-
Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022)
0.05
0.050100517 = product of:
0.10020103 = sum of:
0.10020103 = sum of:
0.05067079 = weight(_text_:technology in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05067079 = score(doc=547,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article discusses how letters to the editor boost publishing metrics for journals and authors, and then examines letters published since 2015 in six elite journals, including the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. The initial findings identify some potentially anomalous use of letters and unusual self-citation patterns. The article proposes that Clarivate Analytics consider slightly reconfiguring the Journal Impact Factor to more fairly account for letters and that journals transparently explain their letter submission policies.
- Date
- 6. 4.2022 19:22:26
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.702-707
-
Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.04
0.04267995 = product of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:33:53
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.145-149
-
Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023)
0.04
0.04267995 = product of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:23:31
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.866-878
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.04
0.041473467 = product of:
0.082946934 = sum of:
0.082946934 = product of:
0.2488408 = sum of:
0.2488408 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2488408 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.442763 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021)
0.04
0.03985323 = product of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.044327714 = weight(_text_:technology in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044327714 = score(doc=180,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose This investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied. Findings The intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option. Research limitations/implications This study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way. Originality/value This study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.04
0.03985323 = product of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.044327714 = weight(_text_:technology in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044327714 = score(doc=998,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
-
Aspray, W.; Aspray, P.: Does technology really outpace policy, and does it matter? : a primer for technical experts and others (2023)
0.04
0.03985323 = product of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.044327714 = weight(_text_:technology in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044327714 = score(doc=1017,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=1017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reconsiders the outpacing argument, the belief that changes in law and other means of regulation cannot keep pace with recent changes in technology. We focus on information and communication technologies (ICTs) in and of themselves as well as applied in computer science, telecommunications, health, finance, and other applications, but our argument applies also in rapidly developing technological fields such as environmental science, materials science, and genetic engineering. First, we discuss why the outpacing argument is so closely associated with information and computing technologies. We then outline 12 arguments that support the outpacing argument, by pointing to some particular weaknesses of policy making, using the United States as the primary example. Then arguing in the opposite direction, we present 4 brief and 3 more extended criticisms of the outpacing thesis. The paper's final section responds to calls within the technical community for greater engagement of policy and ethical concerns and reviews the paper's major arguments. While the paper focuses on ICTs and policy making in the United States, our critique of the outpacing argument and our exploration of its complex character are of utility to actors in other political contexts and in other technical fields.
- Date
- 22. 7.2023 13:28:28
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.8, S.885-904
-
Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 18:10:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.2, S.221-229
-
Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 9.2021 13:22:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.219-233
-
Ma, Y.: Relatedness and compatibility : the concept of privacy in Mandarin Chinese and American English corpora (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:59:40
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.249-272
-
Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:01:47
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.273-282
-
Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:29
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.383-387
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.415-433
-
Kuehn, E.F.: ¬The information ecosystem concept in information literacy : a theoretical approach and definition (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 11:52:50
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.434-443
-
Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:06:55
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.476-490
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
-
Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2023 13:51:47
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1170-1184
-
Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021)
0.04
0.035786085 = product of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036193423 = score(doc=263,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- When people experience major life changes, this often impacts their self-presentation, networks, and online behavior in substantial ways. To effectively study major life transitions and events, we surveyed a large U.S. sample (n = 554) to create the Major Life Events Taxonomy, a list of 121 life events in 12 categories. We then applied this taxonomy to a second large U.S. survey sample (n = 775) to understand on average how much social readjustment each event required, how likely each event was to be shared on social media with different types of audiences, and how much online network separation each involved. We found that social readjustment is positively correlated with sharing on social media, with both broad audiences and close ties as well as in online spaces separate from one's network of known ties. Some life transitions involve high levels of sharing with both separate audiences and broad audiences on social media, providing evidence for what previous research has called social media as social transition machinery. Researchers can use the Major Life Events Taxonomy to examine how people's life transition experiences relate to their behaviors, technology use, and health and well-being outcomes.
- Date
- 10. 6.2021 19:22:47
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.7, S.933-947
-
Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023)
0.04
0.035786085 = product of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036193423 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:43:02
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.186-204
