-
Batt, C.: ¬The libraries of the future : public libraries and the Internet (1996)
0.16
0.16357747 = sum of:
0.06327313 = product of:
0.18981938 = sum of:
0.18981938 = weight(_text_:assess in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18981938 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.10030434 = sum of:
0.033316337 = weight(_text_:2 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033316337 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
0.066988006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066988006 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
- Abstract
- Considers the possible potential for service development in public libraries offered by the Internet and describes the traditional models of network access and their lack of relevance to public libraries. Describes 2 current research projects currently being undertaken by public libraries to assess the value of the Internet to their services; ITPOINT, a project being conducted at Chelmsley Wood Library, Solihull, UK; and CLIP, the Croydon Libraries Internet peoject. Presents a range of new service paradigms and suggests that public libraries will become even more central to people's lives than they are today
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-30
-
Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998)
0.16
0.16357747 = sum of:
0.06327313 = product of:
0.18981938 = sum of:
0.18981938 = weight(_text_:assess in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18981938 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.10030434 = sum of:
0.033316337 = weight(_text_:2 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033316337 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
0.066988006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066988006 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:07:29
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.15
0.15311535 = sum of:
0.08180009 = product of:
0.24540025 = sum of:
0.24540025 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24540025 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5239695 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.07131526 = sum of:
0.029447759 = weight(_text_:2 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029447759 = score(doc=3577,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.041867502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041867502 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993)
0.14
0.14313027 = sum of:
0.055363983 = product of:
0.16609195 = sum of:
0.16609195 = weight(_text_:assess in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16609195 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0877663 = sum of:
0.029151794 = weight(_text_:2 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029151794 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
0.058614504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058614504 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: How to assess a library information service
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 11(1993) no.2, S.40-42
-
Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006)
0.14
0.14313027 = sum of:
0.055363983 = product of:
0.16609195 = sum of:
0.16609195 = weight(_text_:assess in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16609195 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0877663 = sum of:
0.029151794 = weight(_text_:2 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029151794 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.058614504 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058614504 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
-
Bravo, B.R. -> Rodriguez Bravo, B.:
0.14
0.13581932 = product of:
0.27163863 = sum of:
0.27163863 = sum of:
0.07067462 = weight(_text_:2 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07067462 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.4630484 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
0.200964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.200964 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2007 19:43:53
- 2
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.13
0.12909602 = sum of:
0.114520125 = product of:
0.34356037 = sum of:
0.34356037 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34356037 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5239695 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014575897 = product of:
0.029151794 = sum of:
0.029151794 = weight(_text_:2 in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029151794 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
- Isbn
- 978-3-11-061738-2
-
Klauß, H.: SISIS : 10. Anwenderforum Berlin-Brandenburg (1999)
0.13
0.12805168 = product of:
0.25610337 = sum of:
0.25610337 = sum of:
0.06663267 = weight(_text_:2 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663267 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.1894707 = weight(_text_:22 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1894707 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 10:22:52
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 33(1999) H.2, S.346-348
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.12
0.1232806 = sum of:
0.0981601 = product of:
0.2944803 = sum of:
0.2944803 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2944803 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5239695 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0251205 = product of:
0.050241 = sum of:
0.050241 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050241 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017)
0.12
0.11861628 = sum of:
0.05592607 = product of:
0.16777821 = sum of:
0.16777821 = weight(_text_:assess in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16777821 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.4605288 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06269021 = sum of:
0.02082271 = weight(_text_:2 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02082271 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.041867502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041867502 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
- Abstract
- User-generated content is one of the most interesting phenomena of current published media, as users are now able not only to consume, but also to produce content in a much faster and easier manner. However, such freedom also carries concerns about content quality. In this work, we propose an automatic framework to assess the quality of collaboratively generated content. Quality is addressed as a multidimensional concept, modeled as a combination of independent assessments, each regarding different quality dimensions. Accordingly, we adopt a machine-learning (ML)-based multiview approach to assess content quality. We perform a thorough analysis of our framework on two different domains: Questions and Answer Forums and Collaborative Encyclopedias. This allowed us to better understand when and how the proposed multiview approach is able to provide accurate quality assessments. Our main contributions are: (a) a general ML multiview framework that takes advantage of different views of quality indicators; (b) the improvement (up to 30%) in quality assessment over the best state-of-the-art baseline methods; (c) a thorough feature and view analysis regarding impact, informativeness, and correlation, based on two distinct domains.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:04:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.286-308
-
Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999)
0.11
0.11204523 = product of:
0.22409046 = sum of:
0.22409046 = sum of:
0.058303587 = weight(_text_:2 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058303587 = score(doc=8727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
0.16578686 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16578686 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2001 12:22:47
- Source
- Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
-
Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996)
0.11
0.11204523 = product of:
0.22409046 = sum of:
0.22409046 = sum of:
0.058303587 = weight(_text_:2 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058303587 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.16578686 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16578686 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 9.1997 19:22:27
- Source
- Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.11
0.11065373 = sum of:
0.0981601 = product of:
0.2944803 = sum of:
0.2944803 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2944803 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5239695 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012493625 = product of:
0.02498725 = sum of:
0.02498725 = weight(_text_:2 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02498725 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Date
- 2. 1.2016 17:27:19
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.11
0.11065373 = sum of:
0.0981601 = product of:
0.2944803 = sum of:
0.2944803 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2944803 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5239695 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012493625 = product of:
0.02498725 = sum of:
0.02498725 = weight(_text_:2 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02498725 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.11
0.10760376 = sum of:
0.078296505 = product of:
0.2348895 = sum of:
0.2348895 = weight(_text_:assess in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2348895 = score(doc=4121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.029307252 = product of:
0.058614504 = sum of:
0.058614504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058614504 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
-
Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023)
0.11
0.10760376 = sum of:
0.078296505 = product of:
0.2348895 = sum of:
0.2348895 = weight(_text_:assess in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2348895 = score(doc=997,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.029307252 = product of:
0.058614504 = sum of:
0.058614504 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058614504 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:23:31
-
Martin, K.; Shilton, K.: Why experience matters to privacy : how context-based experience moderates consumer privacy expectations for mobile applications (2016)
0.10
0.10223592 = sum of:
0.039545707 = product of:
0.11863712 = sum of:
0.11863712 = weight(_text_:assess in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11863712 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06269021 = sum of:
0.02082271 = weight(_text_:2 in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02082271 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.041867502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041867502 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
- Abstract
- Two dominant theoretical models for privacy-individual privacy preferences and context-dependent definitions of privacy-are often studied separately in information systems research. This paper unites these theories by examining how individual privacy preferences impact context-dependent privacy expectations. The paper theorizes that experience provides a bridge between individuals' general privacy attitudes and nuanced contextual factors. This leads to the hypothesis that, when making judgments about privacy expectations, individuals with less experience in a context rely more on individual preferences such as their generalized privacy beliefs, whereas individuals with more experience in a context are influenced by contextual factors and norms. To test this hypothesis, 1,925 American users of mobile applications made judgments about whether varied real-world scenarios involving data collection and use met their privacy expectations. Analysis of the data suggests that experience using mobile applications did moderate the effect of individual preferences and contextual factors on privacy judgments. Experience changed the equation respondents used to assess whether data collection and use scenarios met their privacy expectations. Discovering the bridge between 2 dominant theoretical models enables future privacy research to consider both personal and contextual variables by taking differences in experience into account.
- Date
- 20. 7.2016 18:22:57
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.10
0.10223592 = sum of:
0.039545707 = product of:
0.11863712 = sum of:
0.11863712 = weight(_text_:assess in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11863712 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36431643 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06269021 = sum of:
0.02082271 = weight(_text_:2 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02082271 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.041867502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041867502 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
- Abstract
- Purpose Mendeley reader counts have been proposed as early indicators for the impact of academic publications. The purpose of this paper is to assess whether there are enough Mendeley readers for research evaluation purposes during the month when an article is first published. Design/methodology/approach Average Mendeley reader counts were compared to the average Scopus citation counts for 104,520 articles from ten disciplines during the second half of 2016. Findings Articles attracted, on average, between 0.1 and 0.8 Mendeley readers per article in the month in which they first appeared in Scopus. This is about ten times more than the average Scopus citation count. Research limitations/implications Other disciplines may use Mendeley more or less than the ten investigated here. The results are dependent on Scopus's indexing practices, and Mendeley reader counts can be manipulated and have national and seniority biases. Practical implications Mendeley reader counts during the month of publication are more powerful than Scopus citations for comparing the average impacts of groups of documents but are not high enough to differentiate between the impacts of typical individual articles. Originality/value This is the first multi-disciplinary and systematic analysis of Mendeley reader counts from the publication month of an article.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.2, S.174-183
-
Lynch, C.A.; Preston, C.M.: Describing and classifying networked information resources (1992)
0.10
0.10030434 = product of:
0.20060869 = sum of:
0.20060869 = sum of:
0.06663267 = weight(_text_:2 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663267 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
0.13397601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13397601 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Electronic networking: research, applications, and policy. 2(1992) no.1, S.10-22
-
Bauer, G.: Wissensdarstellung für eine effektive Mensch-Rechner-Interaktion (1985)
0.10
0.10030434 = product of:
0.20060869 = sum of:
0.20060869 = sum of:
0.06663267 = weight(_text_:2 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663267 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15262902 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
0.13397601 = weight(_text_:22 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13397601 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2164248 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06180335 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Rechentechnik/Datenverarbeitung. 22(1985) H.2, S.33-35
