Search (3942 results, page 1 of 198)

  1. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.29 
    0.28531513 = product of:
  0.57063025 = sum of:
    0.5181534 = weight(_text_:22th in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5181534 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.71033263 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.72945184 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.052476846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052476846 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Issue
    22th ed.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.18 
    0.1800311 = product of:
  0.3600622 = sum of:
    0.30758536 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30758536 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.052476846 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052476846 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.15 
    0.15379268 = product of:
  0.6151707 = sum of:
    0.6151707 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6151707 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001) 0.15 
    0.15328282 = product of:
  0.30656564 = sum of:
    0.24534266 = weight(_text_:assess in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24534266 = score(doc=4121,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
    Date
    28. 7.2006 20:09:22
  5. Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023) 0.15 
    0.15328282 = product of:
  0.30656564 = sum of:
    0.24534266 = weight(_text_:assess in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24534266 = score(doc=997,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:23:31
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.15 
    0.15002592 = product of:
  0.30005184 = sum of:
    0.25632113 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25632113 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.043730706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043730706 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Batt, C.: ¬The libraries of the future : public libraries and the Internet (1996) 0.13 
    0.13411796 = product of:
  0.26823592 = sum of:
    0.1982668 = weight(_text_:assess in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1982668 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
    0.06996913 = weight(_text_:22 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06996913 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the possible potential for service development in public libraries offered by the Internet and describes the traditional models of network access and their lack of relevance to public libraries. Describes 2 current research projects currently being undertaken by public libraries to assess the value of the Internet to their services; ITPOINT, a project being conducted at Chelmsley Wood Library, Solihull, UK; and CLIP, the Croydon Libraries Internet peoject. Presents a range of new service paradigms and suggests that public libraries will become even more central to people's lives than they are today
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-30
  8. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.13 
    0.13411796 = product of:
  0.26823592 = sum of:
    0.1982668 = weight(_text_:assess in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1982668 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
    0.06996913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06996913 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78
    Pages
    S.20-22
  9. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.13 
    0.13411796 = product of:
  0.26823592 = sum of:
    0.1982668 = weight(_text_:assess in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1982668 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    0.06996913 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06996913 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  10. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.13 
    0.13411796 = product of:
  0.26823592 = sum of:
    0.1982668 = weight(_text_:assess in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1982668 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
    0.06996913 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06996913 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reviews in detail an MA dissertation to assess the scope and value of electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities. Develops and demonstrates a model to determine essential and desirable indexing terms and to highlight some inherent complexities. Assesses features of commercially available databases against this model. Presents personal observations on the dissertation experience and on prospects for further research in this area
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
  11. Allen, B.L.: Designing information systems for user abilities and tasks : an experimental study (1998) 0.13 
    0.13138528 = product of:
  0.26277056 = sum of:
    0.21029371 = weight(_text_:assess in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21029371 = score(doc=2664,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5526346 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
    0.052476846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052476846 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    With the many choices that can be built into information systems, it is possible to customize such systems for users, based on the tasks that users are accomplishing, on the personal characteristics of users, or a combination of these factors. Reports results of an experiment which detailed logging of use of experimental information systems and was used to determine the optimal configuration of these systems for each user. 4 experimental systems were specially designed and all used a single database of 668 bibliographic records. Tasks were varied, and the cognitive abilities of users were tested to assess one important personal characteristic. Results showed that it was possible to create an optimal configuration to match the cognitive abilities of users, but that it was more difficult to assess which configuration was the best match for specific tasks. The person in task interaction proved to be the least powerful indicator of design configurations. These results suggest that usable information systems can be created for users by careful analysis of the interaction of design features with personal characteristics such as cognitive abilities
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.139-153
  12. Mundle, K.; Huie, H.; Bangalore, N.S.: ARL Library Catalog Department Web sites : an evaluative study (2006) 0.13 
    0.1291804 = product of:
  0.2583608 = sum of:
    0.21463011 = weight(_text_:assess in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21463011 = score(doc=771,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.5640303 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.043730706 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043730706 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    User-friendly and content-rich Web sites are indispensable for any knowledge-based organization. Web site evaluation studies point to ways to improve the efficiency and usability of Web sites. Library catalog or technical services department Web sites have proliferated in the past few years, but there is no systematic and accepted method that evaluates the performance of these Web sites. An earlier study by Mundle, Zhao, and Bangalore evaluated catalog department Web sites within the consortium of the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) libraries, proposed a model to assess these Web sites, and recommended desirable features for them. The present study was undertaken to test the model further and to assess the recommended features. The study evaluated the catalog department Web sites of Association of Research Libraries members. It validated the model proposed, and confirmed the use of the performance index (PI) as an objective measure to assess the usability or workability of a catalog department Web site. The model advocates using a PI of 1.5 as the benchmark for catalog department Web site evaluation by employing the study tool and scoring method suggested in this paper.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.13 
    0.12816057 = product of:
  0.51264226 = sum of:
    0.51264226 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.51264226 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  14. Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993) 0.12 
    0.117353216 = product of:
  0.23470643 = sum of:
    0.17348345 = weight(_text_:assess in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17348345 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: How to assess a library information service
  15. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.12 
    0.117353216 = product of:
  0.23470643 = sum of:
    0.17348345 = weight(_text_:assess in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17348345 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  16. Newman, D.J.; Block, S.: Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper (2006) 0.12 
    0.117353216 = product of:
  0.23470643 = sum of:
    0.17348345 = weight(_text_:assess in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17348345 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    We use a probabilistic mixture decomposition method to determine topics in the Pennsylvania Gazette, a major colonial U.S. newspaper from 1728-1800. We assess the value of several topic decomposition techniques for historical research and compare the accuracy and efficacy of various methods. After determining the topics covered by the 80,000 articles and advertisements in the entire 18th century run of the Gazette, we calculate how the prevalence of those topics changed over time, and give historically relevant examples of our findings. This approach reveals important information about the content of this colonial newspaper, and suggests the value of such approaches to a more complete understanding of early American print culture and society.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:32:00
  17. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.12 
    0.117353216 = product of:
  0.23470643 = sum of:
    0.17348345 = weight(_text_:assess in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17348345 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
    0.06122299 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06122299 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017) 0.11 
    0.10948773 = product of:
  0.21897545 = sum of:
    0.17524475 = weight(_text_:assess in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17524475 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3805294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.4605288 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
    0.043730706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043730706 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22605622 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    User-generated content is one of the most interesting phenomena of current published media, as users are now able not only to consume, but also to produce content in a much faster and easier manner. However, such freedom also carries concerns about content quality. In this work, we propose an automatic framework to assess the quality of collaboratively generated content. Quality is addressed as a multidimensional concept, modeled as a combination of independent assessments, each regarding different quality dimensions. Accordingly, we adopt a machine-learning (ML)-based multiview approach to assess content quality. We perform a thorough analysis of our framework on two different domains: Questions and Answer Forums and Collaborative Encyclopedias. This allowed us to better understand when and how the proposed multiview approach is able to provide accurate quality assessments. Our main contributions are: (a) a general ML multiview framework that takes advantage of different views of quality indicators; (b) the improvement (up to 30%) in quality assessment over the best state-of-the-art baseline methods; (c) a thorough feature and view analysis regarding impact, informativeness, and correlation, based on two distinct domains.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:04:22
  19. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.10 
    0.10252845 = product of:
  0.4101138 = sum of:
    0.4101138 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4101138 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  20. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.10 
    0.10252845 = product of:
  0.4101138 = sum of:
    0.4101138 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4101138 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.54728734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.064553745 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3323
  • m 355
  • el 175
  • s 142
  • b 40
  • x 36
  • i 23
  • r 21
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications