Search (159 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Hottenrott, H.; Rose, M.E.; Lawson, C.: ¬The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia (2021) 0.03 
    0.033233996 = product of:
  0.16616999 = sum of:
    0.16616999 = sum of:
      0.1396363 = weight(_text_:rose in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1396363 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31465015 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03916811 = queryNorm
          0.4437827 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.026533691 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026533691 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13716005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03916811 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.
  2. Wu, P.F.; Vitak, J.; Zimmer, M.T.: ¬A contextual approach to information privacy research (2020) 0.03 
    0.032091897 = product of:
  0.16045947 = sum of:
    0.16045947 = weight(_text_:m.t in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16045947 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28506732 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.5628827 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Biagetti, M.T.: Ontologies as knowledge organization systems (2021) 0.03 
    0.032091897 = product of:
  0.16045947 = sum of:
    0.16045947 = weight(_text_:m.t in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16045947 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28506732 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.5628827 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Han, K.; Rezapour, R.; Nakamura, K.; Devkota, D.; Miller, D.C.; Diesner, J.: ¬An expert-in-the-loop method for domain-specific document categorization based on small training data (2023) 0.02 
    0.023155265 = product of:
  0.11577632 = sum of:
    0.11577632 = weight(_text_:d.c in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11577632 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28650925 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.4040928 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.314861 = idf(docFreq=79, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Nguyen-Kim, M.T.: ¬Die kleinste gemeinsame Wirklichkeit : wahr, falsch, plausibel? : die größten Streitfragen wissenschaftlich geprüft (2021) 0.02 
    0.018338224 = product of:
  0.09169112 = sum of:
    0.09169112 = weight(_text_:m.t in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09169112 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28506732 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.32164726 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2780466 = idf(docFreq=82, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Ilhan, A.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.: Data privacy-related behavior and concerns of activity tracking technology users from Germany and the USA (2021) 0.01 
    0.014586629 = product of:
  0.036466572 = sum of:
    0.023199726 = weight(_text_:u in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199726 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
    0.013266846 = product of:
      0.026533691 = sum of:
        0.026533691 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026533691 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13716005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03916811 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose This investigation aims to examine the differences and similarities between activity tracking technology users from two regions (the USA and Germany) in their intended privacy-related behavior. The focus lies on data handling after hypothetical discontinuance of use, data protection and privacy policy seeking, and privacy concerns. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected through an online survey in 2019. In order to identify significant differences between participants from Germany and the USA, the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied. Findings The intensity of several privacy-related concerns was significantly different between the two groups. The majority of the participants did not inform themselves about the respective data privacy policies or terms and conditions before installing an activity tracking application. The majority of the German participants knew that they could request the deletion of all their collected data. In contrast, only 35% out of 68 participants from the US knew about this option. Research limitations/implications This study intends to raise awareness about managing the collected health and fitness data after stopping to use activity tracking technologies. Furthermore, to reduce privacy and security concerns, the involvement of the government, companies and users is necessary to handle and share data more considerably and in a sustainable way. Originality/value This study sheds light on users of activity tracking technologies from a broad perspective (here, participants from the USA and Germany). It incorporates not only concerns and the privacy paradox but (intended) user behavior, including seeking information on data protection and privacy policy and handling data after hypothetical discontinuance of use of the technology.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Detlor, B.; Julien, H.; Rose, T. La; Serenko, A.: Community-led digital literacy training : toward a conceptual framework (2022) 0.01 
    0.0139636295 = product of:
  0.06981815 = sum of:
    0.06981815 = product of:
      0.1396363 = sum of:
        0.1396363 = weight(_text_:rose in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1396363 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31465015 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03916811 = queryNorm
            0.4437827 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  8. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.01 
    0.0139636295 = product of:
  0.06981815 = sum of:
    0.06981815 = product of:
      0.1396363 = sum of:
        0.1396363 = weight(_text_:rose in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1396363 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31465015 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03916811 = queryNorm
            0.4437827 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 73(2022) no.10, S.1506-1509 (Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo).
  9. P-L-U-R-V : das sind die häufigsten Methoden der Desinformation. Neue Infografik im Posterformat (2020) 0.01 
    0.012858595 = product of:
  0.064292975 = sum of:
    0.064292975 = weight(_text_:u in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064292975 = score(doc=70,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.5012949 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://www.klimafakten.de/meldung/p-l-u-r-v-dies-sind-die-haeufigsten-desinformations-tricks-von-wissenschafts-leugnern.
    Source
    https://www.klimafakten.de/meldung/p-l-u-r-v-das-sind-die-haeufigsten-methoden-der-desinformation-neue-infografik-im
  10. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.01 
    0.010498998 = product of:
  0.052494988 = sum of:
    0.052494988 = weight(_text_:u in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052494988 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Wiesenmüller, H.: Formale Erschließung (2023) 0.01 
    0.009643946 = product of:
  0.04821973 = sum of:
    0.04821973 = weight(_text_:u in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04821973 = score(doc=784,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Bei der formalen Erschließung bzw. Formalerschließung, die auch als formale Analyse, formale Erfassung, Formalbeschreibung oder (Formal-)Katalogisierung bezeichnet wird, "werden Ressourcen gemäß festgelegten Regeln nach äußerlichen, formalen Kriterien beschrieben und auffindbar gemacht". Diese Ressourcen können alle Arten von physischen und digitalen Objekten sein, die z. B. in Bibliotheken, Archiven, Museen oder Dokumentationsstellen gesammelt oder verzeichnet werden. Formale Aspekte bei einem gedruckten Buch sind u. a. der*die Autor*in, der Titel, der Verlag, das Erscheinungsdatum, der Umfang und die ISBN. Bei einer Skulptur sind es u. a. der*die Künstler*in, das Entstehungsdatum, Werkstoff und Technik, die Maße und die Besitzgeschichte. Bei einem im Internet zur Verfügung gestellten digitalen Foto sind es u. a. der*die Fotograf*in, der Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme und die Koordinaten des Aufnahmeorts, technische Daten zur Aufnahme (z. B. Belichtungszeit), der Dateiname, das Dateiformat und die Dateigröße sowie die URL und ggf. ein Persistent Identifier (z. B. DOI oder URN).
  12. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.01 
    0.0093314005 = product of:
  0.046657003 = sum of:
    0.046657003 = product of:
      0.18662801 = sum of:
        0.18662801 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18662801 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33206767 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03916811 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  13. Dirnagl, U.: Kulturwandel in der Biomedizin (2020) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Fechler, H.-U.: ¬Eine üble Macht (2020) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 5791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=5791,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5791, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5791)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Madisch, I.; Blumenthal, U.: Wie das Coronavirus die Wissenschaftswelt dynamisiert : [12.05.2020]. (2020) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Herb, U.: ¬Das wissenschaftliche Publikations- und Reputationssystem ist gehackt (2020) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=5958,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Balakrishnan, U,; Soergel, D.; Helfer, O.: Representing concepts through description logic expressions for knowledge organization system (KOS) mapping (2020) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Habermas, J.: Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit : ¬Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? Hrsg.: M. Seeliger u. S. Sevignani (2021) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  19. Reimer, U.: Einführung in die Wissensorganisation (2023) 0.01 
    0.009279891 = product of:
  0.04639945 = sum of:
    0.04639945 = weight(_text_:u in 779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04639945 = score(doc=779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=779)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Babcock, K.; Lee, S.; Rajakumar, J.; Wagner, A.: Providing access to digital collections (2020) 0.01 
    0.008036621 = product of:
  0.040183105 = sum of:
    0.040183105 = weight(_text_:u in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040183105 = score(doc=5855,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12825379 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03916811 = queryNorm
        0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The University of Toronto Libraries is currently reviewing technology to support its Collections U of T service. Collections U of T provides search and browse access to 375 digital collections (and over 203,000 digital objects) at the University of Toronto Libraries. Digital objects typically include special collections material from the university as well as faculty digital collections, all with unique metadata requirements. The service is currently supported by IIIF-enabled Islandora, with one Fedora back end and multiple Drupal sites per parent collection (see attached image). Like many institutions making use of Islandora, UTL is now confronted with Drupal 7 end of life and has begun to investigate a migration path forward. This article will summarise the Collections U of T functional requirements and lessons learned from our current technology stack. It will go on to outline our research to date for alternate solutions. The article will review both emerging micro-service solutions, as well as out-of-the-box platforms, to provide an overview of the digital collection technology landscape in 2019. Note that our research is focused on reviewing technology solutions for providing access to digital collections, as preservation services are offered through other services at the University of Toronto Libraries.

Authors

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 63
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 135
  • el 32
  • m 13
  • s 7
  • p 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications