Search (95 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Lancaster, F.W.; Mills, J.: Testing indexes and index language devices : the ASLIB Cranfield project (1964) 0.03
    0.030291138 = product of:
      0.060582276 = sum of:
        0.060582276 = product of:
          0.09087341 = sum of:
            0.009524272 = weight(_text_:s in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009524272 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
            0.08134914 = weight(_text_:j in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08134914 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    American documentation. 15(1964), S.4-13
  2. White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.03
    0.029637037 = product of:
      0.059274074 = sum of:
        0.059274074 = sum of:
          0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002976335 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04557827 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025421606 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04557827 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.030876132 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030876132 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04557827 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 70(2014) no.3, S.307-329
  3. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.03
    0.028068244 = product of:
      0.05613649 = sum of:
        0.05613649 = product of:
          0.08420473 = sum of:
            0.010102016 = weight(_text_:s in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010102016 = score(doc=6158,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
            0.074102715 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074102715 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
    Pages
    166 S
  4. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.02
    0.01805465 = product of:
      0.0361093 = sum of:
        0.0361093 = product of:
          0.054163948 = sum of:
            0.004762136 = weight(_text_:s in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004762136 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
            0.049401812 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049401812 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  5. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.02
    0.015797818 = product of:
      0.031595636 = sum of:
        0.031595636 = product of:
          0.047393452 = sum of:
            0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004166869 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
            0.043226585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043226585 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  6. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.02
    0.015797818 = product of:
      0.031595636 = sum of:
        0.031595636 = product of:
          0.047393452 = sum of:
            0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004166869 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
            0.043226585 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043226585 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) no.1, S.67-76
  7. Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002) 0.02
    0.015145569 = product of:
      0.030291138 = sum of:
        0.030291138 = product of:
          0.045436706 = sum of:
            0.004762136 = weight(_text_:s in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004762136 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
            0.04067457 = weight(_text_:j in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04067457 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.49-65
  8. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01
    0.014034122 = product of:
      0.028068244 = sum of:
        0.028068244 = product of:
          0.042102367 = sum of:
            0.005051008 = weight(_text_:s in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005051008 = score(doc=3565,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
            0.037051357 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037051357 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.872-882
  9. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.013540987 = product of:
      0.027081974 = sum of:
        0.027081974 = product of:
          0.04062296 = sum of:
            0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035716018 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
            0.037051357 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037051357 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 32(2000) no.1, S.4-8
  10. Taghva, K.; Borsack, J.; Nartker, T.; Condit, A.: ¬The role of manually-assigned keywords in query expansion (2004) 0.01
    0.013252373 = product of:
      0.026504746 = sum of:
        0.026504746 = product of:
          0.039757118 = sum of:
            0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004166869 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
            0.03559025 = weight(_text_:j in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03559025 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.3, S.441-458
  11. Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.; Keen, M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems : ASLIB Cranfield research project (1966) 0.01
    0.011863417 = product of:
      0.023726834 = sum of:
        0.023726834 = product of:
          0.0711805 = sum of:
            0.0711805 = weight(_text_:j in 5363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0711805 = score(doc=5363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5363)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Braam, R.R.; Bruil, J.: Quality of indexing information : authors' views on indexing of their articles in chemical abstracts online CA-file (1992) 0.01
    0.0113591775 = product of:
      0.022718355 = sum of:
        0.022718355 = product of:
          0.034077533 = sum of:
            0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035716018 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
            0.03050593 = weight(_text_:j in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03050593 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 18(1992) no.5, S.399-408
  13. Westerman, S.J.; Cribbin, T.; Collins, J.: Human assessments of document similarity (2010) 0.01
    0.0113591775 = product of:
      0.022718355 = sum of:
        0.022718355 = product of:
          0.034077533 = sum of:
            0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035716018 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
            0.03050593 = weight(_text_:j in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03050593 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.8, S.1535-1542
  14. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.01
    0.011284156 = product of:
      0.022568312 = sum of:
        0.022568312 = product of:
          0.033852465 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
            0.030876132 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030876132 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.111-119
  15. Lu, K.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Toward effective automated weighted subject indexing : a comparison of different approaches in different environments (2018) 0.01
    0.009876927 = product of:
      0.019753855 = sum of:
        0.019753855 = product of:
          0.02963078 = sum of:
            0.0042091734 = weight(_text_:s in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042091734 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. das Erratum in JASIST 69(2018) no.7, S.956.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.121-133
  16. Rowley, J.: ¬The controlled versus natural indexing languages debate revisited : a perspective on information retrieval practice and research (1994) 0.01
    0.009465981 = product of:
      0.018931963 = sum of:
        0.018931963 = product of:
          0.028397942 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.2, S.108-119
  17. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.009465981 = product of:
      0.018931963 = sum of:
        0.018931963 = product of:
          0.028397942 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.287-300
  18. Qin, J.: Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database : an investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature (2000) 0.01
    0.009465981 = product of:
      0.018931963 = sum of:
        0.018931963 = product of:
          0.028397942 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 4386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=4386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4386)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 4386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=4386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4386)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.166-180
  19. Wolfram, D.; Zhang, J.: ¬An investigation of the influence of indexing exhaustivity and term distributions on a document space (2002) 0.01
    0.009465981 = product of:
      0.018931963 = sum of:
        0.018931963 = product of:
          0.028397942 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 5238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=5238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5238)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 5238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=5238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5238)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.944-952
  20. Lu, K.; Mao, J.: ¬An automatic approach to weighted subject indexing : an empirical study in the biomedical domain (2015) 0.01
    0.009465981 = product of:
      0.018931963 = sum of:
        0.018931963 = product of:
          0.028397942 = sum of:
            0.002976335 = weight(_text_:s in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002976335 = score(doc=4005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
            0.025421606 = weight(_text_:j in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025421606 = score(doc=4005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04557827 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.9, S.1776-1784

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 90
  • r 3
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…