Search (1641 results, page 1 of 83)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.45 
    0.45137095 = product of:
  0.7898991 = sum of:
    0.078989916 = product of:
      0.23696974 = sum of:
        0.23696974 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23696974 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.23696974 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23696974 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
    0.23696974 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23696974 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
    0.23696974 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23696974 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.43 
    0.43398947 = product of:
  0.60758525 = sum of:
    0.059242435 = product of:
      0.1777273 = sum of:
        0.1777273 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1777273 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.39 
    0.3949496 = product of:
  0.69116175 = sum of:
    0.069116175 = product of:
      0.20734853 = sum of:
        0.20734853 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20734853 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.20734853 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20734853 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.20734853 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20734853 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.20734853 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20734853 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.34 
    0.33852822 = product of:
  0.59242433 = sum of:
    0.059242435 = product of:
      0.1777273 = sum of:
        0.1777273 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1777273 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.1777273 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1777273 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.28 
    0.28210685 = product of:
  0.49368697 = sum of:
    0.049368694 = product of:
      0.14810608 = sum of:
        0.14810608 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14810608 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14810608 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14810608 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.14810608 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14810608 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
    0.14810608 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14810608 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.23 
    0.22568548 = product of:
  0.39494956 = sum of:
    0.039494958 = product of:
      0.11848487 = sum of:
        0.11848487 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11848487 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11848487 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11848487 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.11848487 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11848487 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.11848487 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11848487 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3162306 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Talja, S.: ¬The social and discursive construction of computing skills (2005) 0.05 
    0.046216685 = product of:
  0.1617584 = sum of:
    0.14912428 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 4902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14912428 = score(doc=4902,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 4902, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4902)
    0.012634118 = product of:
      0.025268236 = sum of:
        0.025268236 = weight(_text_:22 in 4902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025268236 = score(doc=4902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    In this article a social constructionist approach to information technology (IT) literacy is introduced. This approach contributes to the literature an IT literacy by introducing the concept of IT self as a description of the momentary, context-dependent, and multilayered nature of interpretations of IT competencies. In the research litersture, IT literacy is offen defined as sets of basic skills to be learned, and competencies to be demonstrated. In line with this approach, research an IT competencies conventionally develops models for explaining user acceptance, and for measuring computer-related attitudes and skills. The assumption is that computerrelated attitudes and seif-efficacy impact IT adoption and success in computer use. Computer seif-efficacy measures are, however, often based an seif-assessments that measure interpretations of skills rather than performance in practice. An analysis of empirical interview data in which academic researchers discuss their relationships with computers and IT competence shows how a seif-assessment such as "computer anxiety" presented in one discussion context can in another discussion context be consigned to the past in favor of a different and more positive version. Here it is argued that descriptions of IT competencies and computer-related attitudes are dialogic social constructs and closely tied with more general implicit understandings of the nature of technical artifacts and technical knowledge. These implicit theories and assumptions are rarely taken under scrutiny in discussions of IT literacy yet they have profound implications for the aims and methods in teaching computer skills.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.13-22
  8. ¬Der große, exklusive TOMORROW-Text : Die beste Suchmaschine der Welt ... und der beste Web-Katalog ... und der beste Metasucher (2000) 0.04 
    0.035635818 = product of:
  0.24945071 = sum of:
    0.24945071 = weight(_text_:quantenphysik in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24945071 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34685326 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.71918225 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Darunter Einzel-Beiträge zu: Acoon, Yahoo, MetaGer; Interviews mit den Suchmaschinen-Bossen zu: Wer ist der Lieblingskonkurrent?; So arbeitet eine Suchmaschine; KARZAUNINKAT, S.: So einfach finden sie, was Sie gerade wollen; 20 Fragen: Welcher Suchmaschinen-Typ sind Sie?; KARZAUNINKAT, S.: Kontrolle ist der beste Schutz; BETZ, S.: Darum suchen Sie kostenlos; GLASER, S.: Zwischen Quatsch und Quantenphysik; Suchmaschinen für Spezialfragen
  9. Volpi, J.: ¬Das Klingsor-Paradox (2002) 0.04 
    0.035635818 = product of:
  0.24945071 = sum of:
    0.24945071 = weight(_text_:quantenphysik in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24945071 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34685326 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.71918225 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Wieder erscheint ein Roman mit Bezug zur Mathematik, und diesmal ein besonders schöner, vollendeter und ernsthafter Roman. Jorge Volpi zeichnet in Das Klingsor-Paradox nach, wie sich die Quantenphysik im Schatten des Dritten Reiches entwickelt hat, und fädelt das Geschehene in eine Nachkriegsgeschichte ein, die von einer Handvoll Physikern, von Verbrechen, Verantwortung und Verrat erzählt
  10. Görnitz, T.; Görnitz, B.: ¬Der kreative Kosmos : Geist und Materie aus Information (2002) 0.03 
    0.028458612 = product of:
  0.19921027 = sum of:
    0.19921027 = weight(_text_:quantenphysik in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19921027 = score(doc=16,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.34685326 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.5743359 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    BK
    33.23 Quantenphysik
    Classification
    33.23 Quantenphysik
    Footnote
    Die Autoren betonen, dass weder die klassische Information noch die Quanteninformation allein eine vollständige Beschreibung der Wirklichkeit liefern können. Nötig sei vielmehr das »gegenseitige Bedingen und Auseinander-Hervorgehen« von Fakten und Möglichkeiten, was sie als »Schichtenstruktur von klassischer Physik und Quantenphysik« bezeichnen. Da die Autoren von der Universalität der Information ausgehen, vermuten sie genau diese Schichtenstruktur auch als Grundlage der Informationsverarbeitung im Gehirn. Entscheidend sei nicht der Unterschied zwischen dem Unbewussten und dem Bewussten, die beide nur eine Form von Information seien, sondern zwischen der klassischen und der Quanteninformation. Das Selbsterleben habe nun neben dem Zugang zu Fakten auch Zugang zu Quanteninformation: »Denkendes Selbst erleben bildet einen individuellen Quantenprozess, der in seinem Kern bis zum Tod des Lebewesens nicht klassisch wird.« Damit überschreiten die Autoren in einem wesentlichen Punkt das heutige Verständnis der Quantentheorie, demzufolge einem Beobachter der Zugang zur Quanteninformation stets versagt ist, da diese durch eine Messung stets zerstört wird. Quanteninformation beschreibt alle zukünftigen Möglichkeiten eines bestimmten Quantenzustands zugleich, samt deren Veränderungen in der Zeit. Die Autoren sehen hierin eine Erklärung für die Assoziativität des Denkens und die »Nichtentschiedenheit« des Unbewussten. Aber gibt es in unserem Bewusstsein tatsächlich das gleichzeitige Erleben einander ausschließender Möglichkeiten? Dies scheint zunächst wenig plausibel, erleben wir unser Denken doch als grundsätzlich sequenziell, auch wenn wir rasch zwischen den verschiedensten Gegenständen wechseln und dabei mehrere Aspekte dieser Gegenstände im Auge behalten können. Aber auch wenn tiefergehende Introspektion gewisse Aspekte von Parallelität aufzeigen mag, droht hier doch die Schlussfolgerung, dass der Zugang zur Quanteninformation nur ein vermittelter ist, was die ursprüngliche Annahme in Frage stellen würde. Dies bedürfte umso mehr der Klärung, als die Autoren argumentieren, die enorme Geschwindigkeit des Gehirns bei der Lösung komplexer Aufgaben sei nur durch das gleichzeitige Durchdenken aller Möglichkeiten zu erklären: die einem Quantencomputer inhärente Parallelverarbeitung.
    Durch die Bildung von neuen, räumlich ausgedehnten Quantenzuständen aus ursprünglich getrennten Zuständen könne schließlich zum einen das »Bindungsproblem« der Hirnforschung gelöst werden, wie nämlich Informationen über ein Objekt an unterschiedlichen Orten im Gehirn zusammengefasst und als Einheit erlebt werden können. Zum anderen enthielten solche kombinierten Quantenzustände die Antworten auf gänzlich neue »Fragen«. Diese Antworten könnten bei Feststellungen oder Entscheidungen zu Fakten werden, die in den Ausgangszuständen gar nicht enthalten waren. So könne im Rahmen der Quantenphysik tatsächlich Neues entstehen. Wie der Titel andeutet, geht das Buch über die hier geschilderten Aspekte hinaus. Es verankert den universellen Informationsbegriff in der Kosmologie, nach dem Vorbild Carl Friedrich von Weizsäckers, dessen Ure in der heutigen Terminologie zu Quantenbits geworden sind, und zeichnet die Evolution der Information von der Strukturbildung in der Natur bis zur Schaffung von Bedeutung in Gehirnen nach. Gleichzeitig sucht es in den Arbeiten von Sigmund Freud und Carl Gustav Jung nach Analogien zur Quantentheorie, versucht etwa das »kollektive Unbewusste« Jungs mit der Quanteninformation im Unbewussten in Beziehung zu setzen. Das Buch ist für einen breiten Leserkreis geschrieben und auch tatsächlich geeignet. Seine Stärke liegt darin, dass es aus einer tiefen Kenntnis der Quantentheorie heraus entstanden ist und deren Möglichkeiten konsequent weiterdenkt. Wenn man dabei auch nicht jedem Argument folgen oder jede Analogie für plausibel halten mag, so ist doch insgesamt ein konsistenter Rahmen geschaffen, der sogar experimentell - durch Introspektion - überprüft werden kann, noch bevor zukünftige Messmethoden Quantenzustände in Gehirnen nachweisen können. Eine wesentliche Frage wird dann sein, ob es im Gehirn makroskopisch ausgedehnte Quantenzustände gibt. Dies dürften viele Physiker bezweifeln. Die Autoren vermuten vor allem Photonen, also elektromagnetische Felder, als Träger von Quanteninformation. Damit haben sich die Autoren nichts weniger vorgenommen als eine Lösung des notorischen Leib-Seele-Problems: Ist alles Denken Folge physiologischer Prozesse und wegen deren Determiniertheit die erlebte Freiheit des Geistes eine Illusion, oder muss man zu einem nichtkausalen Dualismus zwischen Geist und Materie übergehen? Die meisten Naturwissenschaftler wählen die erste Alternative, einige wenige die zweite - und die Autoren eine dritte. Sie erklären die Information zur primären Substanz, räumen Gedanken und anderen erlebten Zuständen denselben Status ein wie materiellen Einheiten; die Kausalität bleibt erhalten, indem die Quantenmechanik zur grundlegenden Theorie der Information erhoben wird. Damit können nicht nur körperliche Zustände zur Ursache von Gedanken werden, sondern insbesondere auch Gedanken körperliche Zustände verursachen. Gibt es in diesem Rahmen eine Chance für die Freiheit des Denkens und Wollens? Die Autoren sehen sie in dem Wechselspiel von durch Fakten bestimmter Notwendigkeit und dem neue Möglichkeiten eröffnenden Zufall, wie es in der Schichtenstruktur von klassischer und Quantenphysik vorgeprägt sei. Diese Antwort vermag zwar noch nicht zu überzeugen. Vermutlich ist es aber auch gar nicht die Aufgabe der Naturwissenschaft, die Freiheit des Menschen zu erklären oder zu beweisen. Die Autoren sprechen deshalb auch nur von einem Rahmen, der Freiheit innerhalb einer naturwissenschaftlichen Weltbeschreibung zu denken erlaube. Die Schaffung dieses Rahmens, der mit der Lösung des Dilemmas zwischen Subjektivität und Kausalität zusammenhängt, ist die wesentliche Leistung dieses außergewöhnlichen Buches."
  11. Loehrlein, A.: ¬The benefits of participating in a form of life : interpretations of complex concepts among experts and novices in records management (2008) 0.03 
    0.025564162 = product of:
  0.17894913 = sum of:
    0.17894913 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 2240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17894913 = score(doc=2240,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.6706493 = fieldWeight in 2240, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2240)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    This study is an empirical investigation into the specific advantages gained through familiarity with forms of life and their accompanying language games, as understood by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953), when interpreting and conceptualizing about complex concepts that are represented within that form of life. Subjects with experience in a specific form of life, e.g., records management, were presented with passages representing complex concepts embedded in that form life. The subjects were asked to rank interpretations of those passages in order to determine which aspects of the complex concepts they found most salient. Their responses were compared with those of two groups of novices in records management. The differences in responses between the three groups highlight the specific knowledge effects at work. Finally, the paper addresses methods for distinguishing between familiarity with concepts and familiarity with language.
  12. Popper, K.R.: ¬Das offene Universum : ein Argument für den Indeterminismus (2001) 0.03 
    0.025454152 = product of:
  0.17817906 = sum of:
    0.17817906 = weight(_text_:quantenphysik in 4501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17817906 = score(doc=4501,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34685326 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.51370156 = fieldWeight in 4501, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4501)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    "In Das offene Universum: Ein Argument für den Indeterminismus präsentiert Popper eine Kritik des 'wissenschaftlichen' und des metaphysischen Determinismus und argumentiert, daß die klassische Physik den Determinismus genauso wenig voraussetzt oder impliziert wie die Quantenphysik. Dennoch stellt er fest, daß der metaphysische Determinismus den Werken vieler zeitgenössischer Quantenphysiker immer noch zugrundeliegt, inklusive den Werken von Gegnern des Determinismus. Popper verfolgt die Rollen, die die subjektive Interpretation der Wahrscheinlichkeit in der Physik immer noch spielt, bis hin zu diesen metaphysischen deterministischen Voraussetzungen [.]. Der [.] Band tritt in seiner Abhandlung über den Determinismus für die Ansicht ein, daß unsere Rationalität, was die Voraussage des zukünftigen Wachstums des menschlichen Wissens anbelangt, begrenzt ist. Wenn es keine solche Grenze gäbe, wären ernsthafte Argumente sinnlos: und ihr Auftreten wäre eine Illusion.Popper argumentiert also, daß die menschliche Rationalität, was Kritik anbelangt, unbegrenzt ist, jedoch begrenzt, was ihre Voraussagekraft anbelangt; und er zeigt, daß die Unbegrenztheit und die Begrenztheit jede in ihrem Gebiet notwendig sind, damit es die menschliche Rationalität überhaupt geben kann." (Der Herausgeber im Nachwort).
  13. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.03 
    0.025223158 = product of:
  0.1765621 = sum of:
    0.1765621 = sum of:
      0.115918346 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.115918346 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18058759 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.060643762 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060643762 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Springer, M.: Ist das Gehirn ein Quantencomputer? (2006) 0.03 
    0.025198324 = product of:
  0.17638826 = sum of:
    0.17638826 = weight(_text_:quantenphysik in 5313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17638826 = score(doc=5313,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34685326 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.5085386 = fieldWeight in 5313, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5313)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    "Die unscheinbare graue Grütze im Schädel spiegelt jedem von uns eine private Welt vor, deren sinnlicher Reichtum noch das kühnste Multiversum übertrifft, das ein Kosmologe sich auszudenken vermag. Irgendwie bringt die feuchte, lauwarme Masse es fertig, uns das letztlich unbeschreibliche Erleben von Farben, Tönen und Gerüchen, von Schmerzen und Stimmungen zu bescheren. Nur wie? Das ist die berüchtigte Erklärungslücke der Bewusstseinsforschung. Manche sehen darin ein Scheinproblem, andere ein unlösbares Rätsel, und wieder andere mühen sich um einen Brückenschlag zwischen objektiver Hirntätigkeit und subjektiven »Qualia«. Einige Brückenbauer suchen dabei ihr Heil in der Quantenphysik. In der Tat haben Bewusstseins- und Quantenphänomene auf den ersten Blick etwas Entscheidendes gemeinsam: Beide sind »holistisch«. Qualia werden als Ganzheiten erlebt, nicht als Stückwerk verschiedener Sinnesdaten. Analog lassen sich typische Quantenzustände - anders als klassische Mehrteilchensysteme - nicht als bloße Summe der Zustände der beteiligten Partikel beschreiben, weshalb Physiker sie als nichtlokal, kohärent oder verschränkt bezeichnen. Außerdem sah es zumindest anfangs so aus, als enthalte die Quantentheorie eine subjektive Komponente. Gemäß der Kopenhagener Deutung hat es keinen Sinn, von der Existenz einer Teilcheneigenschaft zu sprechen, bevor sie beobachtet wird. Einige Interpreten gingen sogar so weit, unter Beobachtung nicht die Wechselwirkung zwischen Quantenobjekt und Messgerät zu verstehen, sondern den Eintritt des Messresultats ins Bewusstsein des Beobachters. Diese vagen Analogien nährten die Hoffnung, mit überlagerten Quantenzuständen die Erklärungslücke der Hirnforschung schließen zu können. Prominentester Hoffnungsträger ist dabei der Mathematiker und Gravitationstheoretiker Roger Penrose. Seiner Überzeugung nach wird eine künftigeTheorie der Quantengravitation nicht nur das Messproblem der Quantenmechanik lösen, sondern auch eine Physik des Bewusstseins begründen. So allgemein hat diese Idee einen gewissen Charme. Die Synthese von Quantenphysik und Gravitationstheorie wird derzeit in so abstrakten Gebilden gesucht wie Strings oder Loop-Quanten, und wer wollte ausschließen, dass bei dieser großen Vereinigung auch etwas für die Bewusstseinsforschung abfällt. Doch hat sich Penrose von dem Anästhesisten Stuart Hameroff einreden lassen, in den Mikrotubuli, langen Röhrenmolekülen im Zellskelett, den Sitz des Quantenbewusstseins zu vermuten. Das war ein Fehler. Über die noch nicht existente Quantengravitation lässt sich trefflich spekulieren, und Penrose gilt als Fachmann beim Skizzieren ihrer möglichen Umrisse. In den Niederungen der konkreten Hirnforschung dagegen ist er blutiger Laie. Und so fing er sich denn auch jetzt eine volle Breitseite des Hirnforschers Christof Koch ein, der in einem Beitrag in »Nature« (Bd. 440, S. 611) die Schwachpunkte in den kühnen Gedankenflügen des Mathematikers bloßstellt. Die Effekte der Quantenmechanik machen sich in aller Regel nur im submikroskopischen Bereich bemerkbar. Zudem sind kohärente Mehrteilchenzustände extrem störanfällig, sodass sie sich bisher lediglich mit wenigen Partikeln oder bei extrem tiefen Temperaturen erzeugen ließen. Zellmoleküle haben im Vergleich dazu, so Koch, riesige Ausmaße. Obendrein ist das Gehirn bei seiner Betriebstemperatur-300 Grad über absolut null -für nutzbare Quanteneffekte viel zu heiß. Obwohl ich gelernter Physiker und Penrose als Übersetzer seines Buchs »Computerdenken« durchaus gewogen bin, muss ich mich dieser Argumentation beugen. Die Erklärungslücke wird sich wohl nicht »da unten«, auf der Mikroebene der Quantenwelt, schließen, sondern klafft »hier oben«, auf dem makroskopischen Niveau neuronaler Netze. Wir müssen uns eben damit abfinden, dass unsere elementarsten Erlebnisse Produkt der komplexesten Prozesse überhaupt sind."
  15. Cornelius, I.: Information and Its philosophy (2004) 0.02 
    0.021089358 = product of:
  0.1476255 = sum of:
    0.1476255 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1476255 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Three problems in relation to Luciano Floridi's work on the Philosophy of Information (PI) and the relationship of PI to Library and Information Science (LIS) are considered: the claim that LIS is a materials-based discipline, Floridi's claim about Information as a message transfer system, and his downgrading of Social Epistemology to be a subset of PI. The recent history of LIS and the practice of professional library work are examined for evidence of the basis for making claims about LIS. A view of information based on individual interpretations is preferred to Floridi's account, which is found to be too innocent of LIS practice to be accepted without revision, as is his view of LIS as an applied PI.
  16. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.0210193 = product of:
  0.1471351 = sum of:
    0.1471351 = sum of:
      0.09659862 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09659862 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18058759 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.5349128 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.050536472 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050536472 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  17. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.02 
    0.020242441 = product of:
  0.07084854 = sum of:
    0.06326807 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06326807 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.23711035 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.0075804703 = product of:
      0.015160941 = sum of:
        0.015160941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015160941 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...
  18. Fidel, R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Cleal, B.; Bruce, H.: ¬A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction : a case study of collaborative information retrieval (2004) 0.02 
    0.018076593 = product of:
  0.12653615 = sum of:
    0.12653615 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12653615 = score(doc=2997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    While most research in the area of human-information behavior has focused an a single dimension-either the psychological or the social-this case study demonstrated the importance of a multidimensional approach. The Cognitive Work Analysis framework guided this field study of one event of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) carried out by design engineers at Microsoft, including observations and interviews. Various dimensions explained the motives for this CIR event and the challenges the participants encountered: the cognitive dimension, the specific task and decision, the organization of the teamwork, and the organizational culture. Even though it is difficult at times to separate one dimension from another, and all are interdependent, the analysis uncovered several reasons for design engineers to engage in CIR, such as when they are new to the organization or the team, when the information lends itself to various interpretations, or when most of the needed information is not documented. Similar multidimensional studies will enhance our understanding of human-information behavior.
  19. Egghe, L.: Zipfian and Lotkaian continuous concentration theory (2005) 0.02 
    0.018076593 = product of:
  0.12653615 = sum of:
    0.12653615 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12653615 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this article concentration (i.e., inequality) aspects of the functions of Zipf and of Lotka are studied. Since both functions are power laws (i.e., they are mathematically the same) it suffices to develop one concentration theory for power laws and apply it twice for the different interpretations of the laws of Zipf and Lotka. After a brief repetition of the functional relationships between Zipf's law and Lotka's law, we prove that Price's law of concentration is equivalent with Zipf's law. A major part of this article is devoted to the development of continuous concentration theory, based an Lorenz curves. The Lorenz curve for power functions is calculated and, based an this, some important concentration measures such as the ones of Gini, Theil, and the variation coefficient. Using Lorenz curves, it is shown that the concentration of a power law increases with its exponent and this result is interpreted in terms of the functions of Zipf and Lotka.
  20. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.02 
    0.018076593 = product of:
  0.12653615 = sum of:
    0.12653615 = weight(_text_:interpretations in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12653615 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26682967 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03730009 = queryNorm
        0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Analysis of user viewing and query-matching behavior furnishes additional evidence that the relevance of retrieved images for system users may arise from descriptions of objects and content-based elements that are not evident or not even present in the image. This investigation looks at how users assign pre-determined query terms to retrieved images, as well as looking at a post-retrieval process of image engagement to user cognitive assessments of meaningful terms. Additionally, affective/emotion-based query terms appear to be an important descriptive category for image retrieval. A system for capturing (eliciting) human interpretations derived from cognitive engagements with viewed images could further enhance the efficiency of image retrieval systems stemming from traditional indexing methods and technology-based content extraction algorithms. An approach to such a system is posited.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1311
  • m 213
  • el 88
  • s 71
  • x 40
  • b 27
  • i 9
  • r 6
  • n 5
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications