Search (1742 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13 
    0.12580177 = product of:
  0.25160354 = sum of:
    0.25160354 = product of:
      0.5032071 = sum of:
        0.19635631 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19635631 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41925266 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.30685076 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30685076 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52410346 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Hesse, C.: ¬Das kleine Einmaleins des klaren Denkens : 22 Denkwerkzeuge für ein besseres Leben (2009) 0.11 
    0.11001377 = product of:
  0.22002754 = sum of:
    0.22002754 = sum of:
      0.17982735 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17982735 = score(doc=2137,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 2137, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2137)
      0.040200192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040200192 = score(doc=2137,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2137, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2137)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    München : C.H. Beck
  3. Brown, J.S.; Duguid, P.: ¬The social life of information (2000) 0.11 
    0.10694631 = sum of:
  0.017032638 = product of:
    0.06813055 = sum of:
      0.06813055 = weight(_text_:authors in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06813055 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.08991367 = product of:
    0.17982735 = sum of:
      0.17982735 = weight(_text_:c.h in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17982735 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.4, S.320-321 (A.-C.H. Dianu): "Are you a cyberutopian or a technophobe? Do you believe that cyberspace is the ultimate home for all humans, or you completely deny the advancement of information technology? Is there a middle ground between the two extremes? Where is it and how to find it? It is exactly the middle ground that the authors, John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid, try to discover and propose in this book. From management, research to education, the book demonstrates that information technology is deeply embedded in its social context, as suggested in the book title. By uprooting it from its social context and detaching all human elements from it, information technology will no longer be viable. On the one hand, the book serves as a warning to information designers by emphasizing the importance of social and human elements in information technology development. On the other hand, it reveals to information users the importance of realizing the embedding of information technology in our lives."
  4. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09 
    0.09346277 = sum of:
  0.07671269 = product of:
    0.30685076 = sum of:
      0.30685076 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30685076 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.52410346 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016750082 = product of:
    0.033500165 = sum of:
      0.033500165 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033500165 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  5. Innovationsforum 2003 : [Informationskompetenz] (2003) 0.09 
    0.09167814 = product of:
  0.18335629 = sum of:
    0.18335629 = sum of:
      0.14985612 = weight(_text_:c.h in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14985612 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
      0.033500165 = weight(_text_:22 in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033500165 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2008 17:36:03
    Editor
    Schütte, C.H.
  6. Farooq, U.; Ganoe, C.H.; Carroll, J.M.; Councill, I.G.; Giles, C.L.: Design and evaluation of awareness mechanisms in CiteSeer (2008) 0.09 
    0.09167814 = product of:
  0.18335629 = sum of:
    0.18335629 = sum of:
      0.14985612 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14985612 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.4091512 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.033500165 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033500165 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 7.2008 19:27:22
  7. Bennett, C.H.; Li, M.; Ma, B.: ¬Die Evolution der Kettenbriefe (2004) 0.09 
    0.08991367 = product of:
  0.17982735 = sum of:
    0.17982735 = product of:
      0.3596547 = sum of:
        0.3596547 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3596547 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.9819629 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08 
    0.079006985 = sum of:
  0.05890689 = product of:
    0.23562756 = sum of:
      0.23562756 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23562756 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41925266 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020100096 = product of:
    0.040200192 = sum of:
      0.040200192 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040200192 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  9. Davis, C.H.: Indexing and index editing at Chemical Abstracts before the Registry System (2004) 0.07 
    0.07492806 = product of:
  0.14985612 = sum of:
    0.14985612 = product of:
      0.29971224 = sum of:
        0.29971224 = weight(_text_:c.h in 4177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29971224 = score(doc=4177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.8183024 = fieldWeight in 4177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Haarmann, H.: Geschichte der Schrift (2002) 0.07 
    0.07334251 = product of:
  0.14668502 = sum of:
    0.14668502 = sum of:
      0.11988489 = weight(_text_:c.h in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11988489 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.32732096 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
      0.02680013 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02680013 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
    Imprint
    München : C.H. Beck
  11. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06 
    0.05786841 = sum of:
  0.034418296 = product of:
    0.13767318 = sum of:
      0.13767318 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13767318 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023450114 = product of:
    0.046900228 = sum of:
      0.046900228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046900228 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Block, C.H.: ¬Das Intranet : die neue Informationsverarbeitung (2004) 0.05 
    0.05244964 = product of:
  0.10489928 = sum of:
    0.10489928 = product of:
      0.20979856 = sum of:
        0.20979856 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20979856 = score(doc=2396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.57281166 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05 
    0.051552534 = sum of:
  0.028102418 = product of:
    0.11240967 = sum of:
      0.11240967 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11240967 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023450114 = product of:
    0.046900228 = sum of:
      0.046900228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046900228 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  14. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05 
    0.045458473 = sum of:
  0.017032638 = product of:
    0.06813055 = sum of:
      0.06813055 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06813055 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.028425833 = product of:
    0.056851666 = sum of:
      0.056851666 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056851666 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  15. ¬The history and heritage of scientific and technological information systems : Proceedings of the 2002 Conference (2004) 0.04 
    0.044956837 = product of:
  0.08991367 = sum of:
    0.08991367 = product of:
      0.17982735 = sum of:
        0.17982735 = weight(_text_:c.h in 5897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17982735 = score(doc=5897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 5897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: Fugmann, R.: Learning the lessons of the past; Davis, C.H.: Indexing and index editing at Chemical Abstracts before the Registry System; Roe , E.M.: Abstracts and indexes to branded full text: what's in a name?; Lynch, M.F.: Introduction of computers in chemical structure information systems, or what is not recorded in the annals; Baatz, S.: Medical science and medical informatics: The visible human project, 1986-2000.
  16. Schleichert, H.: Wie man mit Fundamentalisten diskutiert, ohne den Verstand zu verlieren : oder Anleitung zum subversiven Denken (2004) 0.04 
    0.044956837 = product of:
  0.08991367 = sum of:
    0.08991367 = product of:
      0.17982735 = sum of:
        0.17982735 = weight(_text_:c.h in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17982735 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    München : C.H. Beck
  17. Edelman, G.M.; Tononi, G.: Gehirn und Geist : Wie aus Materie Bewusstsein entsteht (2002) 0.04 
    0.044956837 = product of:
  0.08991367 = sum of:
    0.08991367 = product of:
      0.17982735 = sum of:
        0.17982735 = weight(_text_:c.h in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17982735 = score(doc=2416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36626098 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049451772 = queryNorm
            0.49098146 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    München : C.H. Beck
  18. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.04 
    0.044187885 = sum of:
  0.024087789 = product of:
    0.096351154 = sum of:
      0.096351154 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096351154 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020100096 = product of:
    0.040200192 = sum of:
      0.040200192 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040200192 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51
  19. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.04 
    0.044187885 = sum of:
  0.024087789 = product of:
    0.096351154 = sum of:
      0.096351154 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096351154 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.020100096 = product of:
    0.040200192 = sum of:
      0.040200192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040200192 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  20. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.04 
    0.043321524 = sum of:
  0.01987141 = product of:
    0.07948564 = sum of:
      0.07948564 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07948564 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22544144 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023450114 = product of:
    0.046900228 = sum of:
      0.046900228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046900228 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17317168 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049451772 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1453
  • m 208
  • el 83
  • s 77
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications