Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.04
    0.044282272 = product of:
      0.088564545 = sum of:
        0.088564545 = sum of:
          0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04637436 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042190183 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  2. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.04
    0.036901895 = product of:
      0.07380379 = sum of:
        0.07380379 = sum of:
          0.0386453 = weight(_text_:services in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0386453 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03515849 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  3. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.02812679 = product of:
      0.05625358 = sum of:
        0.05625358 = product of:
          0.11250716 = sum of:
            0.11250716 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11250716 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  4. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.02461094 = product of:
      0.04922188 = sum of:
        0.04922188 = product of:
          0.09844376 = sum of:
            0.09844376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09844376 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  5. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.02461094 = product of:
      0.04922188 = sum of:
        0.04922188 = product of:
          0.09844376 = sum of:
            0.09844376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09844376 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  6. Pomerantz, J.: ¬A linguistic analysis of question taxonomies (2005) 0.02
    0.019128447 = product of:
      0.038256895 = sum of:
        0.038256895 = product of:
          0.07651379 = sum of:
            0.07651379 = weight(_text_:services in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07651379 = score(doc=3465,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent work in automatic question answering has called for question taxonomies as a critical component of the process of machine understanding of questions. There is a long tradition of classifying questions in library reference services, and digital reference services have a strong need for automation to support scalability. Digital reference and question answering systems have the potential to arrive at a highly fruitful symbiosis. To move towards this goal, an extensive review was conducted of bodies of literature from several fields that deal with questions, to identify question taxonomies that exist in these bodies of literature. In the course of this review, five question taxonomies were identified, at four levels of linguistic analysis.
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017579244 = product of:
      0.03515849 = sum of:
        0.03515849 = product of:
          0.07031698 = sum of:
            0.07031698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07031698 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  8. Kuhlthau, C.C.; Tama, S.L.: Information search process of lawyers : a call for 'just for me' information services (2001) 0.02
    0.016733907 = product of:
      0.033467814 = sum of:
        0.033467814 = product of:
          0.06693563 = sum of:
            0.06693563 = weight(_text_:services in 4492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06693563 = score(doc=4492,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 4492, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported in this paper is part of a programme of ongoing research based on the model of the Information Search Process (ISP) developed in a series of prior studies by Kuhlthau. This study sought to gain a better understanding of the variety of tasks that involve lawyers as a particular group of information workers, how they use information to accomplish their work, and the role mediators play in their process of information seeking and use. Findings revealed that these lawyers frequently were involved in complex tasks that required a constructive process of interpreting, learning and creating. To accomplish these complex tasks, they preferred printed texts over computer databases primarily because computer databases required well-specified requests and did not offer an option for examining a wide range of information at one time. These lawyers called for an active potential role for mediators in 'just for me' services. 'Just for me' services would encompass designing systems to provide a wider range of access more compatible with the process of construction, applying and developing principles of classification that would offer a more uniform system for organising and accessing files, and providing direction in filtering the overwhelming amount of information available on electronic resources.
  9. Makulowich, J.S.: 10 tips on managing your Internet searching (1995) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Offers 10 tips for finding information on the Internet. Define the area and level of expertise. Require end users to complete a request form defining the query. Categorize the Internat in lay terms for casual users. Establich a realistic time for retrieving results. Adopt a disciplined, systematic approach to the search. Understand the operating platform and the major tools available. Maintain a file of important services and addresses and users. Develop bookmarks and home pages. Learn shortcuts. Participate in the Internet Hunt (a monthly series of questions that allows searchers to practice and perfect search skills)
  10. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper proposes three different kinds of science models as value-added services that are integrated in the retrieval process to enhance retrieval quailty. The paper discusses the approaches Search Term Recommendation, Bradfordizing and Author Centrality on a general level and addresses implementation issues of the models within a real-life retrieval environment.
  11. Spink, A.; Ozmultu, H.C.: Characteristics of question format web queries : an exploratory study (2002) 0.01
    0.013663176 = product of:
      0.027326353 = sum of:
        0.027326353 = product of:
          0.054652706 = sum of:
            0.054652706 = weight(_text_:services in 3910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054652706 = score(doc=3910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 3910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Web queries in question format are becoming a common element of a user's interaction with Web search engines. Web search services such as Ask Jeeves - a publicly accessible question and answer (Q&A) search engine - request users to enter question format queries. This paper provides results from a study examining queries in question format submitted to two different Web search engines - Ask Jeeves that explicitly encourages queries in question format and the Excite search service that does not explicitly encourage queries in question format. We identify the characteristics of queries in question format in two different data sets: (1) 30,000 Ask Jeeves queries and 15,575 Excite queries, including the nature, length, and structure of queries in question format. Findings include: (1) 50% of Ask Jeeves queries and less than 1% of Excite were in question format, (2) most users entered only one query in question format with little query reformulation, (3) limited range of formats for queries in question format - mainly "where", "what", or "how" questions, (4) most common question query format was "Where can I find ..." for general information on a topic, and (5) non-question queries may be in request format. Overall, four types of user Web queries were identified: keyword, Boolean, question, and request. These findings provide an initial mapping of the structure and content of queries in question and request format. Implications for Web search services are discussed.
  12. Whitmire, E.: Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior (2002) 0.01
    0.013525856 = product of:
      0.027051711 = sum of:
        0.027051711 = product of:
          0.054103423 = sum of:
            0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054103423 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study applied the Biglan model of disciplinary differences to the information-seeking behavior patterns of 5,175 undergraduates responding to questions on the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ). The Biglan model categorizes academic disciplines along three dimensions: (1) hard-soft, (2) pure-applied, and (3) life-nonlife systems. Using t-tests, this model proved to be valid for distinguishing differences in undergraduates' information-seeking behavior patterns among various academic disciplines. The results indicate that the Biglan model has implications for the redesign of academic library services and use as a valid theoretical framework for future library and information science research.
  13. Lee, H.-L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword : two cultural perspectives (2006) 0.01
    0.013525856 = product of:
      0.027051711 = sum of:
        0.027051711 = product of:
          0.054103423 = sum of:
            0.054103423 = weight(_text_:services in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054103423 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study explored how people in two different cultures conduct two types of subject searches. Twenty-four American students and 40 Taiwanese students were given the same task looking for answers on the Internet by navigating through directories and by using keywords in the American-based Yahoo services. The findings pointed to differences between the groups due to their familiarity with the English language. On the other hand, presumed cultural differences did not seem to result in different search behaviors or preferences. These findings were preliminary and suggestions for future research were made.
  14. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  15. Choi, Y.: Effects of contextual factors on image searching on the Web (2010) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research examined college students' image searching processes on the Web. The study's objective was to collect empirical data on students' search needs and identify what contextual factors had a significant influence on their image searching tactics. While confirming common search behaviors such as Google-dominant use, short queries, rare use of advanced search options, and checking few search result pages, the findings also revealed a significantly different effect of contextual factors on the tactics of querying and navigating, performance, and relevance judgment. In particular, interaction activities were differentiated by task goals, level of searching expertise, and work task stages. The results suggested that context-sensitive services and interface features would better suit Web users' actual needs and enhance their searching experience.
  16. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  17. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  18. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  19. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  20. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22