-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005)
0.03
0.030655298 = product of:
0.061310597 = sum of:
0.061310597 = product of:
0.09196589 = sum of:
0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049390834 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.2007 19:55:22
- Source
- Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
-
Pimenov, E.N.: Normativnost' i nekotorye problem razrabotki tezauruzov i drugikh lingvistiicheskikh sredstv IPS (2000)
0.02
0.01663076 = product of:
0.03326152 = sum of:
0.03326152 = product of:
0.09978455 = sum of:
0.09978455 = weight(_text_:i in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09978455 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Burkart, M.: Thesaurus (2004)
0.02
0.01597808 = product of:
0.03195616 = sum of:
0.03195616 = product of:
0.047934234 = sum of:
0.02360563 = weight(_text_:c in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02360563 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
0.024328604 = weight(_text_:22 in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024328604 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Thesaurus als Dokumentationssprache wird in der DIN 1463-1in seinen wesentlichen Merkmalen beschrieben. Dort wird der Thesaurus im informationswissenschaftlichen Sinne so definiert: "Ein Thesaurus im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation ist eine geordnete Zusammenstellung von Begriffen und ihren (vorwiegend natürlichsprachigen) Bezeichnungen, die in einem Dokumentationsgebiet zum Indexieren, Speichern und Wiederauffinden dient. Er ist durch folgende Merkmale gekennzeichnet: a) Begriffe und Bezeichnungen werden eindeutig aufeinander bezogen ("terminologische Kontrolle"), indem - Synonyme möglichst vollständig erfasst werden, - Homonyme und Polyseme besonders gekennzeichnet werden, - für jeden Begriff eine Bezeichnung (Vorzugsbenennung, Begriffsnummer oder Notation) festgelegt wird, die den Begriff eindeutig vertritt, b) Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen (repräsentiert durch ihre Bezeichnungen) werden dargestellt." Diese Definition wäre zu ergänzen um folgende: c) Der Thesaurus ist präskriptiv, indem er für seinen Geltungsbereich festlegt, welche begrifflichen Einheiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden und durch welche Bezeichnungen diese repräsentiert werden. Im Folgenden sollen die wichtigsten Elemente und Prinzipien von Thesauri und die Thesaurusmethodik vorgestellt werden. Dies kann in diesem Rahmen nur auf eine sehr kursorische und allgemeine Art und Weise geschehen. Außerdem beschränkt sich die Darstellung auf den Thesauruseinsatz im klassischen Bereich von Information und Dokumentation. Auf die Behandlung von Spezialproblemen oder auf besondere Thesaurusformen (z.B. mehrsprachige Thesauri) kann hier nicht eingegangen werden, ebenso auf die erweiterten Anforderungen, die an Thesauri im Kontext von Wissensrepräsentation oder Hypertext zu stellen sind. Allerdings überschneidet sich der klassische IuD-Bereich zunehmend mit erweiterten Formen (etwa im Rahmen von Internetanwendungen). Da der Thesaurus im dokumentarischen Sinn alle Grundelemente des Thesaurusprinzips in klarer Form aufweist, wird dieser Bereich für eine Einführung gewählt. Für eine intensivere Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik wird die Lektüre von Wersig empfohlen, auf den sich auch die folgenden Ausführungen in weiten Teilen stützen. Eine weitere grundsätzliche Einführung in diesen Bereich, allerdings eher ausgerichtet auf die Spezifika des englischen Sprachraums, findet sich bei Lancaster.
- Date
- 5. 4.2013 10:18:22
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.01
0.012164302 = product of:
0.024328604 = sum of:
0.024328604 = product of:
0.07298581 = sum of:
0.07298581 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07298581 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.01
0.011802815 = product of:
0.02360563 = sum of:
0.02360563 = product of:
0.07081689 = sum of:
0.07081689 = weight(_text_:c in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07081689 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004)
0.01
0.010889656 = product of:
0.021779312 = sum of:
0.021779312 = product of:
0.06533793 = sum of:
0.06533793 = weight(_text_:i in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06533793 = score(doc=2362,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.38588926 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
According to my findings several relations available in the thesaurus query interface as "roles", are not used, i.e. there are not yet any assertions with them. And those which are used do not contribute to complete concept definitions of concepts which represent thesaurus main entries. In other words: The authors claim to already have a "description logic based nomenclature", where there is not yet one which deserves that title by being much more than a thesaurus with strict subsumption and additional inheritable semantic links. In the last section of the paper the authors say: "The most time consuming process in this conversion was making a careful analysis of the Thesaurus to understand the best way to translate it into OWL." "For other conversions, these same types of distinctions and decisions must be made. The expressive power of a proprietary encoding can vary widely from that in OWL or RDF. Understanding the original semantics and engineering a solution that most closely duplicates it is critical for creating a useful and accu-rate ontology." My question is: What decisions were made and are they exemplary, can they be rec-ommended as "the best way"? I raise strong doubts with respect to that, and I miss more profound discussions of the issues at stake. The following notes are dedicated to a critical description and assessment of the results of that conversion activity. They are written in a tutorial style more or less addressing students, but myself being a learner especially in the field of medical knowledge representation I do not speak "ex cathedra".
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.01
0.010136919 = product of:
0.020273838 = sum of:
0.020273838 = product of:
0.060821515 = sum of:
0.060821515 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060821515 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Stein, R.; Saro, C.: Online-Plattform für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006)
0.01
0.009835679 = product of:
0.019671358 = sum of:
0.019671358 = product of:
0.05901407 = sum of:
0.05901407 = weight(_text_:c in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05901407 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri (2006)
0.01
0.009736827 = product of:
0.019473653 = sum of:
0.019473653 = product of:
0.058420956 = sum of:
0.058420956 = weight(_text_:c in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058420956 = score(doc=2257,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Baca, M.: Fear of authority? : Authority control and thesaurus building for art and material culture information (2004)
0.01
0.008231806 = product of:
0.016463611 = sum of:
0.016463611 = product of:
0.049390834 = sum of:
0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049390834 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
-
Williamson, N.J.: Thesauri in the digital age : stability and dynamism in their development and use (2000)
0.01
0.007868543 = product of:
0.015737087 = sum of:
0.015737087 = product of:
0.04721126 = sum of:
0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721126 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Faceted thesauri (2008)
0.01
0.007868543 = product of:
0.015737087 = sum of:
0.015737087 = product of:
0.04721126 = sum of:
0.04721126 = weight(_text_:c in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04721126 = score(doc=1855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.007095843 = product of:
0.014191686 = sum of:
0.014191686 = product of:
0.042575058 = sum of:
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.01
0.007095843 = product of:
0.014191686 = sum of:
0.014191686 = product of:
0.042575058 = sum of:
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.007095843 = product of:
0.014191686 = sum of:
0.014191686 = product of:
0.042575058 = sum of:
0.042575058 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042575058 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Keränen, S.: Equivalence and focus of translation in multicultural thesaurus construction (2006)
0.01
0.006884975 = product of:
0.01376995 = sum of:
0.01376995 = product of:
0.04130985 = sum of:
0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04130985 = score(doc=237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Thesauri on the Web : current developments and trends (2000)
0.01
0.006884975 = product of:
0.01376995 = sum of:
0.01376995 = product of:
0.04130985 = sum of:
0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04130985 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schwartz, C.: Thesauri and facets and tags, Oh my! : a look at three decades in subject analysis (2008)
0.01
0.006884975 = product of:
0.01376995 = sum of:
0.01376995 = product of:
0.04130985 = sum of:
0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04130985 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:46:13
-
Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006)
0.01
0.006082151 = product of:
0.012164302 = sum of:
0.012164302 = product of:
0.036492907 = sum of:
0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036492907 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044891298 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
