Search (444 results, page 2 of 23)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.02 
    0.024097301 = product of:
  0.048194602 = sum of:
    0.048194602 = product of:
      0.0722919 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt a) die Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie zur qualitativen Wahrnehmung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, b) die Konstruktion eines daraus abgeleiteten Kriterienkatalogs zur Wahrnehmung der Qualität wissenschaftlicher Publikationen sowie c) der Überprüfung dieses Katalogs in qualitativen Interviews mit Wissenschaflterinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus dem Fachspektrum Chemie, Physik, Biologie, Materialwissenschaft und Engineering. Es zeigte sich, dass die Wahrnehmung von Qualität auf äußerlichen und von außen herangetragenen Faktoren, inhaltlichen / semantischen Faktoren und sprachlichen, syntaktischen sowie strukturellen Faktoren beruht.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.77-85
  2. Bräu, R.; Hofmann, K.; Nilson, S.; Zwilling-Seidenstücker, C.: #EveryNameCounts : Die Crowdsourcing-Initiative der Arolsen Archives (2021) 0.02 
    0.024097301 = product of:
  0.048194602 = sum of:
    0.048194602 = product of:
      0.0722919 = sum of:
        0.047599096 = weight(_text_:c in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047599096 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
        0.02469281 = weight(_text_:h in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02469281 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.177-184
  3. Hobohm, H.-C.: Theorien in der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.02 
    0.024068333 = product of:
  0.048136666 = sum of:
    0.048136666 = product of:
      0.072205 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
        0.030555792 = weight(_text_:h in 776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030555792 = score(doc=776,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 776, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=776)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die zentrale Frage in diesem Kapitel ist, welchen Einfluss Theoriediskussion, Theorieimport und Theoriebildung auf die Informationswissenschaft als Disziplin haben und ob es Theorieentwicklungen, d. h. also eigentlich Paradigmenwechsel gibt, die eine Richtung für ihre Weiterentwicklung geben können. Für eine Disziplin ist Theoretisieren so wichtig wie für einen Schachspieler das Überlegen seiner Spielstrategie (Hassan, Mathiassen & Lowry 2019, S. 200): "Wissenschaften entstehen dort, wo sie Theorien vonnöten haben." (Jahraus, 2011, S. 30) - denn sie decken nicht nur ihre Untersuchungsobjekte auf, sondern auch deren Bruchstellen und uneingestandenen Prämissen. Dieser Herausforderung sollte sich die Informationswissenschaft stellen.
  4. McDonald, C.; Schmalz, M.; Monheim, A.; Keating, S.; Lewin, K.; Jin, C.; Lee, H.: Describing, organizing, and maintaining video game development artifacts (2021) 0.02 
    0.023002025 = product of:
  0.04600405 = sum of:
    0.04600405 = product of:
      0.06900607 = sum of:
        0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050486468 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.022464063 = product of:
  0.044928126 = sum of:
    0.044928126 = product of:
      0.1797125 = sum of:
        0.1797125 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1797125 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38371542 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  6. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02 
    0.022464063 = product of:
  0.044928126 = sum of:
    0.044928126 = product of:
      0.1797125 = sum of:
        0.1797125 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1797125 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38371542 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  7. Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022) 0.02 
    0.021510338 = product of:
  0.043020677 = sum of:
    0.043020677 = product of:
      0.06453101 = sum of:
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
        0.042924806 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042924806 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 2.2023 14:30:22
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 75(2022) H.2, S.499-516
  8. Hubert, M.; Griesbaum, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Usability von Browsererweiterungen zum Schutz vor Tracking (2020) 0.02 
    0.02108514 = product of:
  0.04217028 = sum of:
    0.04217028 = product of:
      0.063255414 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.95-106
  9. Colombi, C.: Bibliothekarische Fachsystematiken am Deutschen Archäologischen Institut : 180 Jahre Wissensordnung (2023) 0.02 
    0.02108514 = product of:
  0.04217028 = sum of:
    0.04217028 = product of:
      0.063255414 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 74(2023) H.2/3, S.172-178
  10. Spannagel, C.: Hat ChatGPT eine Zukunft in der Mathematik? (2023) 0.02 
    0.02108514 = product of:
  0.04217028 = sum of:
    0.04217028 = product of:
      0.063255414 = sum of:
        0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041649207 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
        0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021606207 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.3, S.168-172
  11. Cox, A.; Fulton, C.: Geographies of information behaviour : a conceptual exploration (2022) 0.02 
    0.020136671 = product of:
  0.040273342 = sum of:
    0.040273342 = product of:
      0.06041001 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 6.2022 17:20:22
  12. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.02 
    0.020136671 = product of:
  0.040273342 = sum of:
    0.040273342 = product of:
      0.06041001 = sum of:
        0.029749434 = weight(_text_:c in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029749434 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  13. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.02 
    0.018437434 = product of:
  0.036874868 = sum of:
    0.036874868 = product of:
      0.0553123 = sum of:
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
        0.03679269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679269 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
  14. Cho, H.; Disher, T.; Lee, W.-C.; Keating, S.A.; Lee, J.H.: Facet analysis of anime genres : the challenges of defining genre information for popular cultural objects (2020) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5730)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Kang, L.; Tan, C.-H.: Do cognitive and affective expressions matter in purchase conversion? : a live chat perspective (2020) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Franke-Maier, M.; Beck, C.; Kasprzik, A.; Maas, J.F.; Pielmeier, S.; Wiesenmüller, H: ¬Ein Feuerwerk an Algorithmen und der Startschuss zur Bildung eines Kompetenznetzwerks für maschinelle Erschließung : Bericht zur Fachtagung Netzwerk maschinelle Erschließung an der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek am 10. und 11. Oktober 2019 (2020) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=5851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Sanfilippo, M.R.; Shvartzshnaider, Y.; Reyes, I.; Nissenbaum, H.; Egelman, S.: Disaster privacy/privacy disaster (2020) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=5960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5960)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Privacy expectations during disasters differ significantly from nonemergency situations. This paper explores the actual privacy practices of popular disaster apps, highlighting location information flows. Our empirical study compares content analysis of privacy policies and government agency policies, structured by the contextual integrity framework, with static and dynamic app analysis documenting the personal data sent by 15 apps. We identify substantive gaps between regulation and guidance, privacy policies, and information flows, resulting from ambiguities and exploitation of exemptions. Results also indicate gaps between governance and practice, including the following: (a) Many apps ignore self-defined policies; (b) while some policies state they "might" access location data under certain conditions, those conditions are not met as 12 apps included in our study capture location immediately upon initial launch under default settings; and (c) not all third-party data recipients are identified in policy, including instances that violate expectations of trusted third parties.
  18. Jetter, H.-C.: Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, usability und user experience (2023) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Jiang, Y.-C.; Li, H.: ¬The theoretical basis and basic principles of knowledge network construction in digital library (2023) 0.02 
    0.018072978 = product of:
  0.036145955 = sum of:
    0.036145955 = product of:
      0.05421893 = sum of:
        0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035699323 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
        0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018519606 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.02 
    0.017495383 = product of:
  0.034990765 = sum of:
    0.034990765 = product of:
      0.052486144 = sum of:
        0.021825567 = weight(_text_:h in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021825567 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
        0.030660577 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030660577 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15849307 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045260075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47

Authors

Languages

  • e 244
  • d 199
  • m 2
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 408
  • el 71
  • m 25
  • s 4
  • p 3
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications