Search (7213 results, page 1 of 361)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.13
    0.13283804 = product of:
      0.19925706 = sum of:
        0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024771197 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
        0.17448586 = sum of:
          0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07591552 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
          0.09857034 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09857034 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  2. Adams, S.: Comparing the IPC and the US classification systems for the patent searcher (2001) 0.13
    0.13283804 = product of:
      0.19925706 = sum of:
        0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024771197 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
        0.17448586 = sum of:
          0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07591552 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
          0.09857034 = weight(_text_:22 in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09857034 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27. 3.2002 15:22:31
    Source
    World patent information. 23(2001) no.1, S.15-23
  3. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007) 0.12
    0.11972436 = product of:
      0.17958654 = sum of:
        0.030027224 = weight(_text_:information in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030027224 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.14955932 = sum of:
          0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06507045 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.08448886 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08448886 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This note is also appearing in the Journal of the American Society for Information Systems and Technology.
    Date
    26.12.2007 14:22:47
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1441-1446
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.11
    0.11432679 = product of:
      0.17149018 = sum of:
        0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017693711 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.15379646 = sum of:
          0.054225378 = weight(_text_:systems in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054225378 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.09957108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09957108 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  5. Yetim, F.: Universal Actability : Towards an integral understanding of universal usability, (intercultural) action competence, and information systems actability (2004) 0.10
    0.10288593 = product of:
      0.1543289 = sum of:
        0.026004339 = weight(_text_:information in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026004339 = score(doc=377,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
        0.12832455 = sum of:
          0.08608012 = weight(_text_:systems in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08608012 = score(doc=377,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.5390046 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
          0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224443 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The approach to information systems actability emphasizes the social action character of information systems and its social context. It aims at a pragmatically and social sensitive approach to information systems. This paper extends the scope and focus of this approach by suggesting a research framework called universal actability. The research framework advocates for an integral understanding of universal usability, human communication and action competence, and information systems actability. To pursue this research objective, this paper focuses on the following aspects: It provides a critical review of the concepts of the previous research on information systems actability and suggests some extensions and revisions towards universal actability. In addition, it discusses several maxims for (intercultural) communications and their implications for the actors and systems. Finally, it reflects on the applicability of user modeling technology for modeling diversity in order to enhance actor's and system's actability across diverse contexts.
    Date
    22. 6.2007 13:31:31
  6. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.10
    0.095388874 = product of:
      0.1430833 = sum of:
        0.028087895 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028087895 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.114995405 = sum of:
          0.07275097 = weight(_text_:systems in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07275097 = score(doc=201,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224443 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
  7. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.09
    0.087886594 = product of:
      0.13182989 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
        0.11767492 = sum of:
          0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061349012 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  8. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.09
    0.087886594 = product of:
      0.13182989 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.11767492 = sum of:
          0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061349012 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Elovici, Y.; Shapira, Y.B.; Kantor, P.B.: ¬A decision theoretic approach to combining information filters : an analytical and empirical evaluation. (2006) 0.09
    0.08710706 = product of:
      0.1306606 = sum of:
        0.02769504 = weight(_text_:information in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02769504 = score(doc=5267,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
        0.102965556 = sum of:
          0.053680386 = weight(_text_:systems in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053680386 = score(doc=5267,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 5267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=5267,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5267, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5267)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The outputs of several information filtering (IF) systems can be combined to improve filtering performance. In this article the authors propose and explore a framework based on the so-called information structure (IS) model, which is frequently used in Information Economics, for combining the output of multiple IF systems according to each user's preferences (profile). The combination seeks to maximize the expected payoff to that user. The authors show analytically that the proposed framework increases users expected payoff from the combined filtering output for any user preferences. An experiment using the TREC-6 test collection confirms the theoretical findings.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:05:39
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.306-320
  10. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.09
    0.08710188 = sum of:
      0.055024352 = product of:
        0.16507305 = sum of:
          0.16507305 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16507305 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4405723 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021232452 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021232452 = score(doc=701,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051966466 = queryNorm
          0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.010845075 = product of:
        0.02169015 = sum of:
          0.02169015 = weight(_text_:systems in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02169015 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  11. Makewita, S.M.: Investigating the generic information-seeking function of organisational decision-makers : perspectives on improving organisational information systems (2002) 0.09
    0.08595427 = product of:
      0.1289314 = sum of:
        0.0331019 = weight(_text_:information in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0331019 = score(doc=642,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
        0.0958295 = sum of:
          0.060625814 = weight(_text_:systems in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060625814 = score(doc=642,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.37961838 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.03520369 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03520369 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The past decade has seen the emergence of a new paradigm in the corporate world where organisations emphasised connectivity as a means of exposing decision-makers to wider resources of information within and outside the organisation. Many organisations followed the initiatives of enhancing infrastructures, manipulating cultural shifts and emphasising managerial commitment for creating pools and networks of knowledge. However, the concept of connectivity is not merely presenting people with the data, but more importantly, to create environments where people can seek information efficiently. This paradigm has therefore caused a shift in the function of information systems in organisations. They have to be now assessed in relation to how they underpin people's information-seeking activities within the context of their organisational environment. This research project used interpretative research methods to investigate the nature of people's information-seeking activities at two culturally contrasting organisations. Outcomes of this research project provide insights into phenomena associated with people's information-seeking function, and show how they depend on the organisational context that is defined partly by information systems. It suggests that information-seeking is not just searching for data. The inefficiencies inherent in both people and their environments can bring opaqueness into people's data, which they need to avoid or eliminate as part of seeking information. This seems to have made information-seeking a two-tier process consisting of a primary process of searching and interpreting data and auxiliary process of avoiding and eliminating opaqueness in data. Based on this view, this research suggests that organisational information systems operate naturally as implicit dual-mechanisms to underpin the above two-tier process, and that improvements to information systems should concern maintaining the balance in these dual-mechanisms.
    Date
    22. 7.2022 12:16:58
  12. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.09
    0.08569823 = product of:
      0.12854734 = sum of:
        0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021232454 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.107314885 = sum of:
          0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06507045 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224443 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  13. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.09
    0.0853441 = product of:
      0.12801614 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=1422,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
        0.09970621 = sum of:
          0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0433803 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We propose a novel approach to incorporate term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval. The ability of the logic to handle expressive representations along with the use of such classical notions are promising characteristics for IR systems. The approach proposed here has been efficiently implemented and experiments against test collections are presented.
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.285-301
  14. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.08
    0.082761504 = product of:
      0.12414225 = sum of:
        0.018387845 = weight(_text_:information in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018387845 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.105754405 = sum of:
          0.046011757 = weight(_text_:systems in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046011757 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.059742652 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059742652 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  15. Tsakonas, G.; Papatheodorou, C.: Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries (2008) 0.08
    0.08032096 = product of:
      0.12048144 = sum of:
        0.017515881 = weight(_text_:information in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017515881 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.102965556 = sum of:
          0.053680386 = weight(_text_:systems in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053680386 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Advances in the publishing world have emerged new models of digital library development. Open access publishing modes are expanding their presence and realize the digital library idea in various means. While user-centered evaluation of digital libraries has drawn considerable attention during the last years, these systems are currently viewed from the publishing, economic and scientometric perspectives. The present study explores the concepts of usefulness and usability in the evaluation of an e-print archive. The results demonstrate that several attributes of usefulness, such as the level and the relevance of information, and usability, such as easiness of use and learnability, as well as functionalities commonly met in these systems, affect user interaction and satisfaction.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 11:49:22
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1234-1250
  16. LaBarre, K.: Discovery and access systems for Websites and cultural heritage sites reconsidering the practical application of facets (2008) 0.08
    0.08032096 = product of:
      0.12048144 = sum of:
        0.017515881 = weight(_text_:information in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017515881 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
        0.102965556 = sum of:
          0.053680386 = weight(_text_:systems in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053680386 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
          0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928517 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Facets are an increasingly common feature of contemporary access and discovery systems. These intuitively adaptable structures seem well suited for application in information architecture and the practice of knowledge management (La Barre, 2006). As browsing and searching devices, facets function equally well on e-commerce sites, digital museum portals, and online library catalogs. This paper argues that clearly articulated principles for facets and facet analysis must draw examples from current practice while building upon heritage principles m order to scaffold the development of robust and fully faceted information infrastructures.
    Date
    27.12.2008 9:50:22
  17. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.08
    0.079816245 = product of:
      0.11972436 = sum of:
        0.02001815 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02001815 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.09970621 = sum of:
          0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0433803 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.08
    0.076847665 = product of:
      0.115271494 = sum of:
        0.096292615 = product of:
          0.28887784 = sum of:
            0.28887784 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28887784 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4405723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01897888 = product of:
          0.03795776 = sum of:
            0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03795776 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
    Source
    IBM systems journal. 44(2005) no.4, S.887-903
  19. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.08
    0.075907454 = product of:
      0.11386118 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
        0.09970621 = sum of:
          0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0433803 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Lingo ist ein frei verfügbares System (open source) zur automatischen Indexierung der deutschen Sprache. Bei der Entwicklung von lingo standen hohe Konfigurierbarkeit und Flexibilität des Systems für unterschiedliche Einsatzmöglichkeiten im Vordergrund. Der Beitrag zeigt den Nutzen einer linguistisch basierten automatischen Indexierung für das Information Retrieval auf. Die für eine Retrievalverbesserung zur Verfügung stehende linguistische Funktionalität von lingo wird vorgestellt und an Beispielen erläutert: Grundformerkennung, Kompositumerkennung bzw. Kompositumzerlegung, Wortrelationierung, lexikalische und algorithmische Mehrwortgruppenerkennung, OCR-Fehlerkorrektur. Der offene Systemaufbau von lingo wird beschrieben, mögliche Einsatzszenarien und Anwendungsgrenzen werden benannt.
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  20. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.08
    0.075907454 = product of:
      0.11386118 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
        0.09970621 = sum of:
          0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0433803 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

Types

  • a 6066
  • m 748
  • el 377
  • s 251
  • x 127
  • b 38
  • r 32
  • i 27
  • n 13
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications