Search (203 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Franci, L.; Lucarelli, A.; Motta, M.; Rolle, M.: ¬The Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus : structural features and Web application projects (2011) 0.10
    0.10053201 = product of:
      0.13404268 = sum of:
        0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007327141 = score(doc=1808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
        0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579115 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
        0.040924385 = product of:
          0.08184877 = sum of:
            0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08184877 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
    Type
    a
  2. Bélair, J.-A.; Bourdon, F.; Mingam, M.: ¬Le Répertoire de vedettes-matière et RAMEAU : deux langages d'indexation en français : un luxe nécessaire (2005) 0.09
    0.08900407 = product of:
      0.17800814 = sum of:
        0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007771606 = score(doc=4359,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.17023653 = weight(_text_:et in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17023653 = score(doc=4359,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.82293165 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Deux langages d'indexation (le RVM Laval et Rameau) pour une seule langue (le français) : n'y a-t-il pas là un paradoxe et, d'une certaine manière, un luxe inutile ? Nous allons nous efforcer de démontrer le contraire en présentant les deux types de raisons qui expliquent cette nécessité, raisons d'ordre linguistique et culturel, d'une part, et raisons d'ordre administratif et de gestion, d'autre part. Cette autonomie assumée des deux langages ne signifie pas cependant qu'ils s'ignorent, tout au contraire. L'esprit de collaboration qui anime les deux institutions est soutenu par une coopération officialisée ainsi que par une coopération de tous les jours.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Series
    139 SI - Classification et Indexation avec Catalogage ; 145-F
    Type
    a
  3. Jahns, Y.: 20 years SWD : German subject authority data prepared for the future (2011) 0.08
    0.075399004 = product of:
      0.100532 = sum of:
        0.0054953555 = weight(_text_:a in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054953555 = score(doc=1802,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file - SWD - provides a terminologically controlled vocabulary, covering all fields of knowledge. The subject headings are determined by the German Rules for the Subject Catalogue. The authority file is produced and updated daily by participating libraries from around Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Over the last twenty years, it grew to an online-accessible database with about 550.000 headings. They are linked to other thesauri, also to French and English equivalents and with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification. Thus, it allows multilingual access and searching in dispersed, heterogeneously indexed catalogues. The vocabulary is not only used for cataloguing library materials, but also web-resources and objects in archives and museums.
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
    Type
    a
  4. Steeg, F.; Pohl, A.: ¬Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) (2021) 0.06
    0.062832505 = product of:
      0.08377667 = sum of:
        0.004579463 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004579463 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.025577743 = product of:
          0.051155485 = sum of:
            0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051155485 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Normdaten spielen speziell im Hinblick auf die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung bibliografischer und archivalischer Ressourcen eine wichtige Rolle. Ein konkretes Ziel der Inhaltserschließung ist z. B., dass alle Werke über Hermann Hesse einheitlich zu finden sind. Hier bieten Normdaten eine Lösung, indem z. B. bei der Erschließung einheitlich die GND-Nummer 11855042X für Hermann Hesse verwendet wird. Das Ergebnis ist eine höhere Qualität der Inhaltserschließung vor allem im Sinne von Einheitlichkeit und Eindeutigkeit und, daraus resultierend, eine bessere Auffindbarkeit. Werden solche Entitäten miteinander verknüpft, z. B. Hermann Hesse mit einem seiner Werke, entsteht ein Knowledge Graph, wie ihn etwa Google bei der Inhaltserschließung des Web verwendet (Singhal 2012). Die Entwicklung des Google Knowledge Graph und das hier vorgestellte Protokoll sind historisch miteinander verbunden: OpenRefine wurde ursprünglich als Google Refine entwickelt, und die Funktionalität zum Abgleich mit externen Datenquellen (Reconciliation) wurde ursprünglich zur Einbindung von Freebase entwickelt, einer der Datenquellen des Google Knowledge Graph. Freebase wurde später in Wikidata integriert. Schon Google Refine wurde zum Abgleich mit Normdaten verwendet, etwa den Library of Congress Subject Headings (Hooland et al. 2013).
    Type
    a
  5. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.05
    0.053843454 = product of:
      0.07179127 = sum of:
        0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003238169 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.014933636 = product of:
          0.029867273 = sum of:
            0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029867273 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Type
    a
  6. DiLauro, T.; Choudhury, G.S.; Patton, M.; Warner, J.W.; Brown, E.W.: Automated name authority control and enhanced searching in the Levy collection (2001) 0.05
    0.05366232 = product of:
      0.07154976 = sum of:
        0.0081919925 = weight(_text_:a in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0081919925 = score(doc=1160,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042895574 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
        0.020462193 = product of:
          0.040924385 = sum of:
            0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040924385 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is the second in a series in D-Lib Magazine and describes a workflow management system being developed by the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library (MSEL) of The Johns Hopkins University. Based on experience from digitizing the Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music, it was apparent that large-scale digitization efforts require a significant amount of human labor that is both time-consuming and costly. Consequently, this workflow management system aims to reduce the amount of human labor and time for large-scale digitization projects. The mission of this second phase of the project ("Levy II") can be summarized as follows: * Reduce costs for large collection ingestion by creating a suite of open-source processes, tools, and interfaces for workflow management * Increase access capabilities by providing a suite of research tools * Demonstrate utility of tools and processes with a subset of the online Levy Collection The cornerstones of the workflow management system include optical music recognition (OMR) software and an automated name authority control system (ANAC). The OMR software generates a logical representation of the score for sound generation, music searching, and musicological research. The ANAC disambiguates names, associating each name with an individual (e.g., the composer Septimus Winner also published under the pseudonyms Alice Hawthorne and Apsley Street, among others). Complementing the workflow tools, a suite of research tools focuses upon enhanced searching capabilities through the development and application of a fast, disk-based search engine for lyrics and music and the incorporation of an XML structure for metadata. The first paper (Choudhury et al. 2001) described the OMR software and musical components of Levy II. This paper focuses on the metadata and intellectual access components that include automated name authority control and the aforementioned search engine.
    Type
    a
  7. Lorenz, B.; Steffens, M.: Systematik und Schlagwortnormdatei zwischen Universalität und Individualität (1997) 0.03
    0.025440529 = product of:
      0.050881058 = sum of:
        0.009066874 = weight(_text_:a in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009066874 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
        0.041814182 = product of:
          0.083628364 = sum of:
            0.083628364 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083628364 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    24. 5.2001 19:22:37
    Type
    a
  8. Bee, G.: CrissCross (2006) 0.02
    0.019900173 = product of:
      0.039800346 = sum of:
        0.0022667185 = weight(_text_:a in 1275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022667185 = score(doc=1275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 1275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1275)
        0.037533626 = weight(_text_:et in 1275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037533626 = score(doc=1275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 1275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1275)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    An diesem Punkt setzt das neue Projekt CrissCross an, das gemeinsam von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) und der Fachhochschule Köln betrieben und von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert wird. CrissCross schafft Verbindungslinien zwischen einigen besonders verbreiteten und bewährten Erschließungsinstrumenten: Der deutschsprachigen Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD), den besonders im angloamerikanischen Raum verbreiteten Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), der französischen Dokumentationssprache Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié (Rameau) und der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) als dem international am meisten verbreiteten Klassifikationssystem. CrissCross kann dabei auf zwei wichtigen Vorgängerprojekten aufbauen. Hier ist zum einen das ebenfalls von DNB und der Fachhochschule Köln gemeinsam betriebene Vorgängerprojekt »DDC Deutsch« zu nennen. Bereits während dessen Laufzeit war deutlich geworden, wie vorteilhaft sich eine Anreicherung des DDC-Registers mit dem Schlagwortbestand der SWD auf die Klassifikationspraxis auswirken könnte. Genau dieser Schritt wird nun vollzogen, wobei sich die Projektarbeit auf die Sachschlagwörter konzentriert - kein kleines Unterfangen, beläuft sich doch die Zahl der zurzeit in der SWD befindlichen Datensätze mit dem Indikator s auf über 154.000.
    Type
    a
  9. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.01
    0.014986983 = product of:
      0.029973965 = sum of:
        0.009066874 = weight(_text_:a in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009066874 = score(doc=180,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  10. Ansorge, K.: Das was 2007 (2007) 0.01
    0.014549732 = product of:
      0.029099464 = sum of:
        0.0022897315 = weight(_text_:a in 2405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022897315 = score(doc=2405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.045040898 = fieldWeight in 2405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2405)
        0.026809733 = weight(_text_:et in 2405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026809733 = score(doc=2405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12959956 = fieldWeight in 2405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2405)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    "DDC-Deutsch - Bereits im Jahr 2006 wurde die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) für die inhaltliche Erschließung der in den Reihen B (Monografien und Periodika außerhalb des Verlagsbuchhandels) und H (Hochschulschriften) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie angezeigten Publikationen eingeführt. Mit Heft 1/2007 hat die DDC auch in der Reihe A (Monografien und Periodika des Verlagsbuchhandels) Einzug gehalten. Die dort angezeigten Publikationen werden zusätzlich wie bisher vollständig mit RSWK Schlagwortketten erschlossen. Die DNB wird damit zum größten europäischen Lieferanten von Dewey-Notationen und nimmt nach der LoC weltweit die zweite Stelle ein. Durch die Integration der Daten der DNB in den WorldCat werden Sichtbarkeit und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten dieses Angebots auch über den deutschsprachigen Raum hinaus verbessert. Um den Informationsaustausch unter den europäischen DDC-Anwendern zu verbessern, europäische Belange in der Klassifikation stärker durchzusetzen und die Verbreitung in Europa gemeinsam mit OCLC zu koordinieren, wurde die EDUG (European DDC Users' Group) gegründet."
    "CrissCross - Ende Januar 2006 startete das von der DNB und der Fachhochschule Köln gemeinsam betriebene und von der DFG geförderte Projekt CrissCross. Das Projekt soll ein multilinguales, thesaurusbasiertes und benutzergerechtes Recherchevokabular schaffen. Hierzu werden die Sachschlagwörter der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) mit den DDC-Notationen verbunden. Die Multilingualität wird durch die Verknüpfung mit ihren Äquivalenten in den beiden umfassenden Schlagwortnormdateien Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und Rameau (Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié) erreicht. Die im Rahmen des Projekts erarbeiteten Festlegungen zur methodischen Vorgehensweise bei der Verknüpfung der DDC mit den SWD-Sachschlagwörtern wurden weiter präzisiert und fortentwickelt. Für die zweite Komponente des Projekts, die Anreicherung der in der Datenbank des MACS-Projekts vorliegenden Verbindungen zwischen LCSH und Rameau um den äquivalenten SWD-Terminus, wurde eine Vervollständigung und eine Verbesserung der Datenbasis erreicht und Tests der Verlinkung durchgeführt."
    Type
    a
  11. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.014537444 = product of:
      0.029074889 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.023893818 = product of:
          0.047787637 = sum of:
            0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047787637 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  12. Danowski, P.; Pfeifer, B.: Wikipedia und Normdateien : Wege der Vernetzung am Beispiel der Kooperation mit der Personennamendatei (2007) 0.01
    0.014537444 = product of:
      0.029074889 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
        0.023893818 = product of:
          0.047787637 = sum of:
            0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047787637 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2011 11:54:22
    Type
    a
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01
    0.014379617 = product of:
      0.028759234 = sum of:
        0.007852144 = weight(_text_:a in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007852144 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  14. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.01
    0.01365917 = product of:
      0.02731834 = sum of:
        0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064112484 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  15. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.01
    0.01365917 = product of:
      0.02731834 = sum of:
        0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064112484 = score(doc=156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.01
    0.0127202645 = product of:
      0.025440529 = sum of:
        0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004533437 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  17. Zedlitz, J.: Biographische Normdaten : ein Überblick (2017) 0.01
    0.010903083 = product of:
      0.021806166 = sum of:
        0.003885803 = weight(_text_:a in 3502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003885803 = score(doc=3502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3502)
        0.017920362 = product of:
          0.035840724 = sum of:
            0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035840724 = score(doc=3502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Archivar. 70(2017) H.1, S.22-25
    Type
    a
  18. Scheven, E.: Qualitätssicherung in der GND (2021) 0.01
    0.010903083 = product of:
      0.021806166 = sum of:
        0.003885803 = weight(_text_:a in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003885803 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
        0.017920362 = product of:
          0.035840724 = sum of:
            0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035840724 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2021 19:12:22
    Type
    a
  19. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.01
    0.010704987 = product of:
      0.021409974 = sum of:
        0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006476338 = score(doc=191,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
        0.014933636 = product of:
          0.029867273 = sum of:
            0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029867273 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  20. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.01
    0.00975655 = product of:
      0.0195131 = sum of:
        0.004579463 = weight(_text_:a in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004579463 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.014933636 = product of:
          0.029867273 = sum of:
            0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029867273 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types