-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = product of:
0.101684004 = sum of:
0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101684004 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = product of:
0.101684004 = sum of:
0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101684004 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = product of:
0.101684004 = sum of:
0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101684004 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = product of:
0.101684004 = sum of:
0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101684004 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.0111216875 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = product of:
0.0889735 = sum of:
0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0889735 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000)
0.01
0.010478289 = product of:
0.041913155 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.01
0.008987681 = product of:
0.035950724 = sum of:
0.035950724 = product of:
0.07190145 = sum of:
0.07190145 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07190145 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.01
0.007944062 = product of:
0.03177625 = sum of:
0.03177625 = product of:
0.0635525 = sum of:
0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0635525 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.01
0.0063552503 = product of:
0.025421001 = sum of:
0.025421001 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050842002 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
-
Fayen, E.G.: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies : a revision of ANSI/NISO Z39.19 for the 21st century (2007)
0.01
0.005887897 = product of:
0.023551589 = sum of:
0.023551589 = product of:
0.047103178 = sum of:
0.047103178 = weight(_text_:management in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047103178 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.0055608437 = product of:
0.022243375 = sum of:
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.00
0.003972031 = product of:
0.015888125 = sum of:
0.015888125 = product of:
0.03177625 = sum of:
0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03177625 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.00
0.0031869179 = product of:
0.012747671 = sum of:
0.012747671 = product of:
0.025495343 = sum of:
0.025495343 = weight(_text_:management in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025495343 = score(doc=2294,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.16125548 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
