Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Mayernik, M.S.; Acker, A.: Tracing the traces : the critical role of metadata within networked communications (2018) 0.01 
    0.011626059 = product of:
  0.034878176 = sum of:
    0.034878176 = product of:
      0.06975635 = sum of:
        0.06975635 = weight(_text_:networks in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06975635 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The information sciences have traditionally been at the center of metadata-focused research. The US National Security Agency (NSA) intelligence documents revealed by Edward Snowden in June of 2013 brought the term "metadata" into the public consciousness. Surprisingly little discussion in the information sciences has since occurred on the nature and importance of metadata within networked communication systems. The collection of digital metadata impacts the ways that people experience social and technical communication. Without such metadata, networked communication cannot exist. The NSA leaks, and numerous recent hacks of corporate and government communications, point to metadata as objects of new scholarly inquiry. If we are to engage in meaningful discussions about our digital traces, or make informed decisions about new policies and technologies, it is essential to develop theoretical and empirical frameworks that account for digital metadata. This opinion paper presents 5 key sociotechnical characteristics of metadata within digital networks that would benefit from stronger engagement by the information sciences.
  2. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.01 
    0.0109611545 = product of:
  0.03288346 = sum of:
    0.03288346 = product of:
      0.06576692 = sum of:
        0.06576692 = weight(_text_:networks in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576692 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.29562 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    LCSH
    Semantic networks (Information theory)
    Subject
    Semantic networks (Information theory)
  3. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.01 
    0.010620959 = product of:
  0.031862877 = sum of:
    0.031862877 = product of:
      0.063725755 = sum of:
        0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063725755 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.01 
    0.010620959 = product of:
  0.031862877 = sum of:
    0.031862877 = product of:
      0.063725755 = sum of:
        0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063725755 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  5. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.01 
    0.010620959 = product of:
  0.031862877 = sum of:
    0.031862877 = product of:
      0.063725755 = sum of:
        0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063725755 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  6. Fidler, B.; Acker, A.: Metadata, infrastructure, and computer-mediated communication in historical perspective (2017) 0.01 
    0.009688382 = product of:
  0.029065145 = sum of:
    0.029065145 = product of:
      0.05813029 = sum of:
        0.05813029 = weight(_text_:networks in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05813029 = score(doc=3346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this paper we describe the creation and use of metadata on the early Arpanet as part of normal network function. By using the Arpanet Host-Host Protocol and its sockets as an entry point for studying the generation of metadata, we show that the development and function of key Arpanet infrastructure can be studied by examining the creation and stabilization of metadata. More specifically, we use the Host-Host Protocol's sockets as an example of something that, at the level of the network, functions as both network infrastructure and metadata simultaneously. By presenting the function of sockets in tandem with an overview of the Host-Host Protocol, we argue for the further integrated study of infrastructure and metadata. Finally, we reintroduce the concept of infradata to refer specifically to data that locate data throughout an infrastructure and are required by the infrastructure to function, separating them from established and stabilized standards. We argue for the future application of infradata as a concept for the study of histories and political economies of networks, bridging the largely library and information science (LIS) study of metadata with the largely science and technology studies (STS) domain of infrastructure.
  7. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.01 
    0.008496767 = product of:
  0.0254903 = sum of:
    0.0254903 = product of:
      0.0509806 = sum of:
        0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509806 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  8. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.01 
    0.008496767 = product of:
  0.0254903 = sum of:
    0.0254903 = product of:
      0.0509806 = sum of:
        0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509806 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
  9. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01 
    0.0074346713 = product of:
  0.022304013 = sum of:
    0.022304013 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044608027 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.01 
    0.0074346713 = product of:
  0.022304013 = sum of:
    0.022304013 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044608027 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  11. Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017) 0.01 
    0.0074346713 = product of:
  0.022304013 = sum of:
    0.022304013 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044608027 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
  12. Baker, T.: Dublin Core Application Profiles : current approaches (2010) 0.01 
    0.0063725756 = product of:
  0.019117726 = sum of:
    0.019117726 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235452 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  13. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.01 
    0.0063725756 = product of:
  0.019117726 = sum of:
    0.019117726 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235452 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019) 0.01 
    0.0063725756 = product of:
  0.019117726 = sum of:
    0.019117726 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235452 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:22:49
  15. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.01 
    0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
  16. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.01 
    0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  17. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.01 
    0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  18. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.00 
    0.0042483835 = product of:
  0.01274515 = sum of:
    0.01274515 = product of:
      0.0254903 = sum of:
        0.0254903 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0254903 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.

Authors

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 1

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications