Search (1756 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13 
    0.12595232 = product of:
  0.25190464 = sum of:
    0.25190464 = product of:
      0.5038093 = sum of:
        0.1965913 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1965913 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41975442 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.307218 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.307218 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5247307 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Horng, J.T.; Yeh, C.C.: Applying genetic algorithms to query optimization in document retrieval (2000) 0.10 
    0.10315437 = product of:
  0.20630874 = sum of:
    0.20630874 = product of:
      0.41261747 = sum of:
        0.41261747 = weight(_text_:j.t in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41261747 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            1.135376 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.09 
    0.09357462 = sum of:
  0.0768045 = product of:
    0.307218 = sum of:
      0.307218 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.307218 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5247307 = queryWeight, product of:
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.016770126 = product of:
    0.033540253 = sum of:
      0.033540253 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033540253 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  4. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.09 
    0.08841802 = product of:
  0.17683604 = sum of:
    0.17683604 = product of:
      0.3536721 = sum of:
        0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3536721 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Javitt, D.C.; Coyle, J.T.: Wenn Hirnsignale verrückt spielen (2004) 0.09 
    0.08841802 = product of:
  0.17683604 = sum of:
    0.17683604 = product of:
      0.3536721 = sum of:
        0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3536721 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (2006) 0.09 
    0.08841802 = product of:
  0.17683604 = sum of:
    0.17683604 = product of:
      0.3536721 = sum of:
        0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3536721 = score(doc=570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=570)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08 
    0.07910154 = sum of:
  0.058977388 = product of:
    0.23590955 = sum of:
      0.23590955 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23590955 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41975442 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02012415 = product of:
    0.0402483 = sum of:
      0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0402483 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Bohlen, J.T.: ChemGuide und PublishersGuide : Neue spezialisierte Internet-Suchmaschinen des FIZ Chemie Berlin (2000) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 5236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=5236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 5236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Mining the metadata quarries : Special section (2003) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Einleitung zu den Beiträgen: GUENTHER, R. et al.: New metadata standards for digital resources: MODS and METS; GREENBERG, J.: Metadata generation: processes, people and tools; TENNIS, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability: Dublin Core audience element; JUN, W.: A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurs and metadata in a digital library
  10. Tennis, J.T.: URIS and intertextuality : incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web (2004) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Tennis, J.T.: Two axes of domains for domain analysis (2003) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 3010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=3010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 3010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Tennis, J.T.: Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization : toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework (2008) 0.06 
    0.05894535 = product of:
  0.1178907 = sum of:
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2357814 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.06 
    0.05793766 = sum of:
  0.034459483 = product of:
    0.13783793 = sum of:
      0.13783793 = weight(_text_:authors in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13783793 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.61068267 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023478176 = product of:
    0.046956353 = sum of:
      0.046956353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046956353 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.05 
    0.054271087 = product of:
  0.108542174 = sum of:
    0.108542174 = sum of:
      0.08841802 = weight(_text_:j.t in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08841802 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.24329484 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.02012415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02012415 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zins, C.: Knowledge map of information science: issues, principles, implications. - Lin, X., S. Aluker u. W. Zhu u.a.: Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer. - Kohlbacher, F.: Knowledge organization(s) in Japan: empirical evidence from Japanese and western corporations. - Beghtol, C.: The global learning society and the iterative relationship between theory and practice in knowledge organization systems. - Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. - Doyle, A.: Naming and reclaiming knowledges in public intersections of landscapes and experience. - Qin, J., P. Creticos u. W.Y. Hsiao: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge. - Gnoli, C.: The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications. - Loehrlein, A., E.K. Jacob u. S. Lee u.a.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification. - Thellefsen, M.: The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation. - LaBarre, K.: A multi faceted view: use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access. - Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. - Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures. - Friedman, A.: Concept mapping a measurable sign. - Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri. - Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs. - Robert, C.A., A. Davis: Annotation and its application to information research in economic intelligence. - Mcllwaine, I.C., J.S. Mitchel: The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion. - Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages. - Eito Brun, R.: Uncovering hidden clues about geographic visualization in LCC. - Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet progress and prospects. - Pajarillo, E.J.Y.: A classification scheme to determine medical necessity: a knowledge organization global learning application. - López-Huertas, M.J.: Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation: the gender studies. - Rodriguez Bravo, B.: The visibility of women in indexing languages. - Beall, J., D. Vizine-Goetz: Finding fiction: facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format. - Kwasnik, B.H., Y.L. Chun u. K. Crowston u.a.: Challenges in ceating a taxonomy of genres of digital documents. - Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation: using wikis in science. - Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis: a study. - Lee, H.L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword: two cultural perspectives. - Loehrlein, A., R. Martin u. E.L. Robertson: Integration of international standards in the domain of manufacturing enterprise. -
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36
  16. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.05 
    0.051614225 = sum of:
  0.028136048 = product of:
    0.112544194 = sum of:
      0.112544194 = weight(_text_:authors in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112544194 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023478176 = product of:
    0.046956353 = sum of:
      0.046956353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046956353 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
  17. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.05 
    0.051577184 = product of:
  0.10315437 = sum of:
    0.10315437 = product of:
      0.20630874 = sum of:
        0.20630874 = weight(_text_:j.t in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20630874 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049510952 = queryNorm
            0.567688 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05 
    0.04551287 = sum of:
  0.017053021 = product of:
    0.068212084 = sum of:
      0.068212084 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068212084 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.028459849 = product of:
    0.056919698 = sum of:
      0.056919698 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056919698 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  19. Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006) 0.04 
    0.044240765 = sum of:
  0.024116613 = product of:
    0.09646645 = sum of:
      0.09646645 = weight(_text_:authors in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09646645 = score(doc=5293,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02012415 = product of:
    0.0402483 = sum of:
      0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0402483 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:38:51
  20. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.04 
    0.044240765 = sum of:
  0.024116613 = product of:
    0.09646645 = sum of:
      0.09646645 = weight(_text_:authors in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09646645 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.02012415 = product of:
    0.0402483 = sum of:
      0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0402483 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049510952 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Why authors choose some references in preference to others is a question that is still not wholly answered despite its being of interest to scientists. The relevance of references is twofold: They are a mechanism for tracing the evolution of science, and because they enhance the image of the cited authors, citations are a widely known and used indicator of scientific endeavor. Following an extensive review of the literature, we selected all papers that seek to answer the central question and demonstrate that the existing theories are not sufficient: Neither citation nor indicator theory provides a complete and convincing answer. Some perspectives in this arena remain, which are isolated from the core literature. The purpose of this article is to offer a fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion. We suggest reviving the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1469
  • m 205
  • el 84
  • s 80
  • b 26
  • x 14
  • i 8
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications