Search (327 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Resources Management"
  1. Integrated information systems (1992) 0.06
    0.062044926 = product of:
      0.16545314 = sum of:
        0.06049911 = weight(_text_:use in 6064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06049911 = score(doc=6064,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47845137 = fieldWeight in 6064, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6064)
        0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 6064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015778005 = score(doc=6064,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 6064, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6064)
        0.08917602 = product of:
          0.17835204 = sum of:
            0.17835204 = weight(_text_:computers in 6064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17835204 = score(doc=6064,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.82149017 = fieldWeight in 6064, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    COMPASS
    Management / Information / Use of / Computers
    Subject
    Management / Information / Use of / Computers
  2. Johnston, S.: Training for the information economy : a study of the information culture of a graduate business school (1999) 0.05
    0.049815115 = product of:
      0.1328403 = sum of:
        0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021389665 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.017640345 = weight(_text_:of in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017640345 = score(doc=192,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.0938103 = sum of:
          0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022070529 = score(doc=192,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.07173977 = weight(_text_:line in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07173977 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    As the corporate world becomes increasingly entwined with technological change and information systems, it is vital to examine the role of the information intermediary within such a context. The role of the trained information professional intermediary, whether a reference librarian, special librarian, on-line searcher or researcher, come under continual scrutiny as the corporate world undergoes radical transformation. This paper reports on a study which examines the role of the information professional within the library of a major academic business library. It has been observed that Wall Street functions almost entirely on information (Baldwin & Rice, 1997). Technology and the increasing need for a global perspective have challenged traditional corporate assumptions as the task of the contemporary business employee increasingly demands obtaining and working with information. In business environments, where the overriding goal is the economic progress of the company, information seeking must take place in rapidly changing, complex situations. The new business professional is not just someone familiar with the latest in management techniques. It is someone able to obtain, absorb and synthesize relevant information.
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  3. Mußler, G.; Reiterer, H.; Mann, T.M.: INSYDER - Information Retrieval aspects of a business intelligence system (2000) 0.05
    0.046692185 = product of:
      0.09338437 = sum of:
        0.04338471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04338471 = score(doc=5487,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
        0.014968331 = weight(_text_:of in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968331 = score(doc=5487,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
        0.009363732 = product of:
          0.018727465 = sum of:
            0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018727465 = score(doc=5487,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit INSYDER, einem visuell unterstützten Suchsystem im Umfeld der sogenannten Business Intelligence Systeme. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrags in der Erläuterung der Information Retrieval- und Visualisierungsaspekte zur Unterstützung des Suchprozesses im WWW. Vorgestellt wird das Rankingverfahren, das Interaktive Relevance Feedback sowie die Beschreibung der Unterstützung des Benutzers bei der Formulierung der Suchanfrage mittels Visualisierung.
    Content
    This paper presents a visual information seeking system for the WWW called INSYDER. The aim of INSYDER is to find business information from the WWW. Information seeking - especially on the Web - is an imprecise process. Information seekers often have only a fuzzy understanding of how they can get the information they want. This paper focuses on the use of information retrieval and visualisation techniques of the INSYDER system to support the user in extracting information from the WWW, namely in formulating queries, refining and reviewing results
  4. Van Slype, G.: ¬Les systèmes intégrés de gestion de l'information documentaire dans les enterprises (1989) 0.05
    0.045794785 = product of:
      0.09158957 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
        0.024696484 = weight(_text_:of in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024696484 = score(doc=2840,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Until the 1980s, the handling of documentary information in business was usually split up among 4 unrelated independent departments: the library; archives; secretarial services; and reproduction/printing. The introduction of new technology allows the integration of these operations into a single system; comprising subsystems for: production of internal documents; acquisition and storage of external documents; information retrieval; archive creation and maintenance; and circulation of information between departments, based on local computer networks. In reality, not many businesses are making use of technology available to set up such integrated systems because of the lack of common standards for equipment and software, which makes internal and external communication unreliable. This problem may be resolved in the near future, as a result of discussions now in progress at international level.
  5. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.04
    0.043977253 = product of:
      0.117272675 = sum of:
        0.016090471 = weight(_text_:of in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016090471 = score(doc=2346,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2491759 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.08999251 = sum of:
          0.008828212 = weight(_text_:on in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008828212 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.097201325 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.08116429 = weight(_text_:line in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08116429 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.35049015 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.0111897 = product of:
          0.0223794 = sum of:
            0.0223794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0223794 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.6, S.842-876
  6. Wijnhoven. F.; Wognum, P.M.; Weg, R.L.W. van de: Knowledge ontology development (1996) 0.04
    0.04278637 = product of:
      0.08557274 = sum of:
        0.020873476 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020873476 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.037047986 = weight(_text_:use in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037047986 = score(doc=907,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29299045 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.013664153 = weight(_text_:of in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013664153 = score(doc=907,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
        0.013987125 = product of:
          0.02797425 = sum of:
            0.02797425 = weight(_text_:22 in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02797425 = score(doc=907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge-containing documents and data about knowledge have been handled in stable environments by bureaucratic systems using very stable knowledge ontologies. These systems, though not always very effective in such environments, will become highly ineffective in environments where knowledge has to be updated and replaced frequently. Moreover, organizations in such dynamic environments also use knowledge from extemal resources extensively. This makes the development of a stable ontology for knowledge storage and retrieval particularly complicated. This paper describes eight context classes of knowledge ontology development and explores elements of a method for ontology development. These classes are based an the differences in contexts defined along three dimensions: knowledge dynamics, complexity and social dispersion. Ontology development matches these contexts and ontology needs defined by (logical and social) structure and ontology maturity. The classification framework and methodology are applied to two cases. The first case illustrates a descriptive use of our framework to characterize ontology development in an academic environment. The second case illustrates a normative use of our framework. The method proposed seemed to be empirically valid and rich and be useful for detecting options for ontology improvement.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  7. Kwasnik, B.H.; Liu, X.: Classification structures in the changing environment of active commercial websites : the case of eBay.com (2000) 0.04
    0.039252672 = product of:
      0.078505345 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.021168415 = weight(_text_:of in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021168415 = score(doc=122,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on a portion of a larger ongoing project. We address the issues of information organization and retrieval in large, active commercial websites. More specifically, we address the use of classification for providing access to the contents of such sites. We approach this analysis by describing the functionality and structure of the classification scheme of one such representative, large, active, commercial websites: eBay.com, a web-based auction site for millions of users and items. We compare eBay's classification scheme with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, which is a tool for describing and providing access to material culture.
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  8. DeRoure, D.: ¬An open framework for collaborative distributed information management (1998) 0.04
    0.038957454 = product of:
      0.07791491 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=3557,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=3557,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The MEMOIR project supports researchers working with a vast quantity of distributed information, by assisting them in finding both relevant documents and researchers with related interests. It is an open architecture based on the existing Web infrastructure. Key to the architecture is the use of proxies: to support message routing for dynamic reconfiguration and extension of the system, to collect information about the trail of documents that a user visits, and to insert links on the fly. Presents the MEMOIR framework and its rationale, and discusses early experiences with the system
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  9. Handbook on electronic commerce (2000) 0.04
    0.038572714 = product of:
      0.15429085 = sum of:
        0.008925388 = weight(_text_:of in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008925388 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
        0.14536546 = sum of:
          0.030581824 = weight(_text_:on in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030581824 = score(doc=820,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11478364 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The world is undergoing a revolution to a digital economy, with pronounced implications for corporate strategy, marketing, operations, information systems, customer services, global supply-chain management, and product distribution. This handbook examines the aspects of electronic commerce (e-commerce), including electronic storefront, on-line business, consumer interface, business-to-business networking, digital payment, legal issues, information product development, and electronic business models
    Series
    International handbooks on information systems
  10. Currie, W.L.: Organizational structure and the use of information technology : preliminary findings of a survey in the private and public sector (1996) 0.04
    0.03735762 = product of:
      0.07471524 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=4547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=4547,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=4547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=4547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines several contextual factors relating to IT and organizational structure in private and public organizations. They include organization size; finance and accounting for IT; and management roles and responsibilities. A Questionnaire survey was sent to a random sample of public and private sector organizations ranging from local authorities, NHS trusts, banks, building societies and manufacturing firms. preliminary findings suggests that organizational restructuring is often implemented through ad hoc managerial strategies triggered by financial imparatives. Whilst IT plays a part in the restructuring process, complex environmental and internal influences on organization structure and IT make over generalizations highly problematic. This is irrespective of the sector in which the organization operates
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:46:16
    Source
    International journal of information management. 16(1996) no.1, S.51-64
  11. Kirk, J.: Managers' use of information : a grounded theory approach (1997) 0.04
    0.035006173 = product of:
      0.0933498 = sum of:
        0.05927678 = weight(_text_:use in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05927678 = score(doc=318,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.4687847 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
        0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025244808 = score(doc=318,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of managers of organizations, to explore their understanding of information and the crucial value of information to their work roles. Describes and explains their actual use of information
    Source
    Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland. Ed.: P. Vakkari u.a
  12. Webb, S.P.: Know how : the hidden information asset (1996) 0.03
    0.030315762 = product of:
      0.08084203 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=6410,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=6410,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
        0.012484977 = product of:
          0.024969954 = sum of:
            0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024969954 = score(doc=6410,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature and use of individual knowledge and experience ('know how') as part of the corporate information resource. Looks at the reasons for taking a more formal approach to such information, drawing on author's research in British legal firms. Considers the impact of 'know how' systems on the future direction and style of library and information provision, and the role and responsibilities of LIS practitioners in their development, operation and use
  13. Edwards, S.L.; Ewers, B.: Business information : five key findings of a survey (1998) 0.03
    0.030315695 = product of:
      0.080841854 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 2490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=2490,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 2490, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2490)
        0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 2490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023614356 = score(doc=2490,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 2490, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2490)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 2490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=2490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports 5 key results of a questionnaire survey comparing the use of internal and external information services by business persons in the City of Brisbane, Queensland. The 'Business information: an investigation of its sources and use survey' was undertaken on behalf of Queensland University of Technology Library's (QUT) Expert Information Service. The survey aimed to determine where and how business information is currently sourced, how often and why information is sought from any particular source and any problems users have in finding business information
  14. Kelly, S.; Nicholas, D.: Is the business cybrarian a reality? : Internet use in business libraries (1996) 0.03
    0.0296588 = product of:
      0.07909013 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 6592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=6592,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 6592, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6592)
        0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 6592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021862645 = score(doc=6592,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6592, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6592)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 6592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=6592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the results of a survey of 36 banking and finance institutions in the UK on their information professionals' use of the Internet as a source of business information. The survey revealed that less than a third are currently using the Internet. Discusses the disadvantages and advantages of the Internet both as an information source and in terms of management. At the moment the Internet is a complementary information source although in the future it may become an entry-point to other information sources
  15. Butcher, H.: Why don't managers use information? (1997) 0.03
    0.028154349 = product of:
      0.075078264 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=633,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=633,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Lack of use by managers of what are deemed to be valuable information sources is a cause of considerable worry to library and information (LIS) staff. Argues that problems of underutilization are more fundamental that user ignorance or stubbornness and that the LIS profession needs to provide itself with accurate, up to date, relevant and comprehensive information on managers in order to update and improve service provision to this sector
  16. Haley, B.J.; Watson, H.J.: Using Lotus Notes in executive information systems (1996) 0.03
    0.027426984 = product of:
      0.073138624 = sum of:
        0.04277933 = weight(_text_:use in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04277933 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
        0.019324033 = weight(_text_:of in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019324033 = score(doc=4765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
        0.0110352645 = product of:
          0.022070529 = sum of:
            0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022070529 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the use of Lotus Notes groupware for executive information systems (EIS). Explains the functions that it offers and how they compensate for the weaknesses of existing EIS software. Reports on a survey of companies using Lotus Notes in EIS carries out in USA and Canada
  17. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: Critical notes on the use of knowledge in knowledge management (1996) 0.03
    0.027426984 = product of:
      0.073138624 = sum of:
        0.04277933 = weight(_text_:use in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04277933 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
        0.019324033 = weight(_text_:of in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019324033 = score(doc=5178,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
        0.0110352645 = product of:
          0.022070529 = sum of:
            0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022070529 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  18. Jurisica, I.: Knowledge organization by systematic knowledge management and discovery (2000) 0.03
    0.027346756 = product of:
      0.07292468 = sum of:
        0.051335193 = weight(_text_:use in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051335193 = score(doc=120,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40597942 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.014968331 = weight(_text_:of in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968331 = score(doc=120,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    We need to use dynamic knowledge organization approaches in order to facilitate effective access and use of domain knowledge. Although there are many approaches to knowledge organization available, it is a challenge to systematically organize evolving domains, because it is not feasible to rely only on humans to create relationships among individual knowledge sources. Additional problems arise because knowledge may not be consistently and completely described, and quality control may not always be in place in distributed knowledge environments. In this article we describe a generic approach to knowledge organization by using systematic knowledge management and applying knowledge-discovery techniques. We use a case-based reasoning system, called TA3, as a core component for knowledge management. Application of symbolic knowledge-discovery component of TA3 supports three main tasks: system optimization, knowledge evolution and evidence creation. To explain advantages of this approach, we use our experience from biomedical domains
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  19. Analytische Informationssysteme : Data Warehouse, On-Line Analytical Processing, Data Mining (1999) 0.03
    0.025089853 = product of:
      0.20071882 = sum of:
        0.20071882 = sum of:
          0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026759097 = score(doc=1381,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.17395972 = weight(_text_:line in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17395972 = score(doc=1381,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7512068 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Neben den operativen Informationssystemen, welche die Abwicklung des betrieblichen Tagesgeschäftes unterstützen, treten heute verstärkt Informationssysteme für analytische Aufgaben der Fach- und Führungskräfte in den Vordergrund. In fast allen Unternehmen werden derzeit Begriffe und Konzepte wie Data Warehouse, On-Line Analytical Processing und Data Mining diskutiert und die zugehörigen Produkte evaluiert. Vor diesem Hintergrund zielt der vorliegende Sammelband darauf ab, einen aktuellen Überblick über Technologien, Produkte und Trends zu bieten. Als Entscheidungsgrundlage für den Praktiker beim Aufbau und Einsatz derartiger analytischer Informationssysteme können die unterschiedlichen Beiträge aus Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft wertvolle Hilfestellung leisten.
    Content
    Grundlagen.- Data Warehouse.- On-line Analytical Processing.- Data Mining.- Betriebswirtschaftliche und strategische Aspekte.
  20. Tolis, C.: Business modelling for understanding and change : a conceptual framework of model work (1996) 0.02
    0.02461537 = product of:
      0.065640986 = sum of:
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023188837 = score(doc=660,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
        0.016784549 = product of:
          0.033569098 = sum of:
            0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033569098 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    In companies, people often work together in order to understand and change the business. Some of this is explicitly considered development work, with a focus an working for tomorrow. A common element of much development work - whether implicit or explicit - is the use of various types of models. In model work, there are a number of differences that affect the process and outcome of co-operative development work. Drawing an theories of signs, learning, and knowledge, this paper develops a conceptual framework of model work. The framework examines differences and alternatives within three areas: models, activities, and basic assumptions. Recognition and exploration of a larger part of the framework are suggested as important means to utilising the differences to facilitate understanding and change within the company.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers

Years

Languages

  • e 268
  • d 51
  • nl 2
  • sp 2
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 247
  • m 61
  • s 32
  • r 3
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects