Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Understandings of language and cognition : implications for classification research (1994) 0.01

0.012831721 = product of:
  0.025663443 = sum of:
    0.025663443 = product of:
      0.07699033 = sum of:
        0.07699033 = weight(_text_:r in 8884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07699033 = score(doc=8884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a

Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010) 0.01

0.0073324125 = product of:
  0.014664825 = sum of:
    0.014664825 = product of:
      0.043994475 = sum of:
        0.043994475 = weight(_text_:r in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043994475 = score(doc=3323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote: Erwiderung zu: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1076-1077.

Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01

0.0071799466 = product of:
  0.014359893 = sum of:
    0.014359893 = product of:
      0.043079678 = sum of:
        0.043079678 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043079678 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 21. 7.2006 14:11:22

Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01

0.0071799466 = product of:
  0.014359893 = sum of:
    0.014359893 = product of:
      0.043079678 = sum of:
        0.043079678 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043079678 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: S.22-36

Hjoerland, B.: ¬The phrase "information storage and retrieval" (IS&R) : an historical note (2015) 0.01

0.0064158607 = product of:
  0.012831721 = sum of:
    0.012831721 = product of:
      0.038495164 = sum of:
        0.038495164 = weight(_text_:r in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038495164 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01

0.006154239 = product of:
  0.012308478 = sum of:
    0.012308478 = product of:
      0.036925435 = sum of:
        0.036925435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036925435 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 17. 3.2011 19:22:55

Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01

0.0051285336 = product of:
  0.010257067 = sum of:
    0.010257067 = product of:
      0.0307712 = sum of:
        0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0307712 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 2.2013 11:49:13

Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01

0.0051285336 = product of:
  0.010257067 = sum of:
    0.010257067 = product of:
      0.0307712 = sum of:
        0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0307712 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01

0.0051285336 = product of:
  0.010257067 = sum of:
    0.010257067 = product of:
      0.0307712 = sum of:
        0.0307712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0307712 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 18.11.2023 13:47:22

Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.00
```
0.004582758 = product of:
  0.009165516 = sum of:
    0.009165516 = product of:
      0.027496547 = sum of:
        0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027496547 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Purpose - To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Spärck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of the Journal of Documentation celebration, "60 years of the best in information research". Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Sparck Jones as its starting-point. Analysis involves distinctions between "positivism" and "pragmatism" and "classical" versus Kuhnian understandings of concepts. Findings - Classification, both manual and automatic, for retrieval benefits from drawing upon a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, a consideration of theories of meaning, and the adding of top-down approaches to IR in which divisions of labour, domains, traditions, genres, document architectures etc. are included as analytical elements and in which specific IR algorithms are based on the examination of specific literatures. Introduces an example illustrating the consequences of a full implementation of a pragmatist understanding when handling homonyms. Practical implications - Outlines how to classify from a pragmatic-philosophical point of view. Originality/value - Provides, emphasizing a pragmatic understanding, insights of importance to classification for retrieval, both manual and automatic. - Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.319-332.

Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.00

0.004582758 = product of:
  0.009165516 = sum of:
    0.009165516 = product of:
      0.027496547 = sum of:
        0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027496547 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote: Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)

Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.00

0.004582758 = product of:
  0.009165516 = sum of:
    0.009165516 = product of:
      0.027496547 = sum of:
        0.027496547 = weight(_text_:r in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027496547 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.

Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993) 0.00

0.0042267814 = product of:
  0.008453563 = sum of:
    0.008453563 = product of:
      0.025360689 = sum of:
        0.025360689 = weight(_text_:d in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025360689 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type: d

Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002) 0.00

0.002749655 = product of:
  0.00549931 = sum of:
    0.00549931 = product of:
      0.016497929 = sum of:
        0.016497929 = weight(_text_:r in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016497929 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15036309 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00

0.0025642668 = product of:
  0.0051285336 = sum of:
    0.0051285336 = product of:
      0.0153856 = sum of:
        0.0153856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0153856 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590649 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 18:13:27

Schöpfel, J.; Farace, D.; Prost, H.; Zane, A.; Hjoerland, B.: Data documents (2021) 0.00

0.0018114777 = product of:
  0.0036229554 = sum of:
    0.0036229554 = product of:
      0.010868866 = sum of:
        0.010868866 = weight(_text_:d in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010868866 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Hjoerland, B.: Political versus apolitical epistemologies in knowledge organization (2020) 0.00

0.0015095649 = product of:
  0.0030191299 = sum of:
    0.0030191299 = product of:
      0.00905739 = sum of:
        0.00905739 = weight(_text_:d in 24) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00905739 = score(doc=24,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 24, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=24)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Part of a special issue: The politics of knowledge organization, Part 2; guest editors: Robert D. Montoya and Gregory H. Leazer. DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-6-461.

Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization (2003) 0.00
```
0.0012076519 = product of:
  0.0024153038 = sum of:
    0.0024153038 = product of:
      0.0072459113 = sum of:
        0.0072459113 = weight(_text_:d in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072459113 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.086298585 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04542337 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This article is organized in 10 sections: (1) Knowledge Organization (KO) is a wide interdisciplinary field, muck broader than Library and Information Science (LIS). (2) Inside LIS there have been many different approaches and traditions of KO with little mutual influence. These traditions have to a large extent been defined by new technology, for which reason the theoretical integration and underpinning has not been well considered. The most important technology-driven traditions are: a) Manual indexing and classification in libraries and reference works, b) Documentation and scientific communication, c) Information storage and retrieval by computers, d) Citation based KO and e) Full text, hypertext and Internet based approaches. These traditions taken together define very muck the special LIS focus an KO. For KO as a field of research it is important to establish a fruitful theoretical frame of reference for this overall field. This paper provides some suggestions. (3) One important theoretical distinction to consider is the one between social and intellectual forms of KO. Social forms of KO are related to professional training, disciplines and social groups while intellectual organization is related to concepts and theories in the fields to be organized. (4) The social perspective includes in addition the systems of genres and documents as well as the social system of knowledge Producers, knowledge intermediaries and knowledge users. (5) This social system of documents, genres and agents makes available a very complicated structure of potential subject access points (SAPs), which may be used in information retrieval (IR). The basic alm of research in KO is to develop knowledge an how to optimise this system of SAPs and its utilization in IR. (6) SAPs may be seen as signs, and their production and use may be understood from a social semiotic point of view. (7) The concept of paradigms is also helpful because different groups and interests tend to be organized according to a paradigm and to develop different criteria of relevance, and thus different criteria of likeliness in KO. (8) The basic unit in KO is the semantic relation between two concepts, and such relations are embedded in theories. (9) In classification like things are grouped together, but what is considered similar is not a trivial question. (10) The paper concludes with the considering of methods for KO. Basically the methods of any field are connected with epistemological theories. This is also the case with KO. The existing methods as described in the literature of KO fit into a classification of basic epistemological views. The debate about the methods of KO at the deepest level therefore implies an epistemological discussion.

Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes