Search (150 results, page 1 of 8)

0.2251322 = product of:
  0.4502644 = sum of:
    0.064323485 = product of:
      0.19297044 = sum of:
        0.19297044 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19297044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19297044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19297044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.19297044 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19297044 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN

0.18761016 = product of:
  0.37522033 = sum of:
    0.053602904 = product of:
      0.16080871 = sum of:
        0.16080871 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16080871 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16080871 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16080871 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.16080871 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16080871 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.14736973 = product of:
  0.29473945 = sum of:
    0.09157066 = weight(_text_:english in 5948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09157066 = score(doc=5948,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.42029083 = fieldWeight in 5948, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5948)
    0.15569037 = weight(_text_:speaking in 5948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15569037 = score(doc=5948,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2840921 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.5480278 = fieldWeight in 5948, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5948)
    0.04747841 = product of:
      0.09495682 = sum of:
        0.09495682 = weight(_text_:countries in 5948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09495682 = score(doc=5948,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.42799118 = fieldWeight in 5948, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract

Efforts to combat continuing gender inequalities in academia need to be informed by evidence about where differences occur. Citations are relevant as potential evidence in appointment and promotion decisions, but it is unclear whether there have been historical gender differences in average citation impact that might explain the current shortfall of senior female academics. This study investigates the evolution of gender differences in citation impact 1996-2018 for six million articles from seven large English-speaking nations: Australia, Canada, Ireland, Jamaica, New Zealand, UK, and the USA. The results show that a small female citation advantage has been the norm over time for all these countries except the USA, where there has been no practical difference. The female citation advantage is largest, and statistically significant in most years, for Australia and the UK. This suggests that any academic bias against citing female-authored research cannot explain current employment inequalities. Nevertheless, comparisons using recent citation data, or avoiding it altogether, during appointments or promotion may disadvantage females in some countries by underestimating the likely greater impact of their work, especially in the long term.

0.058279987 = product of:
  0.17483996 = sum of:
    0.06475023 = weight(_text_:english in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06475023 = score(doc=1127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.2971905 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
    0.11008973 = weight(_text_:speaking in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11008973 = score(doc=1127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2840921 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.3875142 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

By analyzing 63 English-speaking institutions that offer ALA-accredited master's programs in library and information studies, this research aims to explore the education for knowl­edge organization (KO) at different levels and across fields. This research examines the KO courses that are the required courses and elective courses in the MLIS programs, that are offered in other master's programs and graduate certificate programs, that are adapted to the undergraduate degree and certificate programs, and that are particularly developed for programs other than MLIS. The findings indicate that the great majority of MLIS programs still have a focus on or a significant component of knowl­edge organization as their required course and include the knowl­edge organization elective courses, particularly library cataloging and classification, on their curriculum. However, there is a variety of the offerings of KO related courses across the programs in an institution or in the same program across the institutions. It shows a promising trend that the traditional and new KO courses play an important role in many other programs, at different levels and across fields. With the conventional, adapted, or innovative content, these courses demonstrate that the principles and skills of knowl­edge organization are applicable to a wide variety of settings, can be integrated with other disciplinary knowl­edge and emerging technologies, and meet the needs of different career pathways and groups of learners.

0.04839119 = product of:
  0.14517356 = sum of:
    0.053602904 = product of:
      0.16080871 = sum of:
        0.16080871 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16080871 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34335276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.09157066 = weight(_text_:english in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09157066 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.42029083 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.042115346 = product of:
  0.12634604 = sum of:
    0.10988479 = weight(_text_:english in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10988479 = score(doc=887,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.504349 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
    0.016461251 = product of:
      0.032922503 = sum of:
        0.032922503 = weight(_text_:22 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032922503 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This study investigates how privacy as an ethical concept exists in two languages: Mandarin Chinese and American English. The exploration relies on two genres of corpora from 10 years: social media posts and news articles, 2010-2019. A mixed-methods approach combining structural topic modeling (STM) and human interpretation were used to work with the data. Findings show various privacy-related topics across the two languages. Moreover, some of these different topics revealed fundamental incompatibilities for understanding privacy across these two languages. In other words, some of the variations of topics do not just reflect contextual differences; they reveal how the two languages value privacy in different ways that can relate back to the society's ethical tradition. This study is one of the first empirically grounded intercultural explorations of the concept of privacy. It has shown that natural language is promising to operationalize intercultural and comparative privacy research, and it provides an examination of the concept as it is understood in these two languages.

Date

22. 1.2023 18:59:40

0.03740955 = product of:
  0.11222865 = sum of:
    0.06475023 = weight(_text_:english in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06475023 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.2971905 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
    0.04747841 = product of:
      0.09495682 = sum of:
        0.09495682 = weight(_text_:countries in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09495682 = score(doc=11,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.42799118 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

We investigate the state of multilingualism across the social sciences and humanities (SSH) using a comprehensive data set of research outputs from seven European countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Flanders [Belgium], Norway, Poland, and Slovenia). Although English tends to be the dominant language of science, SSH researchers often produce culturally and societally relevant work in their local languages. We collected and analyzed a set of 164,218 peer-reviewed journal articles (produced by 51,063 researchers from 2013 to 2015) and found that multilingualism is prevalent despite geographical location and field. Among the researchers who published at least three journal articles during this time period, over one-third from the various countries had written their work in at least two languages. The highest share of researchers who published in only one language were from Flanders (80.9%), whereas the lowest shares were from Slovenia (57.2%) and Poland (59.3%). Our findings show that multilingual publishing is an ongoing practice in many SSH research fields regardless of geographical location, political situation, and/or historical heritage. Here we argue that research is international, but multilingual publishing keeps locally relevant research alive with the added potential for creating impact.

0.03138718 = product of:
  0.09416153 = sum of:
    0.07770028 = weight(_text_:english in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07770028 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.3566286 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
    0.016461251 = product of:
      0.032922503 = sum of:
        0.032922503 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032922503 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.

Date

22. 3.2023 12:00:14

0.026954107 = product of:
  0.16172464 = sum of:
    0.16172464 = sum of:
      0.13428922 = weight(_text_:countries in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13428922 = score(doc=5835,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.6052709 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.027435422 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027435422 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.

Date

13. 2.2020 18:22:13

0.026155982 = product of:
  0.07846794 = sum of:
    0.06475023 = weight(_text_:english in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06475023 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.2971905 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
    0.013717711 = product of:
      0.027435422 = sum of:
        0.027435422 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027435422 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04049921 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.02447845 = product of:
  0.1468707 = sum of:
    0.1468707 = sum of:
      0.113948196 = weight(_text_:countries in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113948196 = score(doc=886,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.51358944 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.032922503 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032922503 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.

Date

22. 1.2023 18:53:32

0.023955554 = product of:
  0.14373332 = sum of:
    0.14373332 = sum of:
      0.11629789 = weight(_text_:countries in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11629789 = score(doc=313,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.52418005 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
      0.027435422 = weight(_text_:22 in 313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027435422 = score(doc=313,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 313, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=313)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This study provides the first systematic, international, large-scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co-)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co-affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core-periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as "excellence initiatives" in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.

0.022017945 = product of:
  0.13210766 = sum of:
    0.13210766 = weight(_text_:speaking in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13210766 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2840921 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.46501702 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This paper addresses the importance of improving the effectiveness of voice search systems through partial query modification. A user-centered experiment was designed to compare the effectiveness of an experimental system using partial query modification feature to a baseline system in which users could issue complete queries only, with 32 participants each searching on eight different tasks. The results indicate that the participants spent significantly more time preparing the modification but significantly less time speaking the modification by using the experimental system than by using the baseline system. The participants found that the experimental system (a) was more effective, (b) gave them more control, (c) was easier for the search tasks, and (d) saved them time than the baseline system. The results contribute to improving future voice search system design and benefiting the research community in general. System implications and future work were discussed.

0.021583412 = product of:
  0.12950046 = sum of:
    0.12950046 = weight(_text_:english in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12950046 = score(doc=97,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.594381 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

A common intermediate language representation in neural machine translation can be used to extend bilingual systems by incremental training. We propose a new architecture based on introducing an interlingual loss as an additional training objective. By adding and forcing this interlingual loss, we can train multiple encoders and decoders for each language, sharing among them a common intermediate representation. Translation results on the low-resource tasks (Turkish-English and Kazakh-English tasks) show a BLEU improvement of up to 2.8 points. However, results on a larger dataset (Russian-English and Kazakh-English) show BLEU losses of a similar amount. While our system provides improvements only for the low-resource tasks in terms of translation quality, our system is capable of quickly deploying new language pairs without the need to retrain the rest of the system, which may be a game changer in some situations. Specifically, what is most relevant regarding our architecture is that it is capable of: reducing the number of production systems, with respect to the number of languages, from quadratic to linear; incrementally adding a new language to the system without retraining the languages already there; and allowing for translations from the new language to all the others present in the system.

0.018348288 = product of:
  0.11008973 = sum of:
    0.11008973 = weight(_text_:speaking in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11008973 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2840921 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.3875142 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.014756 = idf(docFreq=107, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Alongside cognitive and social phenomena, many scholars have examined emotional and affective considerations in information science, but a potential emotional or affective paradigm has not coalesced to the extent of the social or cognitive paradigms. We argue information science research should integrate the social paradigm, as offered by social informatics, with affective and emotional considerations: a socio-emotional paradigm. A review of existing literature and findings from users' motivations to participate on the Academia section of the Stack Exchange social questioning-and-answering site make our case. We uncovered tensions between the intended information-centric focus of the community and users who believed social, emotional, and affective considerations needed to be foregrounded, speaking to online communities acting as boundary objects, with the "fit" for one user or community not always the same as for another. An integrated socio-emotional paradigm shows much strength for social informatics and information science research, including uncovering hidden concerns and differences in values, as in our study. Affective and emotional research, often bubbling under in information science, should rise to the surface is not so much a paradigm shift but an integration of social, emotional, and affective considerations into a socio-emotional paradigm.

0.018314132 = product of:
  0.10988479 = sum of:
    0.10988479 = weight(_text_:english in 5803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10988479 = score(doc=5803,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.504349 = fieldWeight in 5803, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5803)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In 2018, the national, bilingual authority file maintained by Library and Archives Canada (LAC), called Canadiana Authorities, underwent major changes when the internally-developed Integrated Library System (ILS) AMICUS was decommissioned and OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) was adopted as a replacement. As a part of the transition, LAC split its single, bilingual authority file Canadiana Authorities into separate English and French language files and joined Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) in order to manage its English-language authority records. This has been a significant change that has challenged the organization to rethink everyday practices while maintaining its commitments to the Canadian and global library community. This paper discusses this national library's history of bilingual cataloging, the reason for the changes, and the attempt to ensure that the two files "talk" to each other.

0.015763339 = product of:
  0.09458003 = sum of:
    0.09458003 = sum of:
      0.06714461 = weight(_text_:countries in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06714461 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.027435422 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027435422 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.

Date

22. 6.2023 14:09:06

0.015763339 = product of:
  0.09458003 = sum of:
    0.09458003 = sum of:
      0.06714461 = weight(_text_:countries in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06714461 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22186631 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.027435422 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027435422 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14182134 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04049921 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis provided an opportunity for information professionals to rethink the role of information in individuals' decision making such as vaccine uptake. Unlike previous studies, which often considered information as a single factor among others, this study examined the impact of the quantity and trustworthiness of information on people's adoption of information for vaccination decisions based on the information adoption model. We analyzed COVID-19 Preventive Behavior Survey data collected by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from Facebook users (N = 82,213) in 15 countries between October 2020 and March 2021. The results of logistic regression analyses indicate that reasonable quantity and trustworthiness of information were positively related to COVID-19 vaccination intent. But excessive and less than the desired amount of information was more likely to have negative impacts on vaccination intent. The degrees of trust in the mediums and in the sources were associated with the level of vaccine acceptance. But the effects of trustworthiness accorded to information sources showed variations across sources and mediums. Implications for information professionals and suggestions for policies are discussed.

Date

22. 6.2023 18:20:47

0.015108388 = product of:
  0.09065033 = sum of:
    0.09065033 = weight(_text_:english in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09065033 = score(doc=177,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.41606668 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed at understanding the use of paintings outside of an art-related context, in the English version of Wikipedia. Design/methodology/approach For this investigation, the authors identified 8,104 paintings used in 10,008 articles of the English Wikipedia edition. The authors manually coded the topic of the article in question, documented the number of monthly average views and identified the originating museum. They analysed the use of images based on frequency of use, frequency of view, associated topics and location. Early in the analysis three distinct perspectives emerged: the readers of the online encyclopaedia, the editors of the articles and the museum organisations providing the painting images (directly or indirectly). Findings Wikipedia is a widely used online information resource where images of paintings serve as visual reference to illustrate articles, notably also beyond an art-related topic and where no alternative image is available - as in the case of historic portraits. Editors used paintings as illustration of the work itself or art-related movement, but also as illustration of past events, as alternative to photographs, as well as to represent a concept or technique. Images have been used to illustrate up to 76 articles, evidencing the polysemic nature of paintings. The authors conclude that images of paintings are highly valuable information sources, also beyond an art-related context. They also find that Wikipedia is an important dissemination channel for museum collections. While art-related articles contain greater number of paintings, these receive less views than non-art-related articles containing fewer paintings. Readers of all topics, predominantly history, science and geographic articles, viewed art pieces outside of an art context. Painting images in Wikipedia receive a much larger online audience than the physical painting does when compared to the number of museum onsite visitors. The authors' results confirm the presence of a strong long-tail pattern in the frequency of image use (only 3% of painting images are used in a Wikipedia article), image view and museums represented, characteristic of network dynamics of the Internet.
Research limitations/implications While this is the first analysis of the complete collection of paintings in the English Wikipedia, the authors' results are conservative as many paintings are not identified as such in Wikidata, used for automatic harvesting. Tools to analyse image view specifically are not yet available and user privacy is highly protected, limiting the disaggregation of user data. This study serves to document a lack of diversity in image availability for global online consumption, favouring well-known Western objects. At the same time, the study evidences the need to diversify the use of images to reflect a more global perspective, particularly where paintings are used to represent concepts of techniques. Practical implications Museums wanting to increase visibility can target the reuse of their collections in non-art-related articles, which received 88% of all views in the authors' sample. Given the few museums collaborating with the Wikimedia Foundation and the apparent inefficiency resulting from leaving the use of paintings as illustration to the crowd, as only 3% of painting images are used, suggests further collaborative efforts to reposition museum content may be beneficial. Social implications This paper highlights the reach of Wikipedia as information source, where museum content can be positioned to reach a greater user group beyond the usual museum visitor, in turn increasing visual and digital literacy. Originality/value This is the first study that documents the frequency of use and views, the topical use and the originating institution of "all the paintings" in the English Wikipedia edition.

0.015108388 = product of:
  0.09065033 = sum of:
    0.09065033 = weight(_text_:english in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09065033 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21787451 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04049921 = queryNorm
        0.41606668 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3797226 = idf(docFreq=553, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We investigate different systems for extracting mathematical entities from English texts in the mathematical field of category theory as a first step for constructing a mathematical knowledge graph. We consider four different term extractors and compare their results. This small experiment showcases some of the issues with the construction and evaluation of terms extracted from noisy domain text. We also make available two open corpora in research mathematics, in particular in category theory: a small corpus of 755 abstracts from the journal TAC (3188 sentences), and a larger corpus from the nLab community wiki (15,000 sentences).