Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.02
    0.016805485 = product of:
      0.03361097 = sum of:
        0.03361097 = sum of:
          0.0029551024 = weight(_text_:s in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029551024 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.030655868 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030655868 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1606-1618
  2. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.01
    0.014004571 = product of:
      0.028009143 = sum of:
        0.028009143 = sum of:
          0.0024625852 = weight(_text_:s in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0024625852 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.025546558 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025546558 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13205728 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03771094 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.740-752
  3. Mani, T.: Automatic summarization (2001) 0.00
    0.0024378353 = product of:
      0.0048756707 = sum of:
        0.0048756707 = product of:
          0.009751341 = sum of:
            0.009751341 = weight(_text_:s in 4076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009751341 = score(doc=4076,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 4076, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4076)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.5, S.410-411 (S.J. Lincicium)
    Pages
    285 S
  4. Craven, T.C.: Presentation of repeated phrases in a computer-assisted abstracting tool kit (2001) 0.00
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = product of:
          0.0068952385 = sum of:
            0.0068952385 = weight(_text_:s in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068952385 = score(doc=3667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.2, S.221-230
  5. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: SimSum : an empirically founded simulation of summarizing (2000) 0.00
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = product of:
          0.0068952385 = sum of:
            0.0068952385 = weight(_text_:s in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068952385 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.4, S.659-682
  6. Pinto, M.: Engineering the production of meta-information : the abstracting concern (2003) 0.00
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = product of:
          0.0068952385 = sum of:
            0.0068952385 = weight(_text_:s in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068952385 = score(doc=4667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.5, S.405-418
  7. Yusuff, A.: Automatisches Indexing and Abstracting : Grundlagen und Beispiele (2002) 0.00
    0.0017238096 = product of:
      0.0034476193 = sum of:
        0.0034476193 = product of:
          0.0068952385 = sum of:
            0.0068952385 = weight(_text_:s in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068952385 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    53 S
  8. Ye, S.; Chua, T.-S.; Kan, M.-Y.; Qiu, L.: Document concept lattice for text understanding and summarization (2007) 0.00
    0.0014775512 = product of:
      0.0029551024 = sum of:
        0.0029551024 = product of:
          0.0059102047 = sum of:
            0.0059102047 = weight(_text_:s in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059102047 = score(doc=941,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We argue that the quality of a summary can be evaluated based on how many concepts in the original document(s) that can be preserved after summarization. Here, a concept refers to an abstract or concrete entity or its action often expressed by diverse terms in text. Summary generation can thus be considered as an optimization problem of selecting a set of sentences with minimal answer loss. In this paper, we propose a document concept lattice that indexes the hierarchy of local topics tied to a set of frequent concepts and the corresponding sentences containing these topics. The local topics will specify the promising sub-spaces related to the selected concepts and sentences. Based on this lattice, the summary is an optimized selection of a set of distinct and salient local topics that lead to maximal coverage of concepts with the given number of sentences. Our summarizer based on the concept lattice has demonstrated competitive performance in Document Understanding Conference 2005 and 2006 evaluations as well as follow-on tests.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1643-1662
  9. Harabagiu, S.; Hickl, A.; Lacatusu, F.: Satisfying information needs with multi-document summaries (2007) 0.00
    0.0013930487 = product of:
      0.0027860973 = sum of:
        0.0027860973 = product of:
          0.0055721947 = sum of:
            0.0055721947 = weight(_text_:s in 939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0055721947 = score(doc=939,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 939, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1619-1642
  10. Liang, S.-F.; Devlin, S.; Tait, J.: Investigating sentence weighting components for automatic summarisation (2007) 0.00
    0.0012795969 = product of:
      0.0025591939 = sum of:
        0.0025591939 = product of:
          0.0051183878 = sum of:
            0.0051183878 = weight(_text_:s in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051183878 = score(doc=899,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.146-153
  11. Moens, M.F.: Automatic indexing and abstracting of document texts (2000) 0.00
    0.0012312926 = product of:
      0.0024625852 = sum of:
        0.0024625852 = product of:
          0.0049251704 = sum of:
            0.0049251704 = weight(_text_:s in 6892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049251704 = score(doc=6892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    400 S
  12. Hahn, U.: ¬Die Verdichtung textuellen Wissens zu Information : vom Wandel methodischer Paradigmen beim automatischen Abstracting (2004) 0.00
    0.0012312926 = product of:
      0.0024625852 = sum of:
        0.0024625852 = product of:
          0.0049251704 = sum of:
            0.0049251704 = weight(_text_:s in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049251704 = score(doc=4667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.51-68
  13. Lee, J.-H.; Park, S.; Ahn, C.-M.; Kim, D.: Automatic generic document summarization based on non-negative matrix factorization (2009) 0.00
    0.0012189177 = product of:
      0.0024378353 = sum of:
        0.0024378353 = product of:
          0.0048756707 = sum of:
            0.0048756707 = weight(_text_:s in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0048756707 = score(doc=2448,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.1, S.20-34
  14. Haag, M.: Automatic text summarization : Evaluation des Copernic Summarizer und mögliche Einsatzfelder in der Fachinformation der DaimlerCrysler AG (2002) 0.00
    0.0010447865 = product of:
      0.002089573 = sum of:
        0.002089573 = product of:
          0.004179146 = sum of:
            0.004179146 = weight(_text_:s in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004179146 = score(doc=649,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Diplomarbeit an der HBI Stuttgart. - Vgl. auch: nfd 53(2002) H.4, S.243-244
    Pages
    211 S
  15. Lam, W.; Chan, K.; Radev, D.; Saggion, H.; Teufel, S.: Context-based generic cross-lingual retrieval of documents and automated summaries (2005) 0.00
    0.0010447865 = product of:
      0.002089573 = sum of:
        0.002089573 = product of:
          0.004179146 = sum of:
            0.004179146 = weight(_text_:s in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004179146 = score(doc=1965,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.2, S.129-139
  16. Chen, H.-H.; Kuo, J.-J.; Huang, S.-J.; Lin, C.-J.; Wung, H.-C.: ¬A summarization system for Chinese news from multiple sources (2003) 0.00
    0.0010447865 = product of:
      0.002089573 = sum of:
        0.002089573 = product of:
          0.004179146 = sum of:
            0.004179146 = weight(_text_:s in 2115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004179146 = score(doc=2115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.13, S.1224-1236
  17. Deutsche Patentdatenbank mit maschinellen Abstract-Übersetzungen (2005) 0.00
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
      0.0019700683 = sum of:
        0.0019700683 = product of:
          0.0039401366 = sum of:
            0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 3344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039401366 = score(doc=3344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 2005, H.2, S.32
  18. Over, P.; Dang, H.; Harman, D.: DUC in context (2007) 0.00
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
      0.0019700683 = sum of:
        0.0019700683 = product of:
          0.0039401366 = sum of:
            0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039401366 = score(doc=934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1506-1520
  19. Sjöbergh, J.: Older versions of the ROUGEeval summarization evaluation system were easier to fool (2007) 0.00
    9.850342E-4 = product of:
      0.0019700683 = sum of:
        0.0019700683 = product of:
          0.0039401366 = sum of:
            0.0039401366 = weight(_text_:s in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039401366 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1500-1505
  20. Jones, S.; Paynter, G.W.: Automatic extractionof document keyphrases for use in digital libraries : evaluations and applications (2002) 0.00
    8.7065535E-4 = product of:
      0.0017413107 = sum of:
        0.0017413107 = product of:
          0.0034826214 = sum of:
            0.0034826214 = weight(_text_:s in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034826214 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04100075 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03771094 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.653-677

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 8

Types

  • a 44
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…