-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.01
0.01203472 = product of:
0.02406944 = sum of:
0.02406944 = product of:
0.072208315 = sum of:
0.072208315 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072208315 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.01
0.011346444 = product of:
0.022692887 = sum of:
0.022692887 = product of:
0.06807866 = sum of:
0.06807866 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06807866 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.01
0.011346444 = product of:
0.022692887 = sum of:
0.022692887 = product of:
0.06807866 = sum of:
0.06807866 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06807866 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Wheatley, A.: ¬A manual on printed subject indexes : report to the British Library Research and Development Department on Project SI/G/243 (1978)
0.01
0.010119969 = product of:
0.020239938 = sum of:
0.020239938 = product of:
0.060719814 = sum of:
0.060719814 = weight(_text_:29 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060719814 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 5.2007 19:29:37
-
Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996)
0.01
0.010119969 = product of:
0.020239938 = sum of:
0.020239938 = product of:
0.060719814 = sum of:
0.060719814 = weight(_text_:29 in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060719814 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 2.1997 10:29:16
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.01
0.010028934 = product of:
0.020057868 = sum of:
0.020057868 = product of:
0.0601736 = sum of:
0.0601736 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0601736 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Browne, G.: Professional liability of indexers (1996)
0.01
0.008095975 = product of:
0.01619195 = sum of:
0.01619195 = product of:
0.04857585 = sum of:
0.04857585 = weight(_text_:29 in 3643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04857585 = score(doc=3643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3643)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 5.1999 19:29:09
-
Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995)
0.01
0.008095975 = product of:
0.01619195 = sum of:
0.01619195 = product of:
0.04857585 = sum of:
0.04857585 = weight(_text_:29 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04857585 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 14:29:45
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.008023147 = product of:
0.016046293 = sum of:
0.016046293 = product of:
0.04813888 = sum of:
0.04813888 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04813888 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.01
0.008023147 = product of:
0.016046293 = sum of:
0.016046293 = product of:
0.04813888 = sum of:
0.04813888 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04813888 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.01
0.008023147 = product of:
0.016046293 = sum of:
0.016046293 = product of:
0.04813888 = sum of:
0.04813888 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04813888 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.01
0.007020253 = product of:
0.014040506 = sum of:
0.014040506 = product of:
0.04212152 = sum of:
0.04212152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04212152 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.007020253 = product of:
0.014040506 = sum of:
0.014040506 = product of:
0.04212152 = sum of:
0.04212152 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04212152 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994)
0.01
0.006071981 = product of:
0.012143962 = sum of:
0.012143962 = product of:
0.036431886 = sum of:
0.036431886 = weight(_text_:29 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036431886 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 21(1994) no.1, S.29-31
-
Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000)
0.01
0.006071981 = product of:
0.012143962 = sum of:
0.012143962 = product of:
0.036431886 = sum of:
0.036431886 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036431886 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
-
Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994)
0.01
0.006071981 = product of:
0.012143962 = sum of:
0.012143962 = product of:
0.036431886 = sum of:
0.036431886 = weight(_text_:29 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036431886 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:32:09
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.01
0.005014467 = product of:
0.010028934 = sum of:
0.010028934 = product of:
0.0300868 = sum of:
0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0300868 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Mulvany, N.C.: Indexing books (2005)
0.00
0.0040479875 = product of:
0.008095975 = sum of:
0.008095975 = product of:
0.024287924 = sum of:
0.024287924 = weight(_text_:29 in 72) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024287924 = score(doc=72,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 72, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=72)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24.11.2006 12:58:29
-
Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003)
0.00
0.0035101266 = product of:
0.007020253 = sum of:
0.007020253 = product of:
0.02106076 = sum of:
0.02106076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02106076 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
-
Stauber, D.M.: Facing the text : content and structure in book indexing (2004)
0.00
0.0025299923 = product of:
0.0050599845 = sum of:
0.0050599845 = product of:
0.015179954 = sum of:
0.015179954 = weight(_text_:29 in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015179954 = score(doc=5040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.044413086 = queryNorm
0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 18:09:29
