Search (4200 results, page 1 of 210)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Thelwall, M.: Directing students to new information types : a new role for Google in literature searches? (2005) 0.19
    0.19329357 = product of:
      0.28994036 = sum of:
        0.23654105 = weight(_text_:specialist in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23654105 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.72914284 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.053399306 = product of:
          0.10679861 = sum of:
            0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10679861 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Conducting a literature review is an important activity for postgraduates and many undergraduates. Librarians can play an important role, directing students to digital libraries, compiling online subject reSource lists, and educating about the need to evaluate the quality of online resources. In order to conduct an effective literature search in a new area, however, in some subjects it is necessary to gain basic topic knowledge, including specialist vocabularies. Google's link-based page ranking algorithm makes this search engine an ideal tool for finding specialist topic introductory material, particularly in computer science, and so librarians should be teaching this as part of a strategic literature review approach.
  2. Bein, A.: Cataloguing of materials in African languages (1993) 0.16
    0.15620479 = product of:
      0.23430718 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
        0.043153156 = product of:
          0.08630631 = sum of:
            0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08630631 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In many libraries the cataloging of materials in African languages is done of necessity by librarians who have little or no background in the languages or the subject matter. Guidelines and reference tools are suggested for the non-specialist cataloger, and suggestions are made for an appropriate attitude toward the whole problem.
  3. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries in the year 2001 (1993) 0.15
    0.14710607 = product of:
      0.22065909 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=7599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
        0.053399306 = product of:
          0.10679861 = sum of:
            0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10679861 = score(doc=7599,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the trend away from a paper based society and towards an electronic society: with the advent of computers, electronic mail, computer conferencing, electronic invisible colleges, and the application of computers to libraries and information networks, and to publishing, with the production of electronic media. Forecasts the advent of the electronic library and the electronic librarian, the decline in the use of present day libraries, technical and library services, and the enhanced and extended role of librarians in the new situation. Predicts the eventual demise of the traditional library with the exception of non research libraries but the enhanced value of the librarians as an information specialist
  4. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.15
    0.14501782 = product of:
      0.21752672 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  5. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.15
    0.14501782 = product of:
      0.21752672 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Bouchon, C.: ¬Le classement méthodique de la collection des gravures et de photographies de la Bibliothèque des arts décoratifs (1997) 0.15
    0.14501782 = product of:
      0.21752672 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes Jules Maciet's collection in the Bibliothèque des arts décoratifs, one of Paris's most accessible specialist art libraries, which offers the researcher an eclectic range of visual materials inclusing rare prints and photographs. It is an exhaustive collection still classified today according to the original system. An index of engravers, publishers and printsellers, and sources serves artists, researchers and other users
    Source
    Art libraries journal. 22(1997) no.3, S.33-38
  7. White, M.D.: Questions in reference interviews (1998) 0.13
    0.12817885 = product of:
      0.19226827 = sum of:
        0.16895789 = weight(_text_:specialist in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16895789 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5208163 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
        0.02331038 = product of:
          0.04662076 = sum of:
            0.04662076 = weight(_text_:22 in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04662076 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article characterises the questioning behaviour in reference interviews preceding delegated online searches of bibliographic databases and relates it to questioning behaviour in other types of interviews/settings. With one exception, the unit of analysis is the question (N=610), not the interview. The author uses A.C. Graesser's typology of questions to analyse type of question and M.D. White's typology of information categories to determine the question's content objective; this is the first application of Graesser's typology to interview questions in any setting. Graesser's categories allow for a more subtle understanding of the kind of information need underlying a question. Comparisons are made between questions asked by the information specialist and those asked by the client. Findings show that the information specialist dominates the interview, about half the questions were verification questions and about 22% were judgemental questions or requests; all but four types of questions from Graesser's categories appeared in the interviews, but no new question types were discovered. Clients often phrase questions as requests. In content, both clients and information specialists focus on the subject and service requested, but the clients ask also about search strategy and output features. Both parties ask predominantly short-answer questions. Results are related to interface design for retrieval systems.
    Date
    2.12.2005 14:48:22
  8. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.13
    0.1268906 = product of:
      0.19033588 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  9. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.13
    0.1268906 = product of:
      0.19033588 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  10. Richardson, R.; Smeaton, A.F.; Murphy, J.: Using WordNet for conceptual distance measurement (1996) 0.13
    0.1268906 = product of:
      0.19033588 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  11. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.13
    0.1268906 = product of:
      0.19033588 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  12. Fairthorne, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes (1969) 0.11
    0.11150652 = product of:
      0.33451957 = sum of:
        0.33451957 = weight(_text_:specialist in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33451957 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            1.0311637 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Mood, T.A.: Of sundials and digital watches : a further step toward the new paradigm of reference (1994) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The new paradigm of reference, in which the reference librarian becomes a consultant more than a quick-answer specialist, needs to be stretched, Mood advocates. Rather than assisting people with their research, the reference librarian needs to do the research for them. After an interview to assess the user's needs, the librarian searches various print and nonprint access tools, then presents to the patron a bibliography of sources and - possibly - copies of articles and books. This new approach to reference is needed because of both the increasing complication of libraries, with their myriad computer access points to information, and the increasing number of patrons who want information but do not want to learn how to retrieve it. This change in library reference can be implemented with better signage, more prepackaging of information, and an increased knowledge of the local community's information needs
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.3, S.27-32
  14. Huibers, T.W.C.; Bruza, P.D.: Situations, a general framework for studying information retrieval (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  15. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  16. Johnson, F.C.: ¬A natural language understanding system for reference resolution in information dialogues (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=6968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  17. Almerri, J.; McGregor, D.R.: Codon signatures : a document retrieval method (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  18. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  20. O'Donnell, R.; Smeaton, A.F.: ¬A linguistic approach to information retrieval (1996) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Languages

Types

  • el 95
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes