-
Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3.10.2000 20:48:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998)
0.02
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = product of:
0.0972076 = sum of:
0.0972076 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0972076 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
-
Weinheimer, J.: ¬A visual explanation of the areas defined by AACR2, RDA, ISBD, LC NAF, LC Classification, LC Subject Headings, Dewey Classification, MARC21 : plus a quick look at ISO2709, MARCXML and a version of BIBFRAME (2015)
0.02
0.020225393 = product of:
0.040450785 = sum of:
0.040450785 = product of:
0.08090157 = sum of:
0.08090157 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08090157 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.34583107 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This short publication was made for two reasons. First, to provide a simple way to help people understand a bit more precisely what is defined by RDA, AACR2, MARC format, and so on. In this way, when someone says that MARC, or AARC2, or ISBD should change, they will have a better idea of what each term does and does not pertain to. One record has been chosen at random and analysed in various ways. This publication is far from complete and does not pretend to teach anything, it only demonstrates. When someone talks about, e.g. MARC, all the reader needs to do is look at the colored areas to get an idea of what that means.
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.02
0.018226424 = product of:
0.03645285 = sum of:
0.03645285 = product of:
0.0729057 = sum of:
0.0729057 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0729057 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982)
0.02
0.018226424 = product of:
0.03645285 = sum of:
0.03645285 = product of:
0.0729057 = sum of:
0.0729057 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0729057 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 14:49:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.018226424 = product of:
0.03645285 = sum of:
0.03645285 = product of:
0.0729057 = sum of:
0.0729057 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0729057 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006)
0.02
0.016854495 = product of:
0.03370899 = sum of:
0.03370899 = product of:
0.06741798 = sum of:
0.06741798 = weight(_text_:e.g in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06741798 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.28819257 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a report by a group "charged to identify current trends that will have a direct impact on cataloging operations and to define possible new roles for the online catalog and cataloging staff at Indiana University." Their one general conclusion after nine months of work is that "The need for cataloging expertise within the I.U. Libraries will not be diminished in the coming years. Rather, catalogers of the future will work in the evolving environment of publishing, scholarly communication, and information technology in new expanded roles. Catalogers will need to be key players in addressing the many challenges facing the libraries and the overall management and organization of information at Indiana University." The report also identifies five strategic directions. The report is an interesting read, and taken with the explosion of related reports (e.g., Calhoun's report to the Library of Congress cited in this issue, the UC Bibliographic Services TF Report), adds yet another perspective to the kinds of changes we must foster to create better library services in a vastly changed environment.
-
Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009)
0.02
0.016854495 = product of:
0.03370899 = sum of:
0.03370899 = product of:
0.06741798 = sum of:
0.06741798 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06741798 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.28819257 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.02
0.016685098 = product of:
0.033370197 = sum of:
0.033370197 = product of:
0.06674039 = sum of:
0.06674039 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06674039 = score(doc=1172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.28529608 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.02
0.0151886875 = product of:
0.030377375 = sum of:
0.030377375 = product of:
0.06075475 = sum of:
0.06075475 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075475 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.02
0.0151886875 = product of:
0.030377375 = sum of:
0.030377375 = product of:
0.06075475 = sum of:
0.06075475 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075475 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.02
0.0151886875 = product of:
0.030377375 = sum of:
0.030377375 = product of:
0.06075475 = sum of:
0.06075475 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075475 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.01
0.014301512 = product of:
0.028603025 = sum of:
0.028603025 = product of:
0.05720605 = sum of:
0.05720605 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720605 = score(doc=1271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.2445395 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.01
0.012888029 = product of:
0.025776058 = sum of:
0.025776058 = product of:
0.051552117 = sum of:
0.051552117 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051552117 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.01
0.01215095 = product of:
0.0243019 = sum of:
0.0243019 = product of:
0.0486038 = sum of:
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
