-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.09
0.09385974 = sum of:
0.08326228 = product of:
0.24978682 = sum of:
0.24978682 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24978682 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44444627 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.010597459 = product of:
0.021194918 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020)
0.06
0.06381081 = product of:
0.12762162 = sum of:
0.12762162 = sum of:
0.042389836 = weight(_text_:2 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042389836 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08523178 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 14:08:22
-
Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020)
0.05
0.053175673 = product of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324864 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.07102648 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07102648 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2020 22:15:11
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.2, S.12-17
-
Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023)
0.05
0.053175673 = product of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324864 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.07102648 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07102648 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 4.2023 13:34:09
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
-
Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022)
0.05
0.053175673 = product of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.106351346 = sum of:
0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324864 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.07102648 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07102648 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
18. 8.2022 19:22:57
-
Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020)
0.04
0.04254054 = product of:
0.08508108 = sum of:
0.08508108 = sum of:
0.028259892 = weight(_text_:2 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028259892 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056821186 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 19:04:22
-
Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022)
0.04
0.03722297 = product of:
0.07444594 = sum of:
0.07444594 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049718536 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 2.2023 14:30:22
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 75(2022) H.2, S.499-516
-
Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.04
0.03722297 = product of:
0.07444594 = sum of:
0.07444594 = sum of:
0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727406 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049718536 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:33:53
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.145-149
-
Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020)
0.04
0.036295015 = product of:
0.07259003 = sum of:
0.07259003 = sum of:
0.029974142 = weight(_text_:2 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029974142 = score(doc=5620,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 18:10:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.2, S.221-229
-
Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022)
0.04
0.035419054 = product of:
0.07083811 = sum of:
0.07083811 = sum of:
0.035324864 = weight(_text_:2 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035324864 = score(doc=1096,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-2/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-2?page=1.
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
18.11.2023 13:47:22
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.2, S.98 - 120
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.03
0.034692615 = product of:
0.06938523 = sum of:
0.06938523 = product of:
0.20815569 = sum of:
0.20815569 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20815569 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44444627 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.03
0.034692615 = product of:
0.06938523 = sum of:
0.06938523 = product of:
0.20815569 = sum of:
0.20815569 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20815569 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44444627 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Marcondes, C.H.: Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions (2020)
0.03
0.033052735 = product of:
0.06610547 = sum of:
0.06610547 = sum of:
0.030592233 = weight(_text_:2 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030592233 = score(doc=5757,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23629841 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
0.03551324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551324 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-2-122.
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
4. 3.2020 14:22:41
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.2, S.122-137
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 9.2014 19:19:40
6.10.2020 21:22:33
-
Park, Y.J.: ¬A socio-technological model of search information divide in US cities (2021)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.2 S.144-159
-
Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.219-233
-
Ma, Y.: Relatedness and compatibility : the concept of privacy in Mandarin Chinese and American English corpora (2023)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:59:40
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.249-272
-
Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023)
0.03
0.031905405 = product of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.06381081 = sum of:
0.021194918 = weight(_text_:2 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021194918 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04261589 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05242341 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:01:47
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.273-282
