Search (194 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Rahmstorf, G.: ¬An integrated conceptual representation for words and phrases (1992) 0.25
    0.24983013 = product of:
      0.34976217 = sum of:
        0.037415363 = product of:
          0.074830726 = sum of:
            0.074830726 = weight(_text_:p in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074830726 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.5617989 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057740733 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
        0.20302504 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20302504 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.7781408 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
        0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007695774 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Source
    Discourse and lexical meaning. Proceedings of a Workshop of the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Stuttgart, 30.11.-1.12.1992. Ed.: P. Bosch u. P. Gerstl
    Type
    a
  2. Rahmstorf, G.: Bedeutungsdefinition und Wortumfeld (1993) 0.23
    0.22903527 = product of:
      0.4008117 = sum of:
        0.09798927 = weight(_text_:g in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09798927 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.70424014 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
        0.24363007 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24363007 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.933769 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=3493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Source
    Wortschatz, Satz, Text. Beiträge der Konferenzen in Greifswald und Neubrandenburg 1992. Hrsg.: G. Bartels u. I. Pohl
    Type
    a
  3. Rahmstorf, G.: Methoden und Formate für mehrsprachige Begriffssysteme (1996) 0.15
    0.1477144 = product of:
      0.34466693 = sum of:
        0.031747986 = product of:
          0.06349597 = sum of:
            0.06349597 = weight(_text_:p in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349597 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06928888 = weight(_text_:g in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06928888 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
        0.24363007 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24363007 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.933769 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Type
    p
  4. Rahmstorf, G.: Wortmodell und Begriffssprache als Basis des semantischen Retrievals (2000) 0.13
    0.1336039 = product of:
      0.23380682 = sum of:
        0.057160407 = weight(_text_:g in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057160407 = score(doc=5484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.41080675 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
        0.14211753 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14211753 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.54469854 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
        0.0038092136 = weight(_text_:a in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038092136 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
    Type
    a
  5. Rahmstorf, G.: Visualisierung : Vom Begriff zum Bild (1998) 0.08
    0.07986225 = product of:
      0.18634525 = sum of:
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 6596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=6596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 6596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6596)
        0.14211753 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 6596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14211753 = score(doc=6596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.54469854 = fieldWeight in 6596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6596)
        0.0038092136 = weight(_text_:a in 6596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038092136 = score(doc=6596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 6596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6596)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Rahmstorf, G.: Wege zur Ontologie (2006) 0.08
    0.07594383 = product of:
      0.1329017 = sum of:
        0.023096293 = weight(_text_:g in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023096293 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.08121002 = weight(_text_:rahmstorf in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08121002 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26091042 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.31125632 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.042927 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.024825243 = weight(_text_:u in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024825243 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.003770144 = weight(_text_:a in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003770144 = score(doc=5868,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologie ist in der Philosophie die Auseinandersetzung mit der Frage, welche Arten von Gegenständen existieren und in welcher Weise sie existieren. Ein zentrales Thema ist z. B., ob es geistige Gegenstände, z. B. Gedanken, Ideen, Begriffe, Vorstellungen u. a. gibt und wie ihre Existenz begründet wird. Neuerdings wird mit dem Wort "Ontologie" eine andere, etwas konkretere Bedeutung verbunden. Unter einer Ontologie werden die allgemeinsten Begriffe eines Fachgebiets verstanden. So gehören zur Ontologie des Organischen u. a. "Pflanze", "Tier" und "Mensch". Wenn der Begriff "Tier" schon gegeben ist, lassen sich daraus andere Begriffe, z. B. "Wirbeltier", "Reptil", "Säugetier" usw. spezifizierend durch Angabe weiterer Merkmale bilden. Außerdem können Begriffsbeziehungen und andere formale Mittel zu Ontologien gehören. Ontologie ist danach die Methode, durch die die Begriffswelt eines Sachgebiets bestimmt wird, und insbesondere das Ergebnis dieser Methode: die Struktur aus Begriffen höchster Allgemeinheit, die mit dieser Methode erstellt wird. Das Wort "Ontologie" kann jedoch unterschiedlich verstanden wird. Es bezeichnet auch die Gesamtheit aller Begriffe, die zum Untersuchungsgegenstand gehören. Die Ontologie umfasst dann alles, was an Begriffen aus einer bestimmten Aufgabenstellung betrachtet bzw. erarbeitet wird. Zu einer Ontologie der Elektronik würden alle Begriffe dieses Gebietes gehören. Mit einem so weit gefassten Verständnis des Wortes "Ontologie" wird die Fokussierung auf die Kategorien größter Allgemeinheit der hierarchisch gegliederten Begriffswelt aufgegeben. Außerdem würde eine so verstandene Ontologie mit der Tatsache der Unabgrenzbarkeit des Wortschatzes belastet werden. Komposita können im Deutschen quasi unbegrenzt erweitert werden. Es gibt nicht nur den Kamin und den Kaminfeger, sondern auch die Kaminfegerarbeitskleidungsreinigungsfirma und dergleichen mehr. Komposita sind unverzichtbar. Ihre maximale Länge ist nicht festgelegt. Die Benennungen für Stoffe in der Chemie zeigen, dass man in dieser Fachsprache durchaus problemlos mit sehr langen Zusammensetzungen kommuniziert. Aber die Ontologen werden nicht daran interessiert sein, ihre Untersuchungen bis in die Tiefen aller Fachgebiete auszudehnen. Kurzum "Ontologie" sollte sich auf Begriffe höchster Allgemeinheit beziehen. Das entspricht der engeren Bedeutung des Wortes "Ontologie". Die Unterbegriffe dieser Top-Level-Begriffe können natürlich ebenfalls für Ontologen von Interesse sein, weil sie zeigen, welches Begriffsbildungspotenzial die verschiedenen Top-Level-Begriffe haben. Der Schwerpunkt des Interesses der Ontologen sollte aber auf den Begriffen liegen, die nicht weiter zurückführbar sind.
    Type
    a
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.05
    0.054318372 = product of:
      0.095057145 = sum of:
        0.015873993 = product of:
          0.031747986 = sum of:
            0.031747986 = weight(_text_:p in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031747986 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03464444 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.037237864 = weight(_text_:u in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037237864 = score(doc=3941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007300853 = score(doc=3941,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
    Type
    a
  8. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.05
    0.048584566 = product of:
      0.085022986 = sum of:
        0.018519659 = product of:
          0.037039317 = sum of:
            0.037039317 = weight(_text_:p in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037039317 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
        0.008517661 = weight(_text_:a in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008517661 = score(doc=2574,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
        0.017567152 = product of:
          0.035134304 = sum of:
            0.035134304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035134304 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    A method (HICLAS, DeBoeck & Rosenberg, 1988) for studying the internal structure of semantic concepts is presented. The proposed method reveals the internal structure of the extension as well as the intesion of a concept, together with a correspondence relation that shows the mutual dependence of both structures. Its use is illustrated with the analysis of simple concepts (e.g. sports) and conjunctive concepts (e.g. birds that are also pets). The underlying structure that is revealed can be interpreted as a differentiation of the simple concepts studied and for conjunctive concepts the proposed method is able to extract non-inherited and emergent features (Hampton, 1988)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
    Type
    a
  9. Winograd, T.: ¬Ein prozedurales Modell des Sprachverstehens (1977) 0.05
    0.04547018 = product of:
      0.10609709 = sum of:
        0.037039317 = product of:
          0.074078634 = sum of:
            0.074078634 = weight(_text_:p in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074078634 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.061439343 = weight(_text_:u in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061439343 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Semantik und künstliche Intelligenz: Beiträge zur automatischen Sprachbearbeitung II. Hrsg. u. eingeleitet von P. Eisenberg
    Type
    a
  10. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.04
    0.044653747 = product of:
      0.10419208 = sum of:
        0.061439343 = weight(_text_:u in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061439343 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.035134304 = product of:
          0.07026861 = sum of:
            0.07026861 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07026861 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
    Source
    Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse: Vorträge der Arbeitsgruppe Begriffsanalyse, Darmstadt 1986. Hrsg. von B. Ganter, R. Wille u. K.E. Wolff
    Type
    a
  11. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.04
    0.038760822 = product of:
      0.067831434 = sum of:
        0.016038496 = product of:
          0.032076992 = sum of:
            0.032076992 = weight(_text_:p in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032076992 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.24082111 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028580204 = weight(_text_:g in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028580204 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20540337 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.015359836 = weight(_text_:u in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015359836 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.007852895 = weight(_text_:a in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007852895 = score(doc=5089,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.1838419 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
    Editor
    Stumme, G.
  12. Thellefsen, M.: ¬The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation (2006) 0.04
    0.038074743 = product of:
      0.088841066 = sum of:
        0.046192586 = weight(_text_:g in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046192586 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
        0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007540288 = score(doc=170,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 170, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=170)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper present an alternative approach to knowledge organization based on semiotic reasoning. The semantic distance between domain specific terminology and KOS is analyzed by means of their different sign systems. It is argued that a faceted approach may provide the means needed to minimize the gap between knowledge domains and KOS.
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  13. Sprache und Begriff (1970) 0.04
    0.03586942 = product of:
      0.12554297 = sum of:
        0.08165773 = weight(_text_:g in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08165773 = score(doc=1224,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: LINDNER, I.: Fachsprache: Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Information?; HEINSOHN, G.: Vom Wesen des Begriffs; WERSIG, G.: Begriff und Begriffsinhalt: die Eindeutigkeit und Vieldeutigkeit von Begriffen als Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Dokumentation; HASENMÜLLER, U.: Begriffe als Bausteine des Dokuments; FISCHER, K.-H.: Begriffs- (Sachverhalts-) Analyse des Dokuments
  14. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.03
    0.03279653 = product of:
      0.07652523 = sum of:
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=4031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=4031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.005387042 = weight(_text_:a in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005387042 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Als Erfinder des «Allgemeinen» gilt, gemäß dem Bericht des Aristoteles und seit diesem Bericht, Sokrates. Er ist es, der nicht mehr danach suchte, woraus ein Ding zu dem geworden ist, was es ist, oder wie es entstanden ist, sondern danach, «was [ein Ding] ist», und somit ist Sokrates der erste gewesen, der die Herausarbeitung des Allgemeinen (?a?????) forderte und mit seinen Fragen seine Gesprächspartner zu dieser Herausarbeitung trieb bzw. lockte; die Definition (???sµ??) war das Ziel des sokratischen Gesprächs, und die sokratische Aporie war das Vehikel.
    Source
    Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Hrsg.: J. Ritter, K. Gründer u. G. Gabriel
    Type
    a
  15. Ausgewählte Texte zur Terminologie (1993) 0.03
    0.032347064 = product of:
      0.07547648 = sum of:
        0.028870367 = weight(_text_:g in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028870367 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=5650,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
        0.0027208668 = weight(_text_:a in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027208668 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The book contains a number of important papers from other languages than German which were translated for the purpose of this publication. Since many of the papers are out of print, these reprints and translations help saving them from being lost
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: WÜSTER, E.: Terminologielehre; HAJUTIN, A.D.: Die verschiedenen Richtungen in der Terminologiearbeit; KOCOUREK, R.: Der Terminus und seine Definition; DROZD, L.: Zum Gegenstand und zur Methode der Terminologielehre; HORECKY, J.: Zu Bedeutungsbeziehungen zwischen den terminologischen Benennungen; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Spezifik des spezialsprachlichen Wortschatzes gegenüber dem allgemeinen Wortschatz; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Frage des Systems in der Terminologie; REFORMATSKIJ, A.A.: Was ist eine Benennung und was ist Terminologie?; SUPERANSKAJA, A.V.: Theoretische Terminologiearbeit; ZHURAVLEV, V.F. u. G.G. SAMBUROVA: Philosophisch-logische Aspekte der Terminologieregelung und -normung; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Einige logisch-methodologische Fragen der Regelung des Begriffsapparates und von Terminologien; NALEPIN, V.L.: Begriffsarten und Definitionsstruktur; WÜSTER, E.: Das Worten der Welt, schaubildlich und terminologisch dargestellt; WÜSTER, E.: Die Allgemeine Terminologielehre: ein Grenzgebiet zwischen Sprachwissenschaft, Logik, Ontologie, Informatik und den Sachwissenschaften; FELBER, H.: Einige Grundfragen der Terminologiewissenschaft aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; COLE, W.D.: Terminologie: Grundsätze und Methoden; SCHULZE, E.: Der Terminus: Eigenschaften und Wesen sowie seine Abgrenzung von anderen Lexemarten; PICHT, H.: Fachsprachliche Phraseologie; OESER, E.: Terminologie als Voraussetzung der Wissenstechnik; BUDIN, G., C. GALINSKI, W. NEDOBITY u. R. THALLER: Terminologie und die Wissensverarbeitung; PICHT, H. u. C. LAURÉN: Vergleich der terminologischen Schulen
    Editor
    Laurén, C. u. H. Picht
  16. Strauß, G.; Hass, U.; Harras, G.: Brisante Wörter von Agitation bis Zeitgeist : ein Lexikon zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch (1989) 0.03
    0.028695539 = product of:
      0.10043438 = sum of:
        0.06532618 = weight(_text_:g in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06532618 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.46949342 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  17. Bronowski, J.; Bellugi, U.: Language, name, and concept (1970) 0.03
    0.028186847 = product of:
      0.09865396 = sum of:
        0.08777049 = weight(_text_:u in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08777049 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.7235568 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
        0.010883467 = weight(_text_:a in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010883467 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.03
    0.026915226 = product of:
      0.062802196 = sum of:
        0.040828865 = weight(_text_:g in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040828865 = score(doc=1440,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
        0.00942536 = weight(_text_:a in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00942536 = score(doc=1440,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
        0.012547966 = product of:
          0.025095932 = sum of:
            0.025095932 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025095932 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  19. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.03
    0.026483519 = product of:
      0.061794877 = sum of:
        0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040418513 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
        0.0038092136 = weight(_text_:a in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038092136 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
        0.017567152 = product of:
          0.035134304 = sum of:
            0.035134304 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035134304 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
    Type
    a
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.03
    0.025516426 = product of:
      0.059538327 = sum of:
        0.035108197 = weight(_text_:u in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035108197 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.004353387 = weight(_text_:a in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004353387 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a

Languages

  • d 100
  • e 82
  • m 7
  • ru 3
  • nl 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 168
  • m 14
  • s 10
  • el 4
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…