Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

0.012490158 = product of:
  0.04371555 = sum of:
    0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027811468 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    0.015904086 = product of:
      0.03180817 = sum of:
        0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180817 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.01070585 = product of:
  0.037470475 = sum of:
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.00532499 = product of:
  0.037274927 = sum of:
    0.037274927 = weight(_text_:i in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037274927 = score(doc=1176,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The rapid growth of Internet resources and digital collections has been accompanied by a proliferation of metadata schemas, each of which has been designed based on the requirements of particular user communities, intended users, types of materials, subject domains, project needs, etc. Problems arise when building large digital libraries or repositories with metadata records that were prepared according to diverse schemas. This article (published in two parts) contains an analysis of the methods that have been used to achieve or improve interoperability among metadata schemas and applications, for the purposes of facilitating conversion and exchange of metadata and enabling cross-domain metadata harvesting and federated searches. From a methodological point of view, implementing interoperability may be considered at different levels of operation: schema level, record level, and repository level. Part I of the article intends to explain possible situations in which metadata schemas may be created or implemented, whether in individual projects or in integrated repositories. It also discusses approaches used at the schema level. Part II of the article will discuss metadata interoperability efforts at the record and repository levels.

0.004540648 = product of:
  0.031784534 = sum of:
    0.031784534 = weight(_text_:u in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031784534 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.004259992 = product of:
  0.029819941 = sum of:
    0.029819941 = weight(_text_:i in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029819941 = score(doc=1177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This is the second part of an analysis of the methods that have been used to achieve or improve interoperability among metadata schemas and their applications in order to facilitate the conversion and exchange of metadata and to enable cross-domain metadata harvesting and federated searches. From a methodological point of view, implementing interoperability may be considered at different levels of operation: schema level (discussed in Part I of the article), record level (discussed in Part II of the article), and repository level (also discussed in Part II). The results of efforts to improve interoperability may be observed from different perspectives as well, including element-based and value-based approaches. As discussed in Part I of this study, the results of efforts to improve interoperability can be observed at different levels: 1. Schema level - Efforts are focused on the elements of the schemas, being independent of any applications. The results usually appear as derived element sets or encoded schemas, crosswalks, application profiles, and element registries. 2. Record level - Efforts are intended to integrate the metadata records through the mapping of the elements according to the semantic meanings of these elements. Common results include converted records and new records resulting from combining values of existing records. 3. Repository level - With harvested or integrated records from varying sources, efforts at this level focus on mapping value strings associated with particular elements (e.g., terms associated with subject or format elements). The results enable cross-collection searching. In the following sections, we will continue to analyze interoperability efforts and methodologies, focusing on the record level and the repository level. It should be noted that the models to be discussed in this article are not always mutually exclusive. Sometimes, within a particular project, more than one method may be used.

0.003973067 = product of:
  0.027811468 = sum of:
    0.027811468 = weight(_text_:u in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027811468 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

0.0038712325 = product of:
  0.027098626 = sum of:
    0.027098626 = weight(_text_:p in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027098626 = score(doc=462,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

More than 15 years ago, A Companion to Digital Humanities marked out the area of digital humanities (DH) "as a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., 2004, p. xxiii). In the years that followed, there is ample evidence that the DH domain, formed by the intersection of humanities disciplines and digital information technology, has undergone remarkable expansion. This growth is reflected in A New Companion to Digital Humanities (Schreibman et al., 2016). The extensively revised contents of the second edition were contributed by a global team of authors who are pioneers of innovative research in the field. Over this formative period, DH has become a widely recognized, impactful mode of scholarship and an institutional unit for collaborative, transdisciplinary, and computationally engaged research, teaching, and publication (Burdick et al., 2012; Svensson, 2010; Van Ruyskensvelde, 2014). The field of DH has advanced tremendously over the last decade and continues to expand. Meanwhile, competing definitions and approaches of DH scholars continue to spark debate. "Complexity" was a theme of the DH2019 international conference, as it demonstrates the multifaceted connections within DH scholarship today (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, 2019). Yet, while it is often assumed that the DH is in flux and not particularly fixed as an institutional or intellectual construct, there are also obviously touchstones within the DH field, most visibly in the relationship between traditional humanities disciplines and technological infrastructures. Thus, it is still meaningful to "bring together the humanistic and the digital through embracing a non-territorial and liminal zone" (Svensson, 2016, p. 477). This is the focus of this JASIST special issue, which mirrors the increasing attention on DH worldwide.

0.0034217187 = product of:
  0.02395203 = sum of:
    0.02395203 = weight(_text_:p in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02395203 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12058865 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.003405486 = product of:
  0.0238384 = sum of:
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan

0.003405486 = product of:
  0.0238384 = sum of:
    0.0238384 = weight(_text_:u in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0238384 = score(doc=857,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan

0.002837905 = product of:
  0.019865334 = sum of:
    0.019865334 = weight(_text_:u in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019865334 = score(doc=4828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero

0.002837905 = product of:
  0.019865334 = sum of:
    0.019865334 = weight(_text_:u in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019865334 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109820455 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro

0.0027540952 = product of:
  0.019278666 = sum of:
    0.019278666 = product of:
      0.038557332 = sum of:
        0.038557332 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038557332 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.0022950792 = product of:
  0.016065553 = sum of:
    0.016065553 = product of:
      0.032131106 = sum of:
        0.032131106 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032131106 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.0019474393 = product of:
  0.013632074 = sum of:
    0.013632074 = product of:
      0.027264148 = sum of:
        0.027264148 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027264148 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 8.2014 17:12:54

0.0018360633 = product of:
  0.012852442 = sum of:
    0.012852442 = product of:
      0.025704885 = sum of:
        0.025704885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025704885 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.0016228661 = product of:
  0.011360062 = sum of:
    0.011360062 = product of:
      0.022720125 = sum of:
        0.022720125 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022720125 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

8. 4.2015 16:22:13

0.0012982929 = product of:
  0.00908805 = sum of:
    0.00908805 = product of:
      0.0181761 = sum of:
        0.0181761 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0181761 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

28.10.2013 17:22:17