Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.04
    0.03980363 = product of:
      0.07960726 = sum of:
        0.07960726 = sum of:
          0.037263542 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037263542 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042343717 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  2. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.03
    0.033169694 = product of:
      0.06633939 = sum of:
        0.06633939 = sum of:
          0.031052953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031052953 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.035286434 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035286434 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052088603 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  3. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.028229147 = product of:
      0.056458294 = sum of:
        0.056458294 = product of:
          0.11291659 = sum of:
            0.11291659 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11291659 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  4. Swift, I.I.: Classifying readers' questions (1934) 0.02
    0.024842361 = product of:
      0.049684722 = sum of:
        0.049684722 = product of:
          0.099369444 = sum of:
            0.099369444 = weight(_text_:libraries in 594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099369444 = score(doc=594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wilson bulletin for libraries. 8(1934) no.5, S.274-275
  5. Colaric, S.M.: Instruction for Web searching : An empirical study (2003) 0.02
    0.024842361 = product of:
      0.049684722 = sum of:
        0.049684722 = product of:
          0.099369444 = sum of:
            0.099369444 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099369444 = score(doc=6333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5807211 = fieldWeight in 6333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    College and research libraries. 64(2003) no.2, S.111-122
  6. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.024700502 = product of:
      0.049401004 = sum of:
        0.049401004 = product of:
          0.09880201 = sum of:
            0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09880201 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  7. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024700502 = product of:
      0.049401004 = sum of:
        0.049401004 = product of:
          0.09880201 = sum of:
            0.09880201 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09880201 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  8. Shuman, B.A.: Cases in online search strategy (1993) 0.02
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = product of:
          0.074527085 = sum of:
            0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074527085 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Englewood, CO : Libraries Unlimited
  9. Baruchson-Arbib, S.; Bronstein, J.: Humanists as information users in the digital age : the case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel (2007) 0.02
    0.018631771 = product of:
      0.037263542 = sum of:
        0.037263542 = product of:
          0.074527085 = sum of:
            0.074527085 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074527085 = score(doc=1320,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.4355408 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User studies provide libraries with invaluable insight into their users' information needs and behaviors, allowing them to develop services that correspond to these needs. This insight has become even more important for libraries since the advent of the Internet. The Internet has brought about a development of information technologies and electronic information sources that have had a great impact on both the ways users search for information and the ways libraries manage information. Although humanists represent an important group of users for academic libraries, research studies into their information-seeking behavior since the advent of the Internet have been quite scarce (Ellis & Oldman, 2005) in the past decade. This study presents updated research on a group of humanists, Jewish studies scholars living in Israel, as information users in the digital age based on two categories: (a) the use of formal and informal information channels, and (b) the use of information technologies and their impact on humanistic research.
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017643217 = product of:
      0.035286434 = sum of:
        0.035286434 = product of:
          0.07057287 = sum of:
            0.07057287 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07057287 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  11. Pharo, N.: Web information search strategies : a model for classifying Web interaction (1999) 0.02
    0.015526476 = product of:
      0.031052953 = sum of:
        0.031052953 = product of:
          0.062105905 = sum of:
            0.062105905 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062105905 = score(doc=3831,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al
  12. Caywood, C.: ¬A shift in search strategy (1994) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at bibliographic instruction in the age of electronic searching and the the need to provide instruction to insure that remote access to the library is successful. Outlines an approach to teaching library skills by Loomis and Fink in 1993, that is equally relevant to school and public libraries, in which they argue that a successful search can no longer be equated with the quantity of material retrieved but with its relevance. This is dependent upon standardisation of access points, search language and online instructions
  13. Chamis, A.Y.: Vocabulary control and search strategies in online searching (1991) 0.01
    0.0124211805 = product of:
      0.024842361 = sum of:
        0.024842361 = product of:
          0.049684722 = sum of:
            0.049684722 = weight(_text_:libraries in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049684722 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Computers in libraries 12(1992) no.2, S.46-47; Library quarterly 62(1992) no.3, S.347-349 (R. Fidel)
  14. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.01
    0.010978876 = product of:
      0.021957751 = sum of:
        0.021957751 = product of:
          0.043915503 = sum of:
            0.043915503 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043915503 = score(doc=2939,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
  15. Niu, X.; Hemminger, B.: Analyzing the interaction patterns in a faceted search interface (2015) 0.01
    0.010978876 = product of:
      0.021957751 = sum of:
        0.021957751 = product of:
          0.043915503 = sum of:
            0.043915503 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043915503 = score(doc=1824,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1711139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.25664487 = fieldWeight in 1824, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since the adoption of faceted search in a small number of academic libraries in 2006, faceted search interfaces have gained popularity in academic and public libraries. This article clarifies whether faceted search improves the interactions between searchers and library catalogs and sheds light on ways that facets are used during a library search. To study searchers' behaviors in natural situations, we collected from the servers a data set with more than 1.5 million useful search logs. Logs were parsed, statistically analyzed, and manually studied using visualization tools to gain a general understanding of how facets are used in the search process. A user experiment with 24 subjects was conducted to further understand contextual information, such as the searchers' motivations and perceptions. The results indicate that most searchers were able to understand the concept of facets naturally and easily. The faceted search was not able to shorten the search time but was able to improve the search accuracy. Facets were used more for open-ended tasks and difficult tasks that require more effort to learn, investigate, and explore. Overall, the results weaved a detailed "story" about the ways that people use facets and the ways that facets help people use library catalogs.
  16. Limberg, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use (1999) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:53:10
  17. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  18. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  19. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  20. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010585929 = product of:
      0.021171859 = sum of:
        0.021171859 = product of:
          0.042343717 = sum of:
            0.042343717 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042343717 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18240541 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052088603 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22