Search (987 results, page 2 of 50)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.04 
    0.03771992 = product of:
  0.07543984 = sum of:
    0.07543984 = sum of:
      0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03844473 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036995113 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  2. Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019) 0.04 
    0.03771992 = product of:
  0.07543984 = sum of:
    0.07543984 = sum of:
      0.03844473 = weight(_text_:k in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03844473 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.036995113 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036995113 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:22:49
  3. Dahl, E.; Pauen, M.: Schuld und freier Wille (2010) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Diskussion: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23.
  4. Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:04:21
  5. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  6. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  7. Khoo, C.S.G.; Teng, T.B.-R.; Ng, H.-C.; Wong, K.-P.: Developing a taxonomy to support user browsing and learning in a digital heritage portal with crowd-sourced content (2014) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Mahesh, K.: Highly expressive tagging for knowledge organization in the 21st century (2014) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Isah, E.E.; Byström, K.: Physicians' learning at work through everyday access to information (2016) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:31:37
  11. Balakrishnan, V.; Ahmadi, K.; Ravana, S.D.: Improving retrieval relevance using users' explicit feedback (2016) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Tang, K.-H.; Tsai, L.-C.; Hwang, S.-L.: ¬The development and validation of a one-bit comparison for evaluating the maturity of tag distributions in a Web 2.0 environment (2016) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:13:22
  13. Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Osatuyi, B.; Hiltz, S.R.; Passerini, K.: Seeing is believing (or at least changing your mind) : the influence of visibility and task complexity on preference changes in computer-supported team decision making (2016) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article describes an experimental study that examines the extent to which a group decision support system (GDSS), which allows team members to view other members' preference ratings, can encourage changes in individual preferences. We studied 22, four-person teams performing 2 hidden profile tasks-simple and complex-in a controlled setting. Transparency of the interactions, achieved through the visibility of ratings, influenced changes in participants' preferences as measured before, during and after the team discussion. Visibility of team scores could then offer an effective way to reach consensus, despite individual incumbent preferences. Changes between individuals' initial preferences and team preferences were found to be larger for members working on a complex task compared to a simple task, as were changes between individuals' prediscussion and postdiscussion preferences. Although prior studies established that the initial preferences of individual team members are rather sticky, this study reveals that individuals adjusted their initial preferences to reach a team consensus, as well as modified their preferences after team discussions. Despite the mixed earlier research results on the impact of GDSS on efficient decision making, findings from this study suggest that in complex decision-making contexts, GDSS tools can be effective in enabling consensus building in groups.
  15. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
  16. Li, L.; He, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, L.; Zhang, K.: Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites : a cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate (2018) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.03 
    0.03143327 = product of:
  0.06286654 = sum of:
    0.06286654 = sum of:
      0.032037273 = weight(_text_:k in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032037273 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
      0.030829264 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030829264 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045509085 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22
  18. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03 
    0.027105184 = product of:
  0.05421037 = sum of:
    0.05421037 = product of:
      0.21684147 = sum of:
        0.21684147 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21684147 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38582653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  19. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03 
    0.027105184 = product of:
  0.05421037 = sum of:
    0.05421037 = product of:
      0.21684147 = sum of:
        0.21684147 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21684147 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38582653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  20. Kaptein, U.: Überarbeitete Kindersystematik der KAB (2010) 0.03 
    0.02562982 = product of:
  0.05125964 = sum of:
    0.05125964 = product of:
      0.10251928 = sum of:
        0.10251928 = weight(_text_:k in 4089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10251928 = score(doc=4089,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 4089, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Bibliotheken in den neuen Bundesländern warten bereits sehnsüchtig darauf jetzt ist sie da: die neue KAB-K! Druckfrisch kann die Ausgabe bei der ekz.bibliotheksser vice GmbH in Reutlingen für 14,90 Euro erworben werden (E-Mail Medien. Verkauf@ekz.de). Dort findet die KAB-K auch schon seit Beginn des Jahres Anwendung. Alle ab ID 1/10 veröffentlichten Titel werden danach systematisiert. Bereits früher veröffentlichte Titel können nicht umsystematisiert werden. Inhaltliche Fragen zur neuen KAB-K beantwortet das Team Systematisierung: Ute Kaptein, Telefon 0 71 21/144-161.
    Object
    KAB-K

Authors

Languages

  • e 722
  • d 258
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 83
  • b 4
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications