 in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026235892 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- What is knowledge representation and reasoning (KR&R)? Alas, a thorough account would require a book, or at least a dedicated, full-length paper, but here we shall have to make do with something simpler. Since most readers are likely to have an intuitive grasp of the essence of KR&R, our simple account should suffice. The interesting thing is that this simple account itself makes reference to some of the foundational distinctions in the field of philosophy. These distinctions also play a central role in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science. To begin with, the first distinction in KR&R is that we identify knowledge with knowledge that such-and-such holds (possibly to a degree), rather than knowing how. If you ask an expert tennis player how he manages to serve a ball at 130 miles per hour on his first serve, and then serve a safer, topspin serve on his second should the first be out, you may well receive a confession that, if truth be told, this athlete can't really tell you. He just does it; he does something he has been doing since his youth. Yet, there is no denying that he knows how to serve. In contrast, the knowledge in KR&R must be expressible in declarative statements. For example, our tennis player knows that if his first serve lands outside the service box, it's not in play. He thus knows a proposition, conditional in form.
- Date
- 9. 2.2017 19:22:14
- Source
- Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
-
Eito-Brun, R.: Ontologies and the exchange of technical information : building a knowledge repository based on ECSS standards (2014)
0.02
0.017449377 = product of:
0.05234813 = sum of:
0.018755108 = weight(_text_:r in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018755108 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.03359302 = sum of:
0.012604306 = weight(_text_:4 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012604306 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.11992966 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.020988714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020988714 = score(doc=1436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1436)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 4. 9.2014 14:11:40
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Tzitzikas, Y.; Spyratos, N.; Constantopoulos, P.; Analyti, A.: Extended faceted ontologies (2002)
0.02
0.017150164 = product of:
0.102900974 = sum of:
0.102900974 = weight(_text_:john in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102900974 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24518675 = queryWeight, product of:
6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.41968408 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.330911 = idf(docFreq=213, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Advanced Information Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the 14th Internarional Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2002), Toronto, Canada, May 27-31. Eds.: Anne Banks Pidduck, John Mylopoulos, Carson C. Woo, M. Tamer Özsu
-
Gayathri, R.; Uma, V.: Ontology based knowledge representation technique, domain modeling languages and planners for robotic path planning : a survey (2018)
0.02
0.01641294 = product of:
0.04923882 = sum of:
0.03978559 = weight(_text_:r in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03978559 = score(doc=5605,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
0.00945323 = product of:
0.01890646 = sum of:
0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01890646 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR & R) has become one of the promising fields of Artificial Intelligence. KR is dedicated towards representing information about the domain that can be utilized in path planning. Ontology based knowledge representation and reasoning techniques provide sophisticated knowledge about the environment for processing tasks or methods. Ontology helps in representing the knowledge about environment, events and actions that help in path planning and making robots more autonomous. Knowledge reasoning techniques can infer new conclusion and thus aids planning dynamically in a non-deterministic environment. In the initial sections, the representation of knowledge using ontology and the techniques for reasoning that could contribute in path planning are discussed in detail. In the following section, we also provide comparison of various planning domain modeling languages, ontology editors, planners and robot simulation tools.
- Source
- ICT express. 4(2018), no.2, S.69-74 [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959518300985]
-
Jimeno-Yepes, A.; Berlanga Llavori, R.; Rebholz-Schuhmann, D.: Ontology refinement for improved information retrieval (2010)
0.01
0.014616735 = product of:
0.043850206 = sum of:
0.03282144 = weight(_text_:r in 4234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03282144 = score(doc=4234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4234)
0.011028768 = product of:
0.022057535 = sum of:
0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 4234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022057535 = score(doc=4234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.4, S.426-435
-
Green, R.: See-also relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011)
0.01
0.014616735 = product of:
0.043850206 = sum of:
0.03282144 = weight(_text_:r in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03282144 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
0.011028768 = product of:
0.022057535 = sum of:
0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022057535 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.4, S.335-341
-
Green, R.: Semantic types, classes, and instantiation (2006)
0.01
0.01383385 = product of:
0.04150155 = sum of:
0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028132662 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.013368886 = product of:
0.026737772 = sum of:
0.026737772 = weight(_text_:4 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026737772 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Semantic types provide a level of abstraction over particulars with shared behavior, such as in the participant structure of semantic frames. The paper presents a preliminary investigation, drawing on data from WordNet and FrameNet, into the relationship between hierarchical level and the semantic types that name frame elements (a.k.a. slots). Patterns discovered include: (1) The level of abstraction of a frame is generally matched by the level of abstraction of its frame elements. (2) The roles played by persons tend to be expressed very specifically. (3) Frame elements that mirror the name of the frame tend to be expressed specifically. (4) Some frame participants tend to be expressed at a constant (general) level of abstraction, regardless of the level of abstraction of the overall frame.
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Rocha Souza, R.; Lemos, D.: a comparative analysis : Knowledge organization systems for the representation of multimedia resources on the Web (2020)
0.01
0.01383385 = product of:
0.04150155 = sum of:
0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028132662 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
0.013368886 = product of:
0.026737772 = sum of:
0.026737772 = weight(_text_:4 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026737772 = score(doc=5993,freq=4.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-4-300.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.4, S.300-319
-
Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001)
0.01
0.012528631 = product of:
0.03758589 = sum of:
0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028132662 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.00945323 = product of:
0.01890646 = sum of:
0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01890646 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Series
- Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
- Source
- Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Wei, W.; Liu, Y.-P.; Wei, L-R.: Feature-level sentiment analysis based on rules and fine-grained domain ontology (2020)
0.01
0.012528631 = product of:
0.03758589 = sum of:
0.028132662 = weight(_text_:r in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028132662 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.00945323 = product of:
0.01890646 = sum of:
0.01890646 = weight(_text_:4 in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01890646 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 4. 3.2020 14:17:52
-
Davies, J.; Weeks, R.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004)
0.01
0.011528208 = product of:
0.034584623 = sum of:
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=4320,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
0.011140739 = product of:
0.022281477 = sum of:
0.022281477 = weight(_text_:4 in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022281477 = score(doc=4320,freq=4.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.21200769 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/proceedings/h#4.
- Source
- Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 4, Big Island, Hawaii, January 05-January 08, 2004
-
Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997)
0.01
0.011197674 = product of:
0.06718604 = sum of:
0.06718604 = sum of:
0.025208613 = weight(_text_:4 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025208613 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.041977428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041977428 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1.10.2018 14:13:22
- Source
- AI communications. 10(1997) nos.3/4, S.167-176
-
Witte, R.; Krestel, R.; Kappler, T.; Lockemann, P.C.: Converting a historical architecture encyclopedia into a semantic knowledge base
0.01
0.011051553 = product of:
0.06630932 = sum of:
0.06630932 = weight(_text_:r in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06630932 = score(doc=4637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Yu, L.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Chang, R.-Y.; Liu, C.-H.; Hovy, E.H.: Annotation and verification of sense pools in OntoNotes (2010)
0.01
0.010440525 = product of:
0.031321574 = sum of:
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.007877692 = product of:
0.015755383 = sum of:
0.015755383 = weight(_text_:4 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015755383 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.4, S.436-447
-
Aker, A.; Plaza, L.; Lloret, E.; Gaizauskas, R.: Do humans have conceptual models about geographic objects? : a user study (2013)
0.01
0.010440525 = product of:
0.031321574 = sum of:
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
0.007877692 = product of:
0.015755383 = sum of:
0.015755383 = weight(_text_:4 in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015755383 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.689-700
-
Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015)
0.01
0.010440525 = product of:
0.031321574 = sum of:
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
0.007877692 = product of:
0.015755383 = sum of:
0.015755383 = weight(_text_:4 in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015755383 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
- Source
- Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.281-285
-
Cao, N.; Sun, J.; Lin, Y.-R.; Gotz, D.; Liu, S.; Qu, H.: FacetAtlas : Multifaceted visualization for rich text corpora (2010)
0.01
0.010440525 = product of:
0.031321574 = sum of:
0.023443883 = weight(_text_:r in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023443883 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12820137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
0.007877692 = product of:
0.015755383 = sum of:
0.015755383 = weight(_text_:4 in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015755383 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Documents in rich text corpora usually contain multiple facets of information. For example, an article about a specific disease often consists of different facets such as symptom, treatment, cause, diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention. Thus, documents may have different relations based on different facets. Powerful search tools have been developed to help users locate lists of individual documents that are most related to specific keywords. However, there is a lack of effective analysis tools that reveal the multifaceted relations of documents within or cross the document clusters. In this paper, we present FacetAtlas, a multifaceted visualization technique for visually analyzing rich text corpora. FacetAtlas combines search technology with advanced visual analytical tools to convey both global and local patterns simultaneously. We describe several unique aspects of FacetAtlas, including (1) node cliques and multifaceted edges, (2) an optimized density map, and (3) automated opacity pattern enhancement for highlighting visual patterns, (4) interactive context switch between facets. In addition, we demonstrate the power of FacetAtlas through a case study that targets patient education in the health care domain. Our evaluation shows the benefits of this work, especially in support of complex multifaceted data analysis.
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.01
0.009797964 = product of:
0.058787785 = sum of:
0.058787785 = sum of:
0.022057535 = weight(_text_:4 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022057535 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.105097495 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.03673025 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03673025 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13562064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03872851 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 4. 9.2014 14:11:40
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
