-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.03
0.026933575 = product of:
0.05386715 = sum of:
0.05386715 = product of:
0.2154686 = sum of:
0.2154686 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2154686 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38338378 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022)
0.02
0.02205192 = product of:
0.04410384 = sum of:
0.04410384 = product of:
0.066155754 = sum of:
0.04456822 = weight(_text_:k in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04456822 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
0.021587534 = weight(_text_:h in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021587534 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020)
0.02
0.020822838 = product of:
0.041645676 = sum of:
0.041645676 = product of:
0.062468514 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper investigates how school teachers look for informational texts for their classrooms. Access to current, varied and authentic informational texts improves learning outcomes for K-12 students, but many teachers lack resources to expand and update readings. The Web offers freely available resources, but finding suitable ones is time-consuming. This research lays the groundwork for building tools to ease that burden. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports qualitative findings from a study in two stages: (1) a set of semistructured interviews, based on the critical incident technique, eliciting teachers' information-seeking practices and challenges; and (2) observations of teachers using a prototype teaching-oriented news search tool under a think-aloud protocol. Findings Teachers articulated different objectives and ways of using readings in their classrooms, goals and self-reported practices varied by experience level. Teachers struggled to formulate queries that are likely to return readings on specific course topics, instead searching directly for abstract topics. Experience differences did not translate into observable differences in search skill or success in the lab study. Originality/value There is limited work on teachers' information-seeking practices, particularly on how teachers look for texts for classroom use. This paper describes how teachers look for information in this context, setting the stage for future development and research on how to support this use case. Understanding and supporting teachers looking for information is a rich area for future research, due to the complexity of the information need and the fact that teachers are not looking for information for themselves.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.02
0.020822838 = product of:
0.041645676 = sum of:
0.041645676 = product of:
0.062468514 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.02
0.020822838 = product of:
0.041645676 = sum of:
0.041645676 = product of:
0.062468514 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.02
0.020822838 = product of:
0.041645676 = sum of:
0.041645676 = product of:
0.062468514 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
-
Kumpulainen, S.; Keskustalo, H.; Zhang, B.; Stefanidis, K.: Historical reasoning in authentic research tasks : mapping cognitive and document spaces (2020)
0.02
0.018901644 = product of:
0.03780329 = sum of:
0.03780329 = product of:
0.05670493 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=5621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0185036 = score(doc=5621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
McDonald, C.; Schmalz, M.; Monheim, A.; Keating, S.; Lewin, K.; Jin, C.; Lee, H.: Describing, organizing, and maintaining video game development artifacts (2021)
0.02
0.018901644 = product of:
0.03780329 = sum of:
0.03780329 = product of:
0.05670493 = sum of:
0.03820133 = weight(_text_:k in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03820133 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0185036 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020)
0.02
0.018421499 = product of:
0.036842998 = sum of:
0.036842998 = product of:
0.055264495 = sum of:
0.0185036 = weight(_text_:h in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0185036 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.036760893 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036760893 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 18:10:22
-
Walsh, J.A.; Cobb, P.J.; Fremery, W. de; Golub, K.; Keah, H.; Kim, J.; Kiplang'at, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Mahony, S.; Oh, S.G.; Sula, C.A.; Underwood, T.; Wang, X.: Digital humanities in the iSchool (2022)
0.02
0.01788038 = product of:
0.03576076 = sum of:
0.03576076 = product of:
0.05364114 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.021806704 = weight(_text_:h in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021806704 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Huvila, I.; Enwald, H.; Eriksson-Backa, K.; Liu, Y.-H.; Hirvonen, N.: Information behavior and practices research informing information systems design (2022)
0.02
0.01788038 = product of:
0.03576076 = sum of:
0.03576076 = product of:
0.05364114 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.021806704 = weight(_text_:h in 615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021806704 = score(doc=615,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 615, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=615)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhou, H.; Dong, K.; Xia, Y.: Knowledge inheritance in disciplines : quantifying the successive and distant reuse of references (2023)
0.02
0.01788038 = product of:
0.03576076 = sum of:
0.03576076 = product of:
0.05364114 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.021806704 = weight(_text_:h in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021806704 = score(doc=1192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How the knowledge base of disciplines grows, renews, and decays informs their distinct characteristics and epistemology. Here we track the evolution of knowledge bases of 19 disciplines for over 45 years. We introduce the notation of knowledge inheritance as the overlap in the set of references between years. We discuss two modes of knowledge inheritance of disciplines-successive and distant. To quantify the status and propensity of knowledge inheritance for disciplines, we propose two indicators: one descriptively describes knowledge base evolution, and one estimates the propensity of knowledge inheritance. When observing the continuity in knowledge bases for disciplines, we show distinct patterns for STEM and SS&H disciplines: the former inherits knowledge bases more successively, yet the latter inherits significantly from distant knowledge bases. We further discover stagnation or revival in knowledge base evolution where older knowledge base ceases to decay after 10 years (e.g., Physics and Mathematics) and are increasingly reused (e.g., Philosophy). Regarding the propensity of inheriting prior knowledge bases, we observe unanimous rises in both successive and distant knowledge inheritance. We show that knowledge inheritance could reveal disciplinary characteristics regarding the trajectory of knowledge base evolution and interesting insights into the metabolism and maturity of scholarly communication.
-
Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023)
0.02
0.017480262 = product of:
0.034960523 = sum of:
0.034960523 = product of:
0.05244078 = sum of:
0.021806704 = weight(_text_:h in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021806704 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:20:47
-
Koho, M.; Burrows, T.; Hyvönen, E.; Ikkala, E.; Page, K.; Ransom, L.; Tuominen, J.; Emery, D.; Fraas, M.; Heller, B.; Lewis, D.; Morrison, A.; Porte, G.; Thomson, E.; Velios, A.; Wijsman, H.: Harmonizing and publishing heterogeneous premodern manuscript metadata as Linked Open Data (2022)
0.02
0.01575137 = product of:
0.03150274 = sum of:
0.03150274 = product of:
0.047254108 = sum of:
0.03183444 = weight(_text_:k in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03183444 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhou, Q.; Lee, C.S.; Sin, S.-C.J.; Lin, S.; Hu, H.; Ismail, M.F.F. Bin: Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:05:27
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020)
0.01
0.013984209 = product of:
0.027968418 = sum of:
0.027968418 = product of:
0.041952625 = sum of:
0.017445361 = weight(_text_:h in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017445361 = score(doc=181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.024507262 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024507262 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
