Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.036990117 = sum of:
  0.020164127 = product of:
    0.080656506 = sum of:
      0.080656506 = weight(_text_:authors in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080656506 = score(doc=5276,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04967588 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01682599 = product of:
    0.03365198 = sum of:
      0.03365198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03365198 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04967588 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With the rapid proliferation of Internet technologies and applications, misuse of online messages for inappropriate or illegal purposes has become a major concern for society. The anonymous nature of online-message distribution makes identity tracing a critical problem. We developed a framework for authorship identification of online messages to address the identity-tracing problem. In this framework, four types of writing-style features (lexical, syntactic, structural, and content-specific features) are extracted and inductive learning algorithms are used to build feature-based classification models to identify authorship of online messages. To examine this framework, we conducted experiments on English and Chinese online-newsgroup messages. We compared the discriminating power of the four types of features and of three classification techniques: decision trees, backpropagation neural networks, and support vector machines. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach was able to identify authors of online messages with satisfactory accuracy of 70 to 95%. All four types of message features contributed to discriminating authors of online messages. Support vector machines outperformed the other two classification techniques in our experiments. The high performance we achieved for both the English and Chinese datasets showed the potential of this approach in a multiple-language context.

Date

22. 7.2006 16:14:37

0.0100955935 = product of:
  0.020191187 = sum of:
    0.020191187 = product of:
      0.040382374 = sum of:
        0.040382374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040382374 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2009 17:57:50

0.008554914 = product of:
  0.017109828 = sum of:
    0.017109828 = product of:
      0.06843931 = sum of:
        0.06843931 = weight(_text_:authors in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06843931 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With more than two billion pages created by millions of Web page authors and organizations, the World Wide Web is a tremendously rich knowledge base. The knowledge comes not only from the content of the pages themselves, but also from the unique characteristics of the Web, such as its hyperlink structure and its diversity of content and languages. Analysis of these characteristics often reveals interesting patterns and new knowledge. Such knowledge can be used to improve users' efficiency and effectiveness in searching for information an the Web, and also for applications unrelated to the Web, such as support for decision making or business management. The Web's size and its unstructured and dynamic content, as well as its multilingual nature, make the extraction of useful knowledge a challenging research problem. Furthermore, the Web generates a large amount of data in other formats that contain valuable information. For example, Web server logs' information about user access patterns can be used for information personalization or improving Web page design.

0.008412995 = product of:
  0.01682599 = sum of:
    0.01682599 = product of:
      0.03365198 = sum of:
        0.03365198 = weight(_text_:22 in 7469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365198 = score(doc=7469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

IEEE transactions on systems, man and cybernetics. 22(1992) no.5, S.865-884

0.008412995 = product of:
  0.01682599 = sum of:
    0.01682599 = product of:
      0.03365198 = sum of:
        0.03365198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365198 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2006 14:26:01

0.008412995 = product of:
  0.01682599 = sum of:
    0.01682599 = product of:
      0.03365198 = sum of:
        0.03365198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365198 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17395647 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2009 18:50:30

0.007129095 = product of:
  0.01425819 = sum of:
    0.01425819 = product of:
      0.05703276 = sum of:
        0.05703276 = weight(_text_:authors in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05703276 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As increasing numbers of non-English resources have become available on the Web, the interesting and important issue of how Web users can retrieve documents in different languages has arisen. Cross-language information retrieval (CLIP), the study of retrieving information in one language by queries expressed in another language, is a promising approach to the problem. Cross-language information retrieval has attracted much attention in recent years. Most research systems have achieved satisfactory performance on standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) collections such as news articles, but CLIR techniques have not been widely studied and evaluated for applications such as Web portals. In this article, the authors present their research in developing and evaluating a multilingual English-Chinese Web portal that incorporates various CLIP techniques for use in the business domain. A dictionary-based approach was adopted and combines phrasal translation, co-occurrence analysis, and pre- and posttranslation query expansion. The portal was evaluated by domain experts, using a set of queries in both English and Chinese. The experimental results showed that co-occurrence-based phrasal translation achieved a 74.6% improvement in precision over simple word-byword translation. When used together, pre- and posttranslation query expansion improved the performance slightly, achieving a 78.0% improvement over the baseline word-by-word translation approach. In general, applying CLIR techniques in Web applications shows promise.

0.007129095 = product of:
  0.01425819 = sum of:
    0.01425819 = product of:
      0.05703276 = sum of:
        0.05703276 = weight(_text_:authors in 6006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05703276 = score(doc=6006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22646311 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04967588 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 6006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6006)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that the ownership of related products that form a technology cluster is signifIcantly better than the attributes of an innovation at predicting adoption. The treatment of technology clusters, however, has been ad hoc and study specific: Researchers often make a priori assumptions about the relationships between technologies and measure ownership using lists of functionally related technology, without any systematic reasoning. Hence, the authors set out to examine empirically the composition of technology clusters and the differences, if any, in clusters of technologies formed by adopters and nonadopters. Using the Galileo system of multidimensional scaling and the associational diffusion framework, the dissimilarities between 30 technology concepts were scored by adopters and nonadopters. Results indicate clear differences in conceptualization of clusters: Adopters tend to relate technologies based an their functional similarity; here, innovations are perceived to be complementary, and hence, adoption of one technology spurs the adoption of related technologies. On the other hand, nonadopters tend to relate technologies using a stricter ascendancy of association where the adoption of an innovation makes subsequent innovations redundant. The results question the measurement approaches and present an alternative methodology.